Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist: Cardiovascular Basic and Clinical

False positive pericardial effusion due to breast attenuation in multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan

Martha Mar and E. Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2030;
Martha Mar
1Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Kim
2Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2030

Objectives MUGA scans are used to evaluate the left ventricle function and pericardial anatomy. A photopenic “U-halo” around the cardiac blood pool in the left anterior oblique (LAO) view is commonly seen with pericardial effusion. We describe findings of false positive pericardial effusion due to breast attenuation in cancer patients.

Methods Several cases that demonstrated the photopenic “U-halo” in the LAO view did not have true pericardial effusion. The patients' breast size and how far the breast sagged in reference to the heart silhouette were visually observed in topograms. The oblique tilt position was evaluated to determine the effect it may have in creating the photopenic “U-halo”. A unique MUGA case demonstrating collateral vessels in bilateral breasts was used as a reference marker image to determine the effect of a slightly more anterior versus left lateral oblique tilt in the LAO view.

Results Large breasts can overlie the heart in the LAO projection. The overlying breast can cause the appearance of pericardial effusion in the resulting image by attenuating tissues surrounding the heart. The positioning of the breast also affected the appearance of the photopenic halo. A patient with tissue expanders having more upright breasts demonstrated a photopenic area anterior to the left ventricle whereas a large breast that sagged more laterally demonstrated no photopenic area.

Conclusions Patients with large breasts may show a photopenic “U-halo” in the LAO view dependent on how far the breast sags in reference to the heart silhouette and on the positioning of the oblique tilt. The anterior image should be used to determine breast attenuation versus a photopenic area surrounding the heart. If both the anterior and LAO view demonstrates the “U-halo”, taking another view with a slightly more anterior or lateral oblique position will demonstrate inconsistency of the photopenic area thereby excluding diagnosis of pericardial effusion

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
False positive pericardial effusion due to breast attenuation in multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
False positive pericardial effusion due to breast attenuation in multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan
Martha Mar, E. Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2030;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
False positive pericardial effusion due to breast attenuation in multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan
Martha Mar, E. Kim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2030;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist: Cardiovascular Basic and Clinical

  • Impact of D-SPECT imaging system on Mayo Clinic nuclear cardiology efficiency project
  • Automated analysis of the mismatched region on dual SPECT using 123I-BMIPP and 201Tl
  • Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated 4 hr-rest Tl-201 in stress-rest thallium-201 SPECT with MUGA
Show more Technologist: Cardiovascular Basic and Clinical

Technologist Papers V: Cardiology & Radiopharmaceuticals

  • Impact of D-SPECT imaging system on Mayo Clinic nuclear cardiology efficiency project
  • Automated analysis of the mismatched region on dual SPECT using 123I-BMIPP and 201Tl
  • Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated 4 hr-rest Tl-201 in stress-rest thallium-201 SPECT with MUGA
Show more Technologist Papers V: Cardiology & Radiopharmaceuticals

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire