Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Incremental clinical value of a dedicated RT planning FDG PET-CT over staging PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer

Peter Lin, Shalini Vinod, Michael Lin, Ivan HoShon and Seu Som
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 285;
Peter Lin
1Liverpool Hospital, Dept of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shalini Vinod
2Liverpool Hospital, Dept of Rad Onc, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Lin
1Liverpool Hospital, Dept of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan HoShon
1Liverpool Hospital, Dept of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seu Som
1Liverpool Hospital, Dept of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

285

Objectives To evaluate whether a FDG PET scan performed for radiotherapy (RT) planning purpose can detect disease progression, compared with the staging FDG PET.

Methods Thirteen patients (pts) underwent a planning PET-CT for curative RT ("RT-PET") within eight weeks (mean: 28.7 ± 12 days, range:7-54 days) of a staging PET-CT ("Stage-PET") for newly diagnosed untreated NSCLC between 10/2007 and 1/2009. All studies were acquired on a Philips GXL PET-CT using the same protocols, except RT-PET is acquired on a RT flat bed insert in a simulated traetment position. The images were interpreted by consensus readings of two NM physicians: location/number, visual grading (0-4: 3 > liver, 4 > brain), max Transverse diameter ("Max D") (the tumour margin is delineated by a SUV threshhold of 2.5) and max SUV of each lesion. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as >10% increase in max D.

Results RT-PET detected PD (primary or nodal) or new metastases in 8 pts (61%) (mean interval: 30.2 ± 14 days, range: 7-54 days). For primary tumour, RT-PET detected PD in 5 pts (12-32% increase in max D and 12-39% increase in max SUV) and RT-CT detected PD in 3 pts (11-21% increase in max D, paired t test: p = 0.19). Stage-PET detected 28 mediastinal or hilar nodes. RT-PET detected PD in 11of these lesions in 4 pts (31%) and CT detected similar progression in 8 lesions in 2 pts. RT-PET detected 10 new lesions (grade 3 or above and/or SUV >2.5) in 3 pts (23%) resulting in upstaging to N3 in 2 pts (supraclavicular and hilar nodes) and M1 in 1 pt (bone).

Conclusions A dedicated RT planning PET-CT has the potential to detect disease progression and impact on RT in a large number of patients.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incremental clinical value of a dedicated RT planning FDG PET-CT over staging PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Incremental clinical value of a dedicated RT planning FDG PET-CT over staging PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer
Peter Lin, Shalini Vinod, Michael Lin, Ivan HoShon, Seu Som
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 285;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Incremental clinical value of a dedicated RT planning FDG PET-CT over staging PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer
Peter Lin, Shalini Vinod, Michael Lin, Ivan HoShon, Seu Som
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 285;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Prediction of therapy outcome in patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma using dynamic FDG studies
  • Ovarian F-18 FDG uptake in postmenopausal thyroidectomised patients in TSH-stimulated FDG PET/CT
  • Ga-68 DOTATE PET in endocrine tumors: Comparison with SRS, dosimetry, clinical impact
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Lung III

  • Early assessment of therapeutic response using FDG PET in small cell lung cancer
  • Correlation between duration after radiotherapy and FDG accumulation in radiated lung, and FDG-PET diagnostic ability
Show more Lung III

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire