Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherCONTINUING EDUCATION

Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers

Binsheng Zhao, Lawrence H. Schwartz and Steve M. Larson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2009, 50 (2) 239-249; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.056655
Binsheng Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence H. Schwartz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve M. Larson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Images showing no changes in unidimensional or bidimensional measurements but enlargement of tumor along z-axis. (A) Baseline transverse CT image shows tumor contour (outlined in white), greatest diameter, and greatest perpendicular diameter (crossed lines in black) determined by semiautomated segmentation algorithm. (B) Three-dimensional view of segmented tumor on baseline. (C and D) On corresponding follow-up CT images obtained 24 d later, 3-dimensional tumor is seen from same angle along z-axis. Changes in unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements are 0.4%, −4.4%, and 33.2%, respectively. (Reprinted with permission of (16).)

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Images showing no change in tumor size but decrease in tumor density (ghost scenario). (A) Baseline transverse CT image with computer-generated tumor contour, greatest diameter, and 3-dimensional view. (B) On corresponding follow-up CT image obtained 21 d later, tumor is seen from same angle along z-axis. (C) Density histograms of tumor on baseline (white) and follow-up scans (red). Changes in unidimensional and volumetric measurements were 2.1% and −7.8%, respectively. Change in tumor average intensity was −189 Hounsfield unit.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    CT and 18F-FDG PET of bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma, with lesions on baseline CT (A), lesions on corresponding 18F-FDG PET (B), and CT fused with 18F-FDG PET (C). Only regions on PET containing pixels with SUVmax greater than or equal to 2 are visible on fused PET/CT image.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    18F-FDG PET/CT of NSCLC tumor. (A) Baseline hybrid PET/CT performed on patient who had discontinued treatment with gefitinib. One target lesion (arrow) in right lung is indicated on CT (upper row) and on corresponding PET (lower row). (B) PET/CT after 3 wk of no gefitinib treatment. Both size (i.e., maximal tumor diameter) measured on CT and SUVmax measured on 18F-FDG PET increased. Patient then resumed treatment with gefitinib at dose patient was receiving before study entry. (C) PET/CT 3 wk after resumption of treatment. Size did not change, but SUVmax dropped.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    18F-FLT uptake in gastric cancer (arrow) is indicator of rapid tumor cell proliferation: companion CT image through region of stomach mass (upper left), transaxial PET image showing 18F-FLT uptake in gastric mass (arrow; upper right), coronal PET image showing 18F-FLT uptake in gastric mass adjacent to left lobe of liver (bottom right), and fusion image of PET and CT showing 18F-FLT uptake in gastric mass (arrow; bottom left).

  • FIGURE 6. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6. 

    Actively metabolizing tumor with pre- and posttreatment uptake of 18F-FDHT, an androgen ligand radiotracer, in multiple lumbar vertebrae before (left) and after (right) treatment with Medivation, a high-affinity androgen receptor being studied under approved protocol at MSKCC.

  • FIGURE 7. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7. 

    Progression of molecular imaging radioprobe from laboratory to clinic for MSKCC radiotracer that targets HER 2 receptor: 68Ga-Fab′2 trastuzumab (75). Animal studies with human breast tumor xenografts are imaged with small-animal PET (left), and initial study in human patient with metastatic breast cancer (right) causing lytic skull lesion (companion CT image, leftmost image of right panel), with positive uptake on fusion image (rightmost image of right panel).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Molecular Imaging Probes Used at MSKCC

    RadiotracerFunction
    18F-FDG (48)Glycolysis
    18F-FLTProliferation
    11C-methionine (49–51), anti-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutyl-carboxylic acid (52)Amino acid transport
    18F-FES (53)Estrogen receptor
    18F-FDHT (54–56)Androgen receptor
    Na 124INIS
    11C-acetateKrebs cycle, FA syn
    18F-FMISO (57)Hypoxia
    68Ga-Fab′2 trastuzumabHER 2
    124I-cG250Carbonic anhydrase IX
    124I-A33A33 antigen
    124I-3F8GD2
    64Cu-trastuzumabHER 2
    124I-Fluoroiodoarabinosylurideine* (58)Thymidine kinase (herpes virus)
    18F-Fluoroethanylarabinosyluridine* (59)Thymidine kinase (herpes virus)
    • ↵* Gene expression imaging.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 2
February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers
Binsheng Zhao, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Steve M. Larson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2009, 50 (2) 239-249; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056655

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers
Binsheng Zhao, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Steve M. Larson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2009, 50 (2) 239-249; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056655
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • LIMITATION AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENT OF CONVENTIONAL RESPONSE-ASSESSMENT METHODS
    • NEED FOR BETTER RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FOR NSCLC
    • FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN NSCLC
    • FUTURE APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR IMAGING WITH PET
    • TRANSLATION FROM LABORATORY APPLICATIONS TO CLINICAL RESEARCH
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Serial Diffusion MRI to Monitor and Model Treatment Response of the Targeted Nanotherapy CRLX101
  • 17{beta}-Estradiol Augments 18F-FDG Uptake and Glycolysis of T47D Breast Cancer Cells via Membrane-Initiated Rapid PI3K-Akt Activation
  • Preparation, Biological Evaluation, and Pharmacokinetics of the Human Anti-HER1 Monoclonal Antibody Panitumumab Labeled with 86Y for Quantitative PET of Carcinoma
  • Efficacy of PHA-848125, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, on the K-RasG12DLA2 Lung Adenocarcinoma Transgenic Mouse Model: Evaluation by Multimodality Imaging
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians
  • Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire