Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

Identifying optimal SPECT acquisition for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA

Jose Gonzalez, Asa McCoy, Martha Mar and Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2507;
Jose Gonzalez
1Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asa McCoy
1Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha Mar
1Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srinivas Kappadath
1Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2507

Objectives To identify the optimal SPECT image acquisition time per view for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA.

Methods Nominal 5 mCi of 99mTc-MAA was injected via the hepatic artery of the patient to assess perfusion of liver lesions as part of 90Y-microsphere therapy planning. Gated SPECT data was acquired and rebinned to generate 5 separate SPECT acquisition times: 34 s/view 28 s/view, 24 s/view, 20 s/view, and 16 s/view, respectively. Volumes of interest (VOI) were drawn over liver lesions and right kidney (background) for signal analysis.

Results Imaging acquisitions of 16 seconds and 20 seconds per view demonstrated little variation in signal to noise ratio (<2%), and the percent variation of liver counts per ml vs. time ratio was less than 2.52% . SPECT images acquired at 24 s/view and greater showed signal overflow in 2 of the 6 (33%) patients imaged. Using the tumor counts per mL vs. time ratio we were able to determine that count variation greater than 10% resulted in overflow of counts in the targeted region.

Conclusions Statistical data acquired identifies no significant change in signal to noise ratio or liver counts per mL to time ratio in imaging azimuths of 16 seconds and 20 seconds and potential SPECT signal overflow for times 24 s/view and greater . The results suggest SPECT acquisition time of 16 s/view is optimal for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA without statistically sacrificing image quality

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying optimal SPECT acquisition for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Identifying optimal SPECT acquisition for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA
Jose Gonzalez, Asa McCoy, Martha Mar, Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2507;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Identifying optimal SPECT acquisition for liver imaging using 99mTc-MAA
Jose Gonzalez, Asa McCoy, Martha Mar, Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2507;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • The Study on the Correlation of the Ejection Fraction(EF) of Multi Gated Blood Pool Scan(MUGA) and Echocardiography according to the condition of cardiac function
  • Factors Impacting Clinical Protocol Optimisation and SUVmax uncertainty in [68Ga]-PSMA PET Imaging
  • Effect of collimator choice on 111In liquid gastric measurements
Show more Technologist

Technologist Scientific Papers I

  • Initial experience with I-123 Ioflupane: Optimization of imaging protocol on SPECT/CT
  • Selection of kVp and mA for low-dose attenuation correction in pediatric SPECT/CT
  • PET lung ventilation scanning with Gallium-68 aerosol (Gallgas) versus Technegas SPECT in patients with obstructive lung disease: A feasibility study
Show more Technologist Scientific Papers I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire