Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors

18F FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma

Andrei Iagaru, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir and I. Ross McDougall
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 88P;
Andrei Iagaru
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Mittra
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Quon
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjiv Gambhir
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Ross McDougall
1Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

297

Objectives: 18F FDG PET/CT is becoming widely available as a powerful imaging modality, combining the ability to detect active metabolic processes and their morphologic features in a single exam. The role of 18F FDG PET was studied in a variety of cancers, including ovarian carcinoma, but its sensitivity and specificity calculations are based on dedicated PET acquisitions, not PET/CT in the majority of the published studies. Therefore, we were prompted to review our experience with PET/CT in the management of patients with ovarian carcinoma. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 43 women with ovarian carcinoma, 27-80 years old (average: 53.9 ± 7.8), who had whole-body PET/CT at our institution from Jan 1st, 2003 to Aug 31st, 2006. Reinterpretation of the imaging studies for accuracy and data analysis from medical records were performed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a 2 × 2 table with pathology results (79.1% of the patients) or clinical follow-up (20.9% of the cases) as the gold standard. Confidence interval (CI) estimations were performed using the Wilson score method. Results: All patients had advanced stage ovarian cancer and the study requested for disease re-staging. A total of 60 scans were performed: 30 pts had 1 scan, 9 pts had 2 scans and 4 pts had 3 scans. The administered doses of 18F FDG ranged 10.3 - 20.8 mCi (average: 15.4 ± 1.98). PET/CT had a sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI: 75.1-95.4) and a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI: 64.4-97.9) for detection of ovarian cancer. The SUV max of the detected lesions ranged 3-27 (average: 9.4±5.9). The CA-125 tumor marker ranged 3-935 kU/ml (average: 265.2) in patients with positive scans and 4-139 kU/ml (average: 17.1) in patients with negative scans. This difference was statistically significant (P value: 0.0242). Conclusions: This study confirms the good results of 18F FDG PET/CT for identification of residual/recurrent ovarian cancer, as well as for distant metastases localization. PET/CT should be an integral part in evaluation of patients with high risk ovarian cancer or rising values of tumor markers (CA-125), prior to selection of the most appropriate therapy.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma
Andrei Iagaru, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir, I. Ross McDougall
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 88P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma
Andrei Iagaru, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir, I. Ross McDougall
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 88P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors

  • 18F-FDG PET benefits for cervical cancer patients with limited supraclavicular lymph node recurrence
  • PET evaluation of bone metastases: Degree of hypermetabolic activity of FDG-PET depends on the degree of osteolytic or osteoblastic component in the bone metastases
  • Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect primary site in cancer of unknown primary
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors

Gynecological Cancers

  • Prognostic implication of metabolic parameters measured by 18F FDG PET/CT in patients of cervical cancer.
  • Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for detection of regional lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer
  • FDG-PET/MRI combined with SPECT/CT guided sentinel lymph node mapping for lymph node staging in patients with early stage cervical and endometrial carcinoma: a prospective study.
Show more Gynecological Cancers

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire