Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Imaging performance of the 2nd generation RatCAP PET scanner

Paul Vaska, Craig Woody, David Schlyer, Veljko Radeka, Paul O'Connor, Jean-Francois Pratte, Sachin Junnarkar, Martin Purschke, Sudeepti Southekal, Sean Stoll, John Neill, Danielle Kaluhiokalani, Dianne Lee, Wynne Schiffer, Jack Fried, Srilalan Krishnamoorthy, Aarti Kriplani, Sri Harsha Maramraju, Roger Lecomte and Rejean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 40P;
Paul Vaska
1Medical;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig Woody
2Physics;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Schlyer
1Medical;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veljko Radeka
3Instrumentation, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul O'Connor
3Instrumentation, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Francois Pratte
3Instrumentation, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sachin Junnarkar
3Instrumentation, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Purschke
2Physics;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudeepti Southekal
4Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Stoll
2Physics;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Neill
5Long Island University, Brookville, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Kaluhiokalani
5Long Island University, Brookville, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dianne Lee
1Medical;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wynne Schiffer
1Medical;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Fried
3Instrumentation, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srilalan Krishnamoorthy
4Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aarti Kriplani
4Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sri Harsha Maramraju
4Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Lecomte
6University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rejean Fontaine
6University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

133

Objectives: The first-generation RatCAP has been used to image phantoms and rat brains using multiple tracers: F-18 FDG, C-11 raclopride, C-11 methamphetamine, and F-18 fluoride. The results have been encouraging on a qualitative level, but a 2nd generation of the RatCAP has been developed to improve physical corrections, sensitivity, time resolution, and flexibility of operation. Methods: A large effort has been devoted to correcting for physical effects by implementing novel strategies which take advantage of the unique properties of the RatCAP. Specifically, corrections have been developed for detector efficiency normalization, coincidence timing offsets, randoms, scatter, and attenuation. In addition, to reduce the statistical noise in the images and streamline the data acquisition, all the hardware components are being upgraded into a 2nd generation design. The LSO scintillators are 2 mm longer giving an approximate factor of 2 increase in coincidence sensitivity but only a minimal increase in size and weight. A new front-end electronic microchip (ASIC) has been designed and fabricated with lower noise and new features including variable gain, thereby improving the time resolution. The chip now sends data to an upgraded time stamp and signal processing module (TSPM) in a more robust differential mode, and the TSPM communicates via optical fibers to a compact PCI card in a standard PC. In parallel, a focus on new approaches to animal behavioral training is expected to soon yield conscious rat brain images. Results: Image quantitation is validated with phantom data under varying conditions of activity and attenuating media. Time resolution and coincidence sensitivity improvements suggest improved noise performance, which is verified with noise equivalent count rate (NECR) measurements. Conclusions: Significantly improved quantitative performance has been enabled with the 2nd generation RatCAP design.

Research Support (if any): DOE OBER funding

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging performance of the 2nd generation RatCAP PET scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging performance of the 2nd generation RatCAP PET scanner
Paul Vaska, Craig Woody, David Schlyer, Veljko Radeka, Paul O'Connor, Jean-Francois Pratte, Sachin Junnarkar, Martin Purschke, Sudeepti Southekal, Sean Stoll, John Neill, Danielle Kaluhiokalani, Dianne Lee, Wynne Schiffer, Jack Fried, Srilalan Krishnamoorthy, Aarti Kriplani, Sri Harsha Maramraju, Roger Lecomte, Rejean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 40P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging performance of the 2nd generation RatCAP PET scanner
Paul Vaska, Craig Woody, David Schlyer, Veljko Radeka, Paul O'Connor, Jean-Francois Pratte, Sachin Junnarkar, Martin Purschke, Sudeepti Southekal, Sean Stoll, John Neill, Danielle Kaluhiokalani, Dianne Lee, Wynne Schiffer, Jack Fried, Srilalan Krishnamoorthy, Aarti Kriplani, Sri Harsha Maramraju, Roger Lecomte, Rejean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 40P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

  • A novel simultaneous beta-and-coincidence-gamma imaging technique for imaging plant leaves
  • Fluorescence-guided occult lesion localization: Comparison with radio-guided occult lesion localization through a simple phantom study
  • Sensitivity of a 2-dimensional gas type detector based on plasma display technology
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

microPET

  • Evaluation of a new readout ASIC for a 1 mm resolution PET system based upon position sensitive avalanche photodiodes
  • In vivo quantification of tumoral radioactivity by microPET: Direct comparison with ex vivo gamma counting
  • A novel four-layer configuration for animal PET scanners with depth of interaction (DOI) measurement
Show more microPET

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire