Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

Radiation exposure from FDG PET patients with multiple same day appointments

Sharon White, Janine Beeson, Janis O'Malley and Michael Yester
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 592;
Sharon White
1Dept of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janine Beeson
1Dept of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janis O'Malley
1Dept of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Yester
1Dept of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

592

Objectives Investigate radiation exposure to staff and public from patients leaving the PET facility for other clinic areas.

Methods 20 patients with same day appointments after PET were surveyed to determine time spent in various areas as well as for the number and age of accompanying people. 28.7% of patients at our institution have same day appointments with their physiicans and 34% have multiple appointments. Exposure rates were calculated at various distances and time from injection using the accepted dose rate constant to determine potential exposure to others. Survey meter measurements on some patients was used to determine exposure variation as a function of distance.

Results 555 MBq FDG at 0.5m for 1 hr begining 95 min postinjection resulted in 0.08 mGy calculated air kerma. Measured results were less,see Table. Patients were frequently in close contact with others for prolonged periods. Waiting rooms with chairs <1m apart resulted in the greatest exposure (average waiting room time 70.4 min). One patient brought three children with them while others drove long distances. Exposure was low for physicians spending 15 min at 1 m with a patient. However, several of our physicians routinely see 5-9 same day patients per week so the cumulative amount (~12 mrem/month) may make behavioral changes desirable.

Conclusions Interpreting exposure measurements at ≤1m is challenging since patients do not behave as point sources. At 0.5 m measurements were ~70-80% of expected. While total exposure is well below regulations, simple modifications result in a desirable decrease in exposure. Clinicians could delay appointments and patients could maintain distance from others. Children should not be brought to appointments

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Measured Patient vs. Expected Exposure Rate 1 hr After 555 MBq Injection

Typical survey meter results reported in mR/hr taken laterally at mid-chest region.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation exposure from FDG PET patients with multiple same day appointments
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radiation exposure from FDG PET patients with multiple same day appointments
Sharon White, Janine Beeson, Janis O'Malley, Michael Yester
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 592;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiation exposure from FDG PET patients with multiple same day appointments
Sharon White, Janine Beeson, Janis O'Malley, Michael Yester
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 592;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

  • Cost analysis of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in cancer patients: “Single step” examination vs stand-alone modalities
  • 18FDG PET/CT vs. 123I-MIBG imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: Diagnostic comparison and survival analysis
  • Are national procedure guidelines incorporated into local myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) protocols?
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

Operations/Practice-Based/Outcomes Research

  • Initial evaluation of the applicability of PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST 1.0)
  • What to do and when? Comparison of clinical, PET and PET-CT surveillance in detection of relapsed Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (ANHL)
Show more Operations/Practice-Based/Outcomes Research

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire