Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology-Clinical Diagnosis: GI?Non-colorectal

Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of gall bladder lesions suspicious of malignancy

Manohar Kuruva, Raghava Kashyap Karri, Kamaleshwaran K Karuppusamy, Bhagwant Mittal and Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1222;
Manohar Kuruva
1PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raghava Kashyap Karri
1PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamaleshwaran K Karuppusamy
1PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhagwant Mittal
1PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anish Bhattacharya
1PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1222

Objectives This study was carried out to evaluate the role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of gall bladder lesions suspicious of malignancy.

Methods 24 patients with a suspicion of gall bladder carcinoma on the basis of symptomatology or on conventional imaging modalities were included in the study. Interpretation criteria included SUV greater than SUV of mediastinal blood pool was considered suggestive of malignancy. Correlation with inflammatory markers(CRP) whenever required and available.

Results Out of 24, 21 patients had increased FDG uptake in the gall bladder. SUV values ranged from 5 -14.9 with a mean of 8.2.3 patients did not have increased FDG uptake in the gall bladder. Final diagnosis of gall bladder carcinoma was made in 20. Other 4 had a diagnosis of cholecystitis. FDG PET/CT was true positive in 18/20 patients and false negative in two patients. 4 false positive cases included one case of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and 3 as acute or acute on chronic cholecystitis. Out of 3 patients without increased FDG uptake one was true negative which was later diagnosed as chronic cholecystitis and two patients were false negative on FDG PET/CT were confirmed as mucinous adenocarcinoma. So FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 90%, PPV of 81% and a specificity of 25% and NPV of 33% in predicting the malignant nature of gall bladder lesions. Of the four false positive cases on FDG PET/CT three patients had elevated CRP when taken into consideration specificity increased to 50%.

Conclusions FDG PET /CT is a very sensitive investigation in predicting the malignant nature of gall bladder lesions. Correlation with inflammatory markers would be useful to further increase the specificity

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of gall bladder lesions suspicious of malignancy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of gall bladder lesions suspicious of malignancy
Manohar Kuruva, Raghava Kashyap Karri, Kamaleshwaran K Karuppusamy, Bhagwant Mittal, Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1222;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of gall bladder lesions suspicious of malignancy
Manohar Kuruva, Raghava Kashyap Karri, Kamaleshwaran K Karuppusamy, Bhagwant Mittal, Anish Bhattacharya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1222;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: GI?Non-colorectal

  • Relationship between FDG uptake and the pathological risk category in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
  • Clinical value of FDG-PET for carcinoma of the papilla of Vater
  • Impact of percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage on the diagnostic ability of F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with common bile duct malignancy
Show more Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: GI?Non-colorectal

GI - Non-colorectal Posters

  • Clinical value of FDG-PET for carcinoma of the papilla of Vater
  • Additional value of 18FDG-PET in malignancy diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas
  • Dual-point FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of histopathological response to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer
Show more GI - Non-colorectal Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire