Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Musculoskeletal

The role of FDG-PET in assessing osteoarthritis

Jagruti Shah, Gonca Bural, Mohamed Houseni and Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 282P;
Jagruti Shah
1Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gonca Bural
1Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed Houseni
1Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
1Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1267

Objectives: To determine the location and degree of FDG uptake on PET in knees for detecting osteoarthritis. Methods: Thirty two patients(age38-77,16M&16F) who had FDG-PET of lower extremities for evaluation of hip or knee prosthesis were included. This population(64 total knees) were divided into two groups(14 knees with prosthesis were excluded from this analysis), first group included 14 knees with osteoarthritis(OA)(based on clinical diagnosis of OA) and control group included 36 knees without OA (no clinical diagnosis of OA). FDG uptake in medial and lateral synovia, joint space and patello-femoral joint was visually assessed and compared to adjacent structures and scored 0-no uptake, 1-mild, 2-moderate and 3-severe. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value(SUVmax) in the same regions of interest including entire knee was measured in both groups. We compared qualitative and quantitative results in knees between the two groups. Results: Average(Avg) SUVmax with Standard Deviation(SD) for medial synovium was 1.1±0.3 in OA group and 0.9±0.2 in control group(p<0.05). FDG uptake in medial synovium in knees with OA was higher than in knees without OA. Avg. SUVmax±SD in lateral synovium, joint space and around entire knee in OA group was higher than that in control group, 1±0.2 versus 0.9±0.2 respectively in lateral synovium, 0.9±0.3 versus 0.7±0.2 respectively in joint space and 1.1±0.2 versus 0.9±0.2 respectively around entire knee. The comparisons did not reach statistical significance in these regions between the two groups likely due to limited population, in spite of a trend of higher values in OA group. There was no difference in avg. SUVmax±SD for patello-femoral joint between the two groups, 0.7±0.2 versus 0.7±0.3 in knees with OA versus control group respectively. With qualitative assessment there was no statistical difference between knees with OA and those without OA. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest a trend towards increasing FDG uptake around entire knee and in particular in medial synovium in patients with OA. The lateral synovium and joint space also had increased FDG uptake in knees with OA. This is suggestive of inflammation in these structures and joint space uptake may be due to cartilage degradation and possibly secondary inflammation. Further studies are needed to determine the role of FDG-PET in this disabling disease.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of FDG-PET in assessing osteoarthritis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The role of FDG-PET in assessing osteoarthritis
Jagruti Shah, Gonca Bural, Mohamed Houseni, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 282P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The role of FDG-PET in assessing osteoarthritis
Jagruti Shah, Gonca Bural, Mohamed Houseni, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 282P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Musculoskeletal

  • Bone mineral density in adult patients with major thalassemia
  • In-vivo evaluation of Lu-177 hydroxyapatite for application in radiation synovectomy of digital joints
  • The prevalence of abnormal joint uptake in the lower extremities on 18F-FDG PET/CT in relation to patient’s age and BMI.
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Musculoskeletal

Musculoskeletal Posters

  • Patterns of vessel involvement in patients referred for possible Giant Cell Arteritis on PET/CT
  • Uptake of [11C]PBR28 and translocator protein specificity in Inflammatory Joint disease
  • Qualitative and quantitative assesment of xBone and xQuant, the most novel SPECT-CT reconstruction methods.
Show more Musculoskeletal Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire