Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEducational Exhibits

Simplified quantitative imaging techniques for analysis of dynamic PET/CT scans in response assessment: A promising approach for routine clinical use

Gonca Bural, Charles Laymon, Matthew Oborski, Julie Price and James Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1074;
Gonca Bural
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Laymon
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Oborski
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Price
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Mountz
1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1074

Learning Objectives 1. To understand the limitations of current approaches in cancer therapy response assessment. 2. To be able to describe research PET scan procedures; their advantages; and the barriers to clinical implementation. 3. To understand the meaning of some of the commonly used parameters from an analysis of dynamic PET data. 4. To be able to describe simplifications to research procedures that can lead to clinically feasible extended PET protocols and to understand the effect of such simplifications on deduced physiologic parameters.

PET is a powerful clinical imaging modality in the initial staging of various malignancies and in the assessment of treatment response. In usual clinical practice, single time point imaging is performed without blood sampling yielding a global estimate of tracer uptake, usually expressed as SUV. Much additional data (e.g. dynamic acquisition and arterial blood sampling) can be obtained and analyzed to yield imaging rate-constant parameters reflective of the more complete physiological status of the tissue. Because of their complexity, burden on clinical resources, and tolerability by patients, such acquisitions and analyses are typically reserved for research applications. However, there is increasing interest in adding these quantitative biomarkers to the utility of clinical PET by adapting simplified (i.e. clinically feasible) versions of research procedures to yield an improved understanding of tumor response to therapy. Examples of simplifications include the use of image-based input curves (rather than from arterial blood sampling) and the use of abbreviated shortened dynamic acquisitions (Table shows proposed clinical scheduling of dynamic and standard PET-CT scans) allowing for routine clinical throughput.

Research Support Supported by NIH grant 1U01CA140230 to Dr. Mountz

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Proposed Shortened Clinically Feasible Acquisition times for dynamic PET-CT scans

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simplified quantitative imaging techniques for analysis of dynamic PET/CT scans in response assessment: A promising approach for routine clinical use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Simplified quantitative imaging techniques for analysis of dynamic PET/CT scans in response assessment: A promising approach for routine clinical use
Gonca Bural, Charles Laymon, Matthew Oborski, Julie Price, James Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1074;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Simplified quantitative imaging techniques for analysis of dynamic PET/CT scans in response assessment: A promising approach for routine clinical use
Gonca Bural, Charles Laymon, Matthew Oborski, Julie Price, James Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 1074;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Educational Exhibits

  • Do They Work? Utilizing the "Hoshin Kanri" Process in the Nuclear Medicine Department
  • Challenges in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Benign Osseous Hypermetabolic Lesions
  • Early small bowel activity may predict rapid gastric transit on gastric emptying scintigraphy
Show more Educational Exhibits

MTA I: Educational Exhibits-Oncology

  • Pictorial essay: Ophthalmologic abnormalities in FDG PET/CT
  • A rare case of multiple inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT) of the liver and spleen: The findings on F-18 FDG-PET/CT
  • FDG-F18 pitfalls in 2400 PET-CT scans
Show more MTA I: Educational Exhibits-Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire