Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/Genitourinary

Comparison of bone scintigraphy with Tc-99m-DPD and PET/CT with C-11-choline for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer

Philip Aschoff, Andre Rieger, Matthias Werner, David Schilling, Susanne Eschmann and Christina Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1275;
Philip Aschoff
1Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Rieger
2Nuclear Medicine, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Werner
1Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Schilling
3Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Eschmann
2Nuclear Medicine, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Pfannenberg
1Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1275

Objectives PET/CT with C-11-choline (choline-PET/CT) is a promising tool for imaging prostate carcinomas and its metastases. We compared the value of Choline-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases with the standard imaging modality Tc-99m-bone-scintigraphy (scintigraphy).

Methods Retrospective analysis of scintigraphy and choline-PET/CT in 31 patients with histological proven prostate cancer and clinical suspicion of metastases, who were examined by both methods (mean time lapse of 13 days between the examinations). The examinations were evaluated lesion wise and region wise by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. A consensus of all further examinations and a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months served as gold standard.

Results The mean PSA at the time of the examinations was 3,62 ng/ml (range: 0,97 to 26 ng/ml). In total 82 bone lesions were identified. In 11 of 31 patients (35%) neither cholin-PET/CT nor scintigraphy detected bone metastases. 20 of 31 patients (65%) had bone metastases and in 6 of these 20 patients the results of cholin-PET/CT and scintigraphy were identical. The accuracy for the detection of bone metastases was 92% for scintigraphy and 81% for choline-PET/CT. Scintigraphy showed a higher sensitivity whereas choline-PET/CT showed a superior specificity (82% vs. 36%). The lowest sensitivity of choline-PET/CT was found for metastases in ribs. In the examined patients there was no correlation between the choline-uptake of bone metastases and clinical parameters (grading, PSA).

Conclusions PET/CT with C-11-Choline is a method with a high specificity for the detection of bone metastases in whole body staging of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Nevertheless, due to its limited sensitivity it can not replace the widely available bone scintigraphy in many cases

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of bone scintigraphy with Tc-99m-DPD and PET/CT with C-11-choline for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of bone scintigraphy with Tc-99m-DPD and PET/CT with C-11-choline for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
Philip Aschoff, Andre Rieger, Matthias Werner, David Schilling, Susanne Eschmann, Christina Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1275;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of bone scintigraphy with Tc-99m-DPD and PET/CT with C-11-choline for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer
Philip Aschoff, Andre Rieger, Matthias Werner, David Schilling, Susanne Eschmann, Christina Pfannenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1275;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/Genitourinary

  • The characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Relation to TNM staging, grading and other renal malignant neoplasm
  • Monitoring treatment response in high risk prostate cancer patients using C-11 choline PET/CT
  • Pilot evaluation of 1-amino-2-[18F] fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-2-[18F] FACPC) PET-CT in recurrent prostate carcinoma
Show more Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Prostate/Genitourinary

Prostate/GU Posters

  • Tumor volume in prostate cancer assessed by [11C]Choline PET/CT: Validation with surgical specimen
  • 11C-Choline PET/CT image-guided tomotherapy treatment of lymph nodal relapse in prostate cancer patients
Show more Prostate/GU Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire