Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist Student Abstracts

Regadenoson versus adenosine: A patient’s perspective

Katie Frank, LeAnn Manson and Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2433;
Katie Frank
1Nuclear Medicine, Ministry St. Joseph's Hospital, Marshfield, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LeAnn Manson
1Nuclear Medicine, Ministry St. Joseph's Hospital, Marshfield, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlyn Johnson
1Nuclear Medicine, Ministry St. Joseph's Hospital, Marshfield, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2433

Objectives Regadenoson (Lexiscan) is an A2A adenosine receptor agonist indicated for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in myocardial perfusion imaging. Regadenoson was first approved in April of 2008; however, Ministry St. Joseph’s Hospital did not begin performing regadenoson stress tests until April of 2010. The following study was conducted to compare a patient’s perspective of regadenoson versus adenosine as well as the symptoms of each test.

Methods Data was collected from questionnaires on over sixty-five patients who had previously undergone an adenosine sestamibi and were undergoing a regadenoson sestamibi. Patients were asked if they remembered the previous adenosine stress test and about any symptoms they experienced. They were then asked about any effects of the regadenoson and to compare the regadenoson to the adenosine overall.

Results Out of the 50 patients who remembered their previous adenosine stress test, 74% of them favored the regadenoson. Symptoms were experienced with both types of pharmaceuticals. The most common side effect with regadenoson patients was headaches whereas chest pain was more common in patients given adenosine.

Conclusions Patients favored regadenoson over adenosine and had fewer symptoms comparatively

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regadenoson versus adenosine: A patient’s perspective
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Regadenoson versus adenosine: A patient’s perspective
Katie Frank, LeAnn Manson, Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2433;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regadenoson versus adenosine: A patient’s perspective
Katie Frank, LeAnn Manson, Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 2433;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist Student Abstracts

  • Comparison of radiation exposures between two different lung scan approaches
  • A phantom study to simulate half-dose imaging in myocardial perfusion SPECT
  • A study of a half-gated technique for the evaluation of 3D iterative reconstruction in reduced count cardiac SPECT
Show more Technologist Student Abstracts

Technologist Student Scientific Papers III

  • Wipe counting efficiency of Radium 223 Chloride using a specific counting methodology.
  • Implementing a modified Russell two-point method to measure glomerular filtration rates (GFR).
  • Gamma camera/SPECT QC: Can 57Co be used to perform center of rotation?
Show more Technologist Student Scientific Papers III

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire