Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/GU

Restaging of penile cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Yamin Dou, Edward Pinkus, Charles Allison, Brady McKee, Leonard Zinman and Jill Buckley
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1899;
Yamin Dou
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Pinkus
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Allison
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brady McKee
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard Zinman
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill Buckley
1Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1899

Objectives This study is to evaluate whether FDG PET/CT is useful in the follow-up of penile cancer patients after initial treatment.

Methods 17 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis who underwent FDG PET/CT between 01/2007 and 11/2010 were identified in our database. Of these, 12 patients had restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT after initial treatment and had accessible follow-up information were included in the study. All scans were done on a 64-slice GE PET/CT (DVCT) after injection of approximately 15 mCi of 18F-FDG. Whole body noncontrast CT was performed as part of the PET/CT procedure. Any radiotracer uptake with a corresponding lymph node on PET/CT scan was interpreted as positive for metastasis.

Results Of the 6/12 patients with positive FDG uptake in inguinal nodes, 5 patients had surgically proven metastatic disease. Total of 7 metastatic lymph nodes were resected, of which 6 were positive on FDG PET/CT (mean size 2.5± 1.3cm with an average SUVmax of 6.5 ± 3.2). One patient with 3 PET/CT positive lymph nodes (average size 1.9±0.1cm, SUVmax 2.0± 0.3) was disease free based on repeated imaging studies and clinically follow-up of 23 months. All 6/12 patients with negative FDG PET/CT for locoregional metastasis had no active disease at average clinical follow-up of 19.4 months (SD±10). The sensitivity of detecting inguinal nodal metastasis on a per-patient basis was 100%, and the specificity was 85.7%. On a nodal basis, the sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastasis was 85.7 % (6/7). Two patients had positive uptake in the penile remnant, of which one was confirmed as false positive for penile recurrence.

Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT is very accurate in detecting locoregional metastasis on follow-up penile cancer patients

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Restaging of penile cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Restaging of penile cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Yamin Dou, Edward Pinkus, Charles Allison, Brady McKee, Leonard Zinman, Jill Buckley
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1899;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Restaging of penile cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Yamin Dou, Edward Pinkus, Charles Allison, Brady McKee, Leonard Zinman, Jill Buckley
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1899;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/GU

  • Preliminary evaluation of 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of metastatic disease in men with PSA relapse after treatment for localized primary prostate cancer
  • FCH PET/CT in the assessment of recurrent prostate cancer: Correlation with PSA level
  • 18FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of lymph node involvement in patients with invasive penile carcinoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/GU

Prostate-GU Posters

  • GE-148 (18F) injection PET/CT imaging and multiparametric MRI for detection of localized prostate cancer using customized MRI-based specimen molds
  • Role of C-11-Choline-PET/CT in evaluation of patients affected by prostate cancer with suspected relapse due to PSA elevation
  • [11C]Choline PET/CT for therapy response assessment of neoadjuvant combined chemohormonal treatment in patients with high risk prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy
Show more Prostate-GU Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire