Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Clinical impact of FDG-PET in the follow-up or suspicion of recurrent gastric cancer

Yuji Nakamoto, Tsuneo Saga, Tatsuya Higashi, Tadashi Hara, Tsuyoshi Suga and Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 347P;
Yuji Nakamoto
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsuneo Saga
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatsuya Higashi
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadashi Hara
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsuyoshi Suga
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaori Togashi
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1469

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical contribution of positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in patients with follow-up or suspected recurrent gastric cancer.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 85 patients (M:F=56:29) who underwent 111 PET scans from March, 2002 to June, 2007 for post-treatment surveillance of gastric cancer. Of these patients, 43 patients were suspected of having recurrence by other imaging modalities or rising tumor markers (group A), and the remaining 42 patients underwent a PET scan without evidence of recurrence (group B). We only examined results for the first PET study after end of treatment. Diagnostic performance and prevalence of clinical impact of FDG-PET were analyzed. The gold standard was histopathology and/or clinical follow-up for at least 6 months.

Results: 31 patients (72%) had recurrence in group A and 8 patients (19%) in group B. In patient-basis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET were 61%, 67%, 83%, 40%, and 63%, respectively, in group A, and 50%, 94%, 67%, 89%, and 86%, respectively, in group B. There were 13 patients (30%) in group A, for whom PET findings contributed to determining patients’ therapeutic management, while there were only 4 patients (10%) in group B. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were 59%, 87%, 79%, 71%, and 74%, respectively. There were 4 cases (5%), in which positive PET findings depicted not recurrent foci, but spontaneous malignancies, such as lung cancer.

Conclusions: FDG-PET was considered helpful in patients with suspected recurrent gastric cancer, although contribution of PET results may be limited in patients without evidence of recurrence at the time of PET.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 49, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical impact of FDG-PET in the follow-up or suspicion of recurrent gastric cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical impact of FDG-PET in the follow-up or suspicion of recurrent gastric cancer
Yuji Nakamoto, Tsuneo Saga, Tatsuya Higashi, Tadashi Hara, Tsuyoshi Suga, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 347P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical impact of FDG-PET in the follow-up or suspicion of recurrent gastric cancer
Yuji Nakamoto, Tsuneo Saga, Tatsuya Higashi, Tadashi Hara, Tsuyoshi Suga, Kaori Togashi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2008, 49 (supplement 1) 347P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

  • Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with osteosarcoma using FDG PET/CT scan
  • Comparison between FDG uptake and histopathologic parameters in the gastric carcinoma
  • Preliminary experience using PET-CT in pediatric bone and soft tissue tumors
Show more Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

  • Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with osteosarcoma using FDG PET/CT scan
  • Comparison between FDG uptake and histopathologic parameters in the gastric carcinoma
  • Preliminary experience using PET-CT in pediatric bone and soft tissue tumors
Show more Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire