Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

68Ga PET/CT Ventilation–Perfusion Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: A Pilot Study with Comparison to Conventional Scintigraphy

Michael S. Hofman, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Thomas W. Barber, Oliver C. Neels, Peter Eu and Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2011, 52 (10) 1513-1519; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.093344
Michael S. Hofman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Mathieu Beauregard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas W. Barber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver C. Neels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Eu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney J. Hicks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Box plot comparing qualitative image scores. Score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 representing none or normal.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Representative coronal slice of patient 9, with severe chronic obstructive airway disease. (A) SPECT ventilation image was deemed nondiagnostic because of marked clumping and poor peripheral distribution of radiotracer. (B) PET image also demonstrates clumping, but peripheral distribution is more homogeneous, with corresponding matched changes on perfusion imaging enabling exclusion of PE with higher confidence. (C and D) Fused PET/CT (C) and low-dose CT (D) demonstrate no evidence of consolidation.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Coronal (left) and sagittal (right) SPECT (A), PET (B), and PET/CT (C) perfusion images of patient 5, demonstrating multiple segmental unmatched perfusion defects with near-normal ventilation (not shown). Diagnosis of PE was confirmed on follow-up. PET perfusion study was performed 8 d after SPECT study, accounting for resolution of some perfusion abnormalities.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Coronal and sagittal SPECT perfusion (A), PET perfusion (B), and axial PET/CT (C) images in patient with non–small cell lung carcinoma. Right upper lobe shows large unmatched perfusion defect (normal ventilation not shown). On its own, this may be interpreted as consistent with PE, but correlative CT demonstrates extensive mediastinal lymphadenopathy with extrinsic compression of right upper lobe pulmonary artery, a more likely explanation for findings than PE. Contrast-enhanced CT confirmed findings.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Summary of Patient Characteristics

    Patient no.Age (y)Symptoms of DVTPE most or equally likely diagnosisHR > 100Immobilization (≥3 d) or surgery in previous 4 wkPrior PE or DVTHemoptysisMalignancyPrior radiotherapy to chest
    161NNYNNNYY
    224NYYNNNYY
    355NNYNNNYN
    441NNNNNNYN
    562YYYYYNNN
    668NNYYNNYN
    757NNNNNNYN
    826NNYNNNYY
    970NYNNNNYY
    1054YYYYNNYN
    • DVT = deep venous thrombosis; HR = heart rate.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Conventional V/Q and PET/CT V/Q Results

    Patient no.Days between PET and SPECTConventional V/Q resultPET/CT resultCTPA resultFinal diagnosis on follow-upLength of follow-up (d)
    TechniquePEAncillary findings
    10SPECT/CTAbsentAirway diseaseConcordant—No PE151
    20SPECT/CTAbsentAtelectasis, mediastinal LN, pericardial effusionConcordantEquivocalNo PE178
    30SPECT/CTAbsentExtrinsic RUL artery compression, postradiotherapy changeConcordant—No PE140
    42SPECT/CTAbsentConcordantNo PE44
    58SPECTBilateralConcordantBilateral PEPE172
    60SPECT/CTAbsentConcordant—No PE147
    76SPECT/CTAbsentConcordant—No PE137
    80SPECT/CTAbsentPostradiotherapy changesConcordant—No PE107
    91SPECT/CTNondiagnosticAirway diseasePE absent—No PE102
    101SPECT/CTBilateralPostradiotherapy change, bronchiectasisPE absent—PE81
    • RUL = right upper lobe.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 52 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue 10
October 1, 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga PET/CT Ventilation–Perfusion Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: A Pilot Study with Comparison to Conventional Scintigraphy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga PET/CT Ventilation–Perfusion Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: A Pilot Study with Comparison to Conventional Scintigraphy
Michael S. Hofman, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Thomas W. Barber, Oliver C. Neels, Peter Eu, Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2011, 52 (10) 1513-1519; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093344

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga PET/CT Ventilation–Perfusion Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: A Pilot Study with Comparison to Conventional Scintigraphy
Michael S. Hofman, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Thomas W. Barber, Oliver C. Neels, Peter Eu, Rodney J. Hicks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2011, 52 (10) 1513-1519; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093344
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Technical Overview of Technegas as a Lung Ventilation Agent
  • Single-arm prospective interventional study assessing feasibility of using gallium-68 ventilation and perfusion PET/CT to avoid functional lung in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer
  • Correlation of 68Ga Ventilation-Perfusion PET/CT with Pulmonary Function Test Indices for Assessing Lung Function
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire