Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Head motion of anesthetized patients during high-resolution PET brain imaging

S. Conant, S. Thada and W. Barker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1366;
S. Conant
1PET Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Thada
1PET Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Barker
1PET Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1366

Objectives Patient motion during brain scans can compromise the high spatial resolution capabilities of PET scanners like the Siemens ECAT HRRT. One may assume that there is no observable head motion for patients under anesthesia, or that head restraints are the best solution to prevent motion. However, for high-resolution imaging, even small movements can degrade the imaging of small brain structures. Head restraints may also hinder maintenance or emergency access to patients during scanning, access that may introduce head movements. Here we retrospectively investigated the measured head motion of anesthetized patients without head restraints during HRRT brain scans.

Methods The HRRT is optimized for human brain imaging and has a spatial resolution of 2.4 mm. A Polaris infrared retro-reflector system (Northern Digital, Inc.) provides real-time position and orientation of the patient’s head to within 0.35 mm. The reference position is defined as the average location of the patient during transmission scanning and tracking is continued through the emission scan. The position information is transformed into scanner coordinates and motion is corrected event-by-event during list-mode reconstruction. In this study we evaluated the motion of eight patients having 90-minute emission scans for trends and displacement magnitude.

Results All patients demonstrated gradual drifts in position over the duration of the 90-minute scan period. On average, translations of 4.8 millimeters were observed due to this gradual motion. A maximum translation of six millimeters was observed for drift motion. Rotations of 1-2 degrees were common. Additional rapid translations of several millimeters were typical when anesthesiologist intervention occurred. The greatest observed sudden translation was 12 millimeters.

Conclusions Motion correction may be desired for high resolution PET scans of anesthetized patients. This is particularly true for scans of one hour or more, or where anesthesiologist intervention is likely.

Research Support This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, CC

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Head motion of anesthetized patients during high-resolution PET brain imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Head motion of anesthetized patients during high-resolution PET brain imaging
S. Conant, S. Thada, W. Barker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1366;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Head motion of anesthetized patients during high-resolution PET brain imaging
S. Conant, S. Thada, W. Barker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1366;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • A new technique for the evaluation of both glucose metabolism and atrophy using brain FDG-PET alone
  • Experimental comparison of SUV measurement between two generations of PET scanners
  • Monte-Carlo based system matrix generation for the Biograph mMR
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • A new technique for the evaluation of both glucose metabolism and atrophy using brain FDG-PET alone
  • Experimental comparison of SUV measurement between two generations of PET scanners
  • Monte-Carlo based system matrix generation for the Biograph mMR
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire