Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist Student Abstract

Variations in arm positions in FDG PET/CT

Rachel Littlejohn, Crystal Botkin, Dana Oliver, Nghi Nguyen and Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 2223;
Rachel Littlejohn
1Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapeutics, Doisy College of Health Sciences, SLU, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Crystal Botkin
1Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapeutics, Doisy College of Health Sciences, SLU, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana Oliver
3SLU Cancer Center, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nghi Nguyen
2Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, SLU, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Medhat Osman
2Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, SLU, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2223

Objectives The SNM published guidelines for arm positions in whole-body (WB) FDG PET/CT. Arms at the side may produce beam-hardening artifacts over the torso. Therefore, the arms should be elevated over the head (arms up or AU) in all cancer cases except in head and neck (H/N) cancer patients where the arms should be positioned at the side (arms down or AD). We evaluated the variation in arm position in our PET center.

Methods 1489 WB PET/CT scans were reviewed and noted for arm positions. The studies were divided into H/N and non-H/N. A note was made when there was a deviation in the arm positioning from the SNM recommendation. Body mass index (BMI), age and gender were also recorded for correlation.

Results Of the 1489 studies reviewed, 1205 (81%) were non-H/N cases, and 284 (19%) were H/N cases. Of the 1205 non-H/N cases, 642 (53%) had AD (no deviation), but 563 (47%) had AU (deviation). Of the 284 H/N cases, 277 (97.5%) had AD (no deviation) and only 7 (2.5%) had AU (deviation). Deviation in arm position showed statistically significant correlations with BMI (p=.001), age (p=.02), and gender (p<.001).

Conclusions Deviation from the SNM’s recommendations for arm positions in FDG PET/CT was 54% for non-H/N cases, but only 2.5% for H/N cases. When present, deviation was more commonly noted in obese patients (BMI>25 due to body habitus), males, or patients over 60 (likely due to shoulder arthritis).

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations in arm positions in FDG PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Variations in arm positions in FDG PET/CT
Rachel Littlejohn, Crystal Botkin, Dana Oliver, Nghi Nguyen, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 2223;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Variations in arm positions in FDG PET/CT
Rachel Littlejohn, Crystal Botkin, Dana Oliver, Nghi Nguyen, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 2223;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist Student Abstract

  • Impact of head holder in reducing misregistration in the area of the head and neck on PET/CT.
  • The use of hepatobiliary scintigraphy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis
Show more Technologist Student Abstract

Technologist Student Papers II

  • Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory Gated Magnetic Resonance-Based Attenuation Correction of PET/MR
  • The Effects of Blood Glucose and Fasting Time on SUV in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients Undergoing an FDG PET/CT Scan.
  • Music therapy sessions to decrease patient anxiety in diagnostic imaging
Show more Technologist Student Papers II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire