Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

PET-CT evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate.

Giuseppina Biscontini, Marco Nonni, Paolo Cinti, Brunella Rossi and Giorgio Ascoli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1756;
Giuseppina Biscontini
1Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Nonni
1Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Cinti
1Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brunella Rossi
1Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgio Ascoli
1Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1756

Objectives to correlate the changes in tumor density (HU units) and in SUV with the changes in size (RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in metastatic lesions of GIST.

Methods we selected 50 lesions (36 in the liver, 12 abdominal and 2 peri-anastomosis) were evaluated on PET-CT before and 2 months after treatment (imatinib mesylate). We measured change in SUV of each lesion before and after treatment.The percentage of change in the SUV was thengraded on a scale of 1-4: 4: 61-100% decrease, 3: 15-60% decrease; 2: decrease of less than 15% or increase of less than 25%; and 1: increase of 25% or more (these grades were modified from EORTC criteria 1999).For each lesion we measured the CT attenuation coefficient (density) before and after treatment, in Hounsfield units.The percentage of change in tumor density was graded on a scale 1-4: grade 4: decrease of more than 30%; grade 3: 11-30% decrease; grade 2 decrease of 10% or less, or increase of 10% or less; and grade 1 increase of more than 10%. We comparated before and after treatment in each lesion the changes of size (RECIST), SUV uptake (EORTC criteria modified) and density.

Results for all 50 lesions RECIST showed: disease stable in 30/50 (60 %),disease progression in 18/50 and (36 %) and 2/50 partial response (4%).For the percentage of change in tumor density and SUV : 26/50 (52 %) patients was grade 1, 16/50 ( 32 %) grade 2, 4/50 grade 3 (8%) , and 4/50 grade 4 (8%).

Conclusions There was a high correlation between the response based on CT-HU and SUV max.But the changes of tumor size by the RECIST not showed high correlation with PET response.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET-CT evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET-CT evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate.
Giuseppina Biscontini, Marco Nonni, Paolo Cinti, Brunella Rossi, Giorgio Ascoli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1756;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET-CT evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate.
Giuseppina Biscontini, Marco Nonni, Paolo Cinti, Brunella Rossi, Giorgio Ascoli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1756;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Clinical utilities of FDG-PET/CT in small cell lung cancer
  • Value of PET for primary staging of endometrial cancer
  • Prognostic significance of pre-operative FDG-PET in colorectal cancer patients with hepatic metastasis
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

GI-Noncolorectal Posters

  • Initial evaluation of [F-18] alpha-methyl tyrosine PET for differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions
  • Border line for differentiating of pancreas lesions using FDG PET/CT
  • The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic carcinoma
Show more GI-Noncolorectal Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire