Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: General Practice: Oncology

Role of PET/CT in the management of cancer patients: Referring physicians' perspective

Bhavya Rehani, Pam Strohmeyer, Martin Satters, Martin Jacobs and Joseph Mantil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1332;
Bhavya Rehani
1University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pam Strohmeyer
2Kettering Medical Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dayton, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Satters
2Kettering Medical Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dayton, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Jacobs
2Kettering Medical Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dayton, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Mantil
2Kettering Medical Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dayton, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1332

Objectives The aim of this work was to determine, based on the assessment of referring physicians,the role of PET /CT in the clinical management of various types of cancers.

Methods Between March 2005 and August 2006, PET/CT scans were performed on 1330 patients. Standardized questionnaires were then faxed to all referring physicians before and after the PET/CT. The questionnaire asked them to report on their management plan before and after the PET/CT and whether PET/CT provided any additional information. Surveys were completed in 447 cases. (Response rate, 34%).36 surveys were incomplete and were excluded. 411 Pre and Post PET/CT questionnaires were analyzed.

Results Additional information was provided by PET/CT in 342 (83%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) =79.6-86.82%) patients. Overall, physicians changed their management in 153 patients after the PET/CT i.e. 37% (95% CI= 32.6-41.9%). In patients in which surgical intervention was intended before PET, surgery was avoided in 57%. In patients in whom no treatment was intended before the PET/CT , treatment was started in 23 % after PET/CT . In 19 patients, (12%) intramodality change of management (eg change in chemotherapeutic regimen) was seen. The management change seen in patients with lymphoma, melanoma , lung, breast, colon ,esophageal and head & neck cancer was 37%, 27%, 57%, 24%, 28% , 20% and 55% respectively.

Conclusions This survey-based study of referring physicians indicates that the results of PET/CT have a major impact on management (37%) of patients with various types of cancer.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of PET/CT in the management of cancer patients: Referring physicians' perspective
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Role of PET/CT in the management of cancer patients: Referring physicians' perspective
Bhavya Rehani, Pam Strohmeyer, Martin Satters, Martin Jacobs, Joseph Mantil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1332;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Role of PET/CT in the management of cancer patients: Referring physicians' perspective
Bhavya Rehani, Pam Strohmeyer, Martin Satters, Martin Jacobs, Joseph Mantil
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1332;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: General Practice: Oncology

  • Role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in prediction of survival in recurrent glioma patients
  • Value of SPECT/CT for localizing lesions detected on indium-111 octreotide scintigraphy
Show more General Clinical Specialties: General Practice: Oncology

General Practice-Oncology Posters

  • Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules
  • Prognostic value of Thallium-201 and Tc-99m MIBI scintigraphy in patients with osteosarcoma
  • Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting malignancy in patients with autoimmune disease
Show more General Practice-Oncology Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire