Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

FDG SUVmax and DWI ADC for predicting the biological aggressiveness of breast cancers

Masatoyo Nakajo, Yoriko Kajiya, Atsushi Tani, Masako Ueno, Tomoyo Kaneko and Masayuki Nakajo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1694;
Masatoyo Nakajo
1Nanpuh Hospital, Radiology, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoriko Kajiya
1Nanpuh Hospital, Radiology, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Tani
1Nanpuh Hospital, Radiology, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masako Ueno
1Nanpuh Hospital, Radiology, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoyo Kaneko
2Kaneko Clinic, Breast Surgery, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Nakajo
3Kagoshima University Hospital, Radiology, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1694

Objectives To evaluate the usefulness of FDG maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmaxs) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for predicting the biological aggressiveness of breast cancer before therapy.

Methods Thirty three female patients with breast cancers underwent both FDG-PET/CT and 1.5T MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before therapy. Both SUVmaxs and ADCs of breast cancers were calculated. The pathological diagnosis consisted of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC, n=27) and non-invasive ductal carcinoma (NIDC, n=6). The histological grades of IDC were grade 1 (n=3), grade 2 (n=14) and grade 3 (n=10). Both SUVmax and ADC (b =1000) were statistically compared between IDC and NIDC, and among the histological grades in IDC.

Results Thirty of 33 cancers were visible on both FDG-PET and DWI. The 3 invisible cancers were all less than 5mm in diameter. In 30 visible cancers, significant differences were observed in the SUVmax between IDC (6.8±5.0) and NIDC (2.6±1.2) (P=0.023) and in ADC (x10-3mm2/s) between IDC (0.91±0.15) and NIDC (1.06±0.15) (P=0.028). The threshold levels of 2.0 for SUVmax and 1.11 for ADC yielded the same diagnostic values for diagnosing IDC; sensitivity 92% (22/24), specificity 67% (4/6), PPV 92% (22/24), NPV 67% (4/6) and accuracy 87%(26/30). There were also significant differences in SUVmax (grade 1:1.4±0.6, grade 2: 5.9±4.1, grade 3: 9.3±5.3, P=0.008) and in ADC (grade 1: 1.10±0.09, grade 2: 0.98±0.10, grade 3: 0.77±0.06, P<0.001) among 3 grades.

Conclusions These results suggest that both FDG SUVmax and DWI ADC can predict the biological aggressiveness of breast cancers.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FDG SUVmax and DWI ADC for predicting the biological aggressiveness of breast cancers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
FDG SUVmax and DWI ADC for predicting the biological aggressiveness of breast cancers
Masatoyo Nakajo, Yoriko Kajiya, Atsushi Tani, Masako Ueno, Tomoyo Kaneko, Masayuki Nakajo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1694;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
FDG SUVmax and DWI ADC for predicting the biological aggressiveness of breast cancers
Masatoyo Nakajo, Yoriko Kajiya, Atsushi Tani, Masako Ueno, Tomoyo Kaneko, Masayuki Nakajo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1694;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Improved selection of patients for surgery with lung cancer: A retrospective analysis of 415 PET/CT studies in 408 patients
  • Detection and staging accuracy in evaluation of biliary carcinoma – A comparison of PET/CT and MDCT
  • 99mTcN-NOET dual-phase SPECT in detecting mediastinal lymphnode metastasis of pts with lung cancer
Show more Oncology - Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

  • Carcinomas detected with PET/CT from asymptomatic individuals
  • Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in isolated adrenal lesions detected in patients with known malignancy
  • FDG-PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging extends the indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients
Show more Breast/Gynecology/Neuroendocrine/Melanoma/Other Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire