Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients – Comparison of FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI and tumormarker S-100B

Klaus Strobel, Reinhard Dummer, Hans Steinert, Katrin Baumann-Conzett, Jeannine Skalsky, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Jan Soyka, Thomas Hany, Burkhardt Seifert and Victor Kalff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 365P;
Klaus Strobel
1Nuclear Medicine;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinhard Dummer
2Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Steinert
1Nuclear Medicine;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrin Baumann-Conzett
2Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeannine Skalsky
2Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Veit-Haibach
1Nuclear Medicine;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Soyka
1Nuclear Medicine;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Hany
1Nuclear Medicine;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Burkhardt Seifert
3Biostatistics Unit, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Kalff
4Nuclear Medicine, Alfred Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1541

Objectives: To compare the use of FDG-PET/CT, CT and tumormarker S-100B in chemotherapy response assessment of stage IV melanoma patients.

Methods: In 25 patients with proven melanoma metastases serial PET/CT`s (n=96) and S-100B measurements (n=87) were performed before and during chemotherapy. In patients with suspicion for brain metastases brain MRI (n=18) or CCT (n=14) was performed. The first PET/CT and S-100B measurement was obtained after 2-3 months of chemotherapy and the response was correlated with the survival.

Results: There was complete agreement between PET/CT and CT regarding response to chemotherapy in all patients. There was a nearly significant trend to a longer survival of PET/CT – responders compared with PET/CT non-responders (p=.072) with remarkably better 1-year survival of 80% compared to 40%. S-100B was not suitable for assessment of disease progression in this patient population, being normal in 8/22 patients where it was available and misleading in the remaining 3/14 patients where there was disagreement with PET/CT. Further, chemotherapy response assessment with S -100B failed to show any correlation to survival in these 14 patients (p=.825). Brain metastases were first detected by PET/CT in 2 and by MRI in 9 of 11 patients.

Conclusions: PET/CT and CT alone are equally suitable for chemotherapy response assessment in melanoma patients and clearly superior to S-100B. PET/CT responders have much better early survival. Additional brain MRI is mandatory.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients – Comparison of FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI and tumormarker S-100B
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients – Comparison of FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI and tumormarker S-100B
Klaus Strobel, Reinhard Dummer, Hans Steinert, Katrin Baumann-Conzett, Jeannine Skalsky, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Jan Soyka, Thomas Hany, Burkhardt Seifert, Victor Kalff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 365P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients – Comparison of FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI and tumormarker S-100B
Klaus Strobel, Reinhard Dummer, Hans Steinert, Katrin Baumann-Conzett, Jeannine Skalsky, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Jan Soyka, Thomas Hany, Burkhardt Seifert, Victor Kalff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 365P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Characterization of lung nodules in paediatric Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma by mean (18F)-FDG-PET/CT
  • Dual-time point PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy: Determining the likelihood of malignancy
  • Imaging pediatric lymphoma and other non-CNS tumors with PET/CT – The impact of moving to PET/CT with a diagnostic quality CT component – Experience at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh/University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (CHPUPMC)
Show more Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

  • Comparison of FDG-PET and CT in detection of neoplasia in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS)
  • FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with gallbladder carcinoma detected incidentally during cholecystectomy
  • The high diagnostic value of F-18 FDOPA PET and PET-CT in pheochromocytoma
Show more Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire