Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Comparison of FLT PET and FDG PET for the evaluation of primary head and neck cancer

Yuka Yamamoto, Reiko Kameyama, Hiroshi Hoshikawa and Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1771;
Yuka Yamamoto
1Kagawa University, Dept of Radiology, Kagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reiko Kameyama
1Kagawa University, Dept of Radiology, Kagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Hoshikawa
2Kagawa University, Dept of Otolaryngology, Kagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshihiro Nishiyama
1Kagawa University, Dept of Radiology, Kagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1771

Objectives The nucleoside analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine(FLT) has been introduced for imaging cell proliferation with positron emission tomography (PET). We investigated the feasibility of FLT PET for detection of primary head and neck cancer in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET.

Methods A total of 35 patients with newly diagnosed primary head and neck cancer were examined with both FLT and FDG PET. The tumor site was epipharynx in 4, mesopharynx in 7, hypopharynx in 10, larynx in 8, and tongue in 6. PET imaging was performed at 60 minutes after each radiotracer injection. Tumor lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding that of background uptake. For visualized lesions, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated. All semi-quantitative data were expressed as mean±SD.

Results All 35 primary head and neck cancer showed focally increased uptake of both FLT and FDG. The mean values of FLT SUV in carcinoma of mesopharynx (5.9±3.2), hypopharynx (6.2±3.0), larynx (4.3±2.8), and tongue (6.9±4.4) were significantly lower than the corresponding values of FDG SUV in carcinoma of mesopharynx (10.2±6.1), hypopharynx (13.4±4.4), larynx (6.8±2.1), and tongue (10.7±5.6), respectively (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between FLT SUV (6.9±3.1) and FDG SUV (12.6±2.9) in carcinoma of epipharynx.

Conclusions FLT PET could visualize primary head and neck cancer although uptake of FLT in primary tumor was significantly lower than that of FDG.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of FLT PET and FDG PET for the evaluation of primary head and neck cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of FLT PET and FDG PET for the evaluation of primary head and neck cancer
Yuka Yamamoto, Reiko Kameyama, Hiroshi Hoshikawa, Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1771;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of FLT PET and FDG PET for the evaluation of primary head and neck cancer
Yuka Yamamoto, Reiko Kameyama, Hiroshi Hoshikawa, Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1771;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Detection and evaluation of primary gastric malignancy by gastric expansion with milk immediately before FDG PET scanning
  • Effect of oral glucose loading after standard FDG PET/CT on the detection of liver metastases
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Head & Neck Posters

  • Efficacy of FDG PET/CT for diagnosing synchronous tumors and metastases in head and neck tumors: Initial results and evaluation
  • FMISO PET reflects the pathological characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • 18F-FDG PET in the prediction of survival in untreated advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Usefulness of different PET parameters
Show more Head & Neck Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire