Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Gynecological

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT for detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison with conventional imaging

Harmandeep Singh, Punit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Sunil Jeph, Parveen Kundu, Aftab Nazar, Abhishek Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Guru Bandopadhyaya and Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1856;
Harmandeep Singh
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Punit Sharma
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Kumar
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunil Jeph
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Parveen Kundu
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aftab Nazar
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abhishek Kumar
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chandrasekhar Bal
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guru Bandopadhyaya
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arun Malhotra
1Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1856

Objectives The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of F18-FDG PET-CT with conventional imaging (CI) for the detection of recurrence in previously treated patients of endometrial carcinoma.

Methods A total of 20 endometrial carcinoma patients previously treated by surgery (20)/ radiotherapy (7)/or chemotherapy (4) and having suspected recurrence were analysed retrospectively. The mean age was 56.4±10 years (range: 38-77). Four patients were premenopausal and 16 were postmenopausal. All patients underwent F18-FDG PET-CT for recurrence suspected clinically and/or on CI. F18-FDG PET-CT studies were evaluated by two nuclear medicine physicians. Results of F18-FDG PET-CT were compared with CI (ultrasound/ CT/ MRI). Final diagnosis of recurrence was made by biopsy and/or clinical/imaging follow up.

Results Of 20 patients, 15 were found to have recurrence based on biopsy and/or clinical/imaging follow up. F18-FDG PET-CT was positive in 86.6% (13/15) of these patients; while CI was positive in 80% (12/15). Five patients did not have recurrence. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of F18-FDG PET-CT for detecting recurrence were 81.3%, 75%, 92.6%, 50% and that of CI were 80%, 60%, 85.7% and 50%, respectively. Both F18-FDG PET-CT and CI detected local recurrence in 8 patients (p 1.00). Most common site of distant metastasis on F18-FDG PET-CT was lymph node (8/15) followed by lung (5/15), liver (2/15), bone (2/15) and least common was adrenal gland (1/15). CI detected only 12/18 (66.6 %) of metastatic lesions detected on F18-FDG PET-CT. F18-FDG PET-CT detected significantly more lymph nodal, liver and lung metastasis compared to CI (p 0.044).

Conclusions F18-FDG PET-CT plays an important role in detecting recurrent disease in patients with endometrial cancer. PET-CT performs better than CI especially for detection of recurrence in node, lung and liver metastasis

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT for detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison with conventional imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT for detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison with conventional imaging
Harmandeep Singh, Punit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Sunil Jeph, Parveen Kundu, Aftab Nazar, Abhishek Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Guru Bandopadhyaya, Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1856;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT for detection of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison with conventional imaging
Harmandeep Singh, Punit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Sunil Jeph, Parveen Kundu, Aftab Nazar, Abhishek Kumar, Chandrasekhar Bal, Guru Bandopadhyaya, Arun Malhotra
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1856;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Gynecological

  • The clinical value of SPECT/CT for sentinel node mapping in patients with uterine cervical cancer
  • FDG PET/CT in monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in cervical cancer patients
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis: Gynecological

Gynecological Posters

  • FDG PET in monitoring relapse and guiding secondary cytoreductive surgery of ovarian cancer
  • FDG PET/CT in monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in cervical cancer patients
Show more Gynecological Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire