Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

SUVmax values in FDG-PET/CT scans of patients with HCC: A possible new prognostic factor

Sukhkarn Bains, Spencer Behr, Carlos Corvera, Sana Khan, Aung Win, Youngho Seo, Nhan Nguyen and Carina Mari Aparici
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1308;
Sukhkarn Bains
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer Behr
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Corvera
3Surgery, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sana Khan
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aung Win
2Nuclear Medicine, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Youngho Seo
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nhan Nguyen
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carina Mari Aparici
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1308

Objectives HCC is the most frequent liver cancer. Hepatitis B and C are risk factors. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFT) is used as a tumor marker. Prognosis is very poor, and mainly based on: tumor size and TNM staging. Management is controversial. Different management-trees and treatment options based on prognostic factors exist. Aggressive surgery or liver transplant in early disease confined to the liver is probably the only cure. Metastasis is considered bad prognoses and tends to be managed with just supportive care. It has been postulated that additional prognostic factors could improve the management of these patients. The goal of this study was to assess if SUVmax values in FDG-PET/CT scans performed in patients with HCC at diagnoses could be used as a new prognostic factor.

Methods 33 patients (30♂, 3♀), age 64.5±8.8 yo, with hepatitis B and/or C, elevated AFP (range 50,078-2.5) and newly diagnosed HCC were imaged with contrast-enhanced CT and FDG-PET/CT. SUVmax of the primary tumors was calculated in all cases. SUVmax values were correlated to bad prognoses based on incidence of metastatic disease.

Results SUVmax levels ranged from 2.1-39.9 (mean 7.0±6.77). All patients with SUVmax>6 showed metastases (8/30) at the time of diagnoses, with exception of three patients. Using a cutoff value of SUVmax=6, 72.7% of patients with SUVmax>6 showed metastases and 88% of patients without metastases had SUVmax<6. A Spearman Rank Correlation between metastases and SUVmax values showed a rho=0.6988 and a significant two-sided p-value < 0.04. AFP and tumor size were not significant.

Conclusions SUVmax levels in FDG-PET/CT scans performed in patients with HCC tumors at time of diagnoses could become a new prognostic factor, since in our group of patients higher SUVmax levels seem to significantly correlate with higher incidence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnoses. SUVmax as a new prognostic factor could eventually improve the management of these patients in the near future

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SUVmax values in FDG-PET/CT scans of patients with HCC: A possible new prognostic factor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
SUVmax values in FDG-PET/CT scans of patients with HCC: A possible new prognostic factor
Sukhkarn Bains, Spencer Behr, Carlos Corvera, Sana Khan, Aung Win, Youngho Seo, Nhan Nguyen, Carina Mari Aparici
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1308;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
SUVmax values in FDG-PET/CT scans of patients with HCC: A possible new prognostic factor
Sukhkarn Bains, Spencer Behr, Carlos Corvera, Sana Khan, Aung Win, Youngho Seo, Nhan Nguyen, Carina Mari Aparici
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1308;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • The 18F-FDG PET/CT is helpful in determining the cause and extent of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
  • Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity can be useful to select patients for radiotherapy dose-escalation in stage III non-small cell lung cancer
  • Imaging patients with breast and prostate cancers using combined 18F NaF/18F FDG and TOF simultaneous PET/ MRI
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: GI-Colorectal & Liver Posters

  • Gene expression profiling of colon cancer by correlation with 18F-FDG kinetics as measured by dynamic positron emission tomography-computed tomography (dPET-CT)
  • Role of FDG PET-CT in prognostication of Hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing Transarterial Radioembolisation
  • Fusion PET/MRI Assessment of 18F-FDG PET-positive Lesions Comparing With PET/CT in Abdomen
Show more MTA I: GI-Colorectal & Liver Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire