Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

How to make a nuclear medicine technology bachelor's program more attractive

Frances Keech, Susan Belinsky, Lisa Fanning and Stephanie Rhymer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2520;
Frances Keech
1School of Medical Imaging and Therapeuics, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Belinsky
1School of Medical Imaging and Therapeuics, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Fanning
1School of Medical Imaging and Therapeuics, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Rhymer
1School of Medical Imaging and Therapeuics, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2520

Objectives To implement an entry level bachelors program in nuclear medicine technology that is competitive with 2 year associate degree program and to attract second career students who have limited time to dedicate to full time education.

Methods In 2003 the faculty and administration of the department of radiologic sciences at the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (MCPHS) was facing a dilemma; low enrollment in the Bachelors of Science programs with majors in Nuclear Medicine Technology (NMT), Radiation Therapy and Radiography. In response the college introduced created a 32 month accelerated bachelors program for each major. In the accelerated format, students would attend classes over the same number of semesters, but all year round. So instead of doing fall and spring and then taking summers off they would attend classes in the summer for the first and second years of the program and for the final year they would graduate at the end of spring semester. In the last year the authors have reviewed the outcome data of the last eight years since the new format was introduced.

Results Enrollments in the NMT program have increased from an average 7 students per year prior to 2003 to an average of 13 per year in the last 8 years. Board pass rates have improved from 90% to 95%. Student retention has decreased from 85% per year to 80%. Students who received grades below a C in Algebra and Trigonometry and Anatomy and Physiology I in the first year had a high likelihood of dropping out.

Conclusions The introduction of an accelerated format allows students to finish a bachelor degree in 32 months rather than the usual 44 months. Introducing this accelerated format has increased enrollments in the NMT program. The poor retention data has led to some changes in the curriculum.

Research Support Database of student outcome

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to make a nuclear medicine technology bachelor's program more attractive
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
How to make a nuclear medicine technology bachelor's program more attractive
Frances Keech, Susan Belinsky, Lisa Fanning, Stephanie Rhymer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2520;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How to make a nuclear medicine technology bachelor's program more attractive
Frances Keech, Susan Belinsky, Lisa Fanning, Stephanie Rhymer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2520;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • 99mTc-HSA is a valuable tracer in monitoring acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats
  • The effect of truncation artifact to the myocardium on myocardial perfusion SPECT : Phantom Analysis
  • Studies on measurement of thyroid uptake rate on 131I scintigraphy images
Show more Technologist

Technologist Scientific Papers III

  • Evaluation of global and regional myocardial uptake of MIBG-I123 with multimodality acquisition
  • Errors in attenuation correction with ECG-gated myocardial PET/CT images: Evaluation with phantom study
  • Reduction in occupational radiation exposure using a CZT camera for MPI
Show more Technologist Scientific Papers III

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire