Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetters to the Editor

123I-MIBG Versus 18F-FDG: Which Is Better, or Which Can Be Eliminated?

Thomas F. Heston
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2010, 51 (2) 330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.069401
Thomas F. Heston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 51 no. 2 330
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.069401
PubMed 
20080883

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0161-5505
Online ISSN 
2159-662X
History 
  • Published online February 1, 2010.

Article Versions

  • previous version (January 15, 2010 - 06:02).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2010 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Author Information

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 1 Citations
  • 1 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma
    Gitta Bleeker, Godelieve AM Tytgat, Judit A Adam, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer, Lotty Hooft, Elvira C van Dalen
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015

Article usage

Article usage: January 2010 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 20100025
Feb 20100131128
Mar 201003336
Apr 201002328
May 20100912
Jun 2010077
Jul 20100105
Aug 20100189
Sep 20100136
Oct 20100129
Nov 20100710
Dec 20100106
Jan 201101714
Feb 201101515
Mar 201101112
Apr 20110138
May 2011079
Jun 2011056
Jul 201101414
Aug 201101010
Sep 201101010
Oct 20110510
Nov 201101315
Dec 201101311
Jan 2012076
Feb 2012036
Mar 201201711
Apr 20120910
May 20120108
Jun 20120511
Jul 2012087
Aug 20120159
Sep 20120716
Oct 20120179
Nov 201202714
Dec 20120415
Jan 20130154
Feb 201301312
Mar 20130294
Apr 201301710
May 201301010
Jun 2013065
Jul 2013043
Aug 20130136
Sep 2013052
Oct 2013058
Nov 2013036
Dec 2013031
Jan 2014013
Feb 2014014
Mar 2014041
Apr 2014022
May 2014033
Jun 2014076
Jul 2014056
Aug 2014031
Sep 20140144
Oct 20140233
Nov 2014045
Dec 2014030
Jan 2015011
Feb 2015065
Mar 20150144
Apr 2015041
May 2015042
Jun 2015030
Jul 2015063
Aug 2015051
Sep 2015061
Oct 2015052
Nov 2015061
Dec 20150103
Jan 2016052
Feb 2016065
Mar 20160910
Apr 2016075
May 2016063
Jun 2016063
Jul 2016031
Aug 2016072
Sep 2016053
Oct 2016087
Nov 2016031
Dec 2016080
Jan 2017032
Feb 2017071
Mar 2017074
Apr 2017080
May 2017081
Jun 2017060
Jul 2017060
Aug 2017033
Sep 2017082
Oct 2017072
Nov 2017032
Dec 2017050
Jan 2018031
Feb 2018090
Mar 2018084
Apr 2018090
May 2018051
Jun 2018020
Jul 2018060
Aug 2018050
Sep 2018040
Oct 2018041
Nov 2018092
Dec 2018021
Jan 2019050
Feb 2019031
Mar 2019053
Apr 2019063
May 2019051
Jun 2019042
Jul 2019073
Aug 2019062
Sep 2019052
Oct 20190128
Nov 2019022
Dec 2019074
Jan 20200102
Feb 2020061
Mar 20200104
Apr 2020030
May 2020032
Jun 2020043
Aug 2020022
Sep 2020030
Oct 2020071
Nov 2020032
Dec 2020028
Jan 2021032
Feb 20210108
Mar 2021054
Apr 2021082
May 20210104
Jun 20210141
Jul 2021054
Aug 2021053
Sep 2021032
Oct 202101017
Nov 202101218
Dec 202101713
Jan 20220116
Feb 2022074
Mar 2022064
Apr 20220112
May 2022089
Jun 2022076
Jul 20220111
Aug 20220106
Sep 202201310
Oct 2022036
Nov 2022064
Dec 20220123
Jan 20230149
Feb 2023045
Mar 2023042
Apr 20230111
May 2023075
Jun 2023054
Jul 2023023
Aug 2023037
Sep 2023026
Oct 2023012
Nov 2023023
Dec 2023072
Jan 20240143
Feb 2024023
Mar 20240716
Apr 20240495
May 20240174
Jun 20240385
Jul 202401053
Aug 202409610
Sep 20240103
Oct 20240107
Nov 2024092
Dec 2024089
Jan 20250154
Feb 20250153
Mar 202501213
Apr 202502515
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue 2
February 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
123I-MIBG Versus 18F-FDG: Which Is Better, or Which Can Be Eliminated?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
123I-MIBG Versus 18F-FDG: Which Is Better, or Which Can Be Eliminated?
Thomas F. Heston
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2010, 51 (2) 330; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069401

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
123I-MIBG Versus 18F-FDG: Which Is Better, or Which Can Be Eliminated?
Thomas F. Heston
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2010, 51 (2) 330; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069401
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 176Lu Radiation in Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET Scanners: A Nonissue for Patient Safety
  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Reply to “Routine Dosimetry: Proceed with Caution”
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire