Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties: Endocrinology

Has come the day to do away with thyroid remnant ablation targeting 300 gray (Gy)?

Mario Medvedec and Damir Dodig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 16P;
Mario Medvedec
1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damir Dodig
1Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

53

Objectives: Twenty-four years ago (Maxon HR et al. N Engl J Med 1983 [1]) established absorbed dose thresholds for successful radioiodine-131 (I-131) treatment of thyroid remnants (300 Gy, N=30, p<0.05) and lymph node metastases (80 Gy, N=67, p<0.01) in thyroid cancer patients. Since then, these thresholds have been repeatedly quoted in related dosimetric context. The objective of this work was to review published quantitative studies and to investigate whether the literature, including a subsequent data of original authors, support initial proposal. Methods: Four papers on in-vivo dosimetric quantitation of I-131 therapy for thyroid cancer (Maxon HR et al. J Nucl Med 1992 [2], O'Connell MEA et al. Radiother Oncol 1993 [3], Samuel AM et al. J Nucl Med 1994 [4] and Lassmann M et al. J Nucl Med 2004 [5]) were analysed, together with two presentations of abstracts (Behr TM et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002 [6] and Medvedec M et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004 [7]). The data were adopted from available studies exactly in the form in which they had been published or presented and were analyzed using nonparametric statistics. Results: The absorbed dose of 300 Gy was not statistically proven to be the threshold for successful treatment [2, 3, 4, 5, 7]. Proposed threshold absorbed dose-rate of 3 Gy/h for thyroid remnant ablation [4] was not proven as well. The lowest study-specific thresholds for thyroid remnant ablation were derived as follows: 40 Gy (N=11, p<0.01) [5], 50 Gy (N=39, p<0.01) [3], 150 Gy (N=37, p<0.01) [6], 1.6 Gy/h .AND. 100 Gy [7] (N=40, p<0.05). The latter data has been further supported by the mean absorbed doses of therapeutic I-131 delivered for successful (147±128 Gy) and unsuccessful (41±16 Gy) thyroid remnant ablation (N=23, p<0.05), as presented in abstract by Haq M et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006. Conclusions: Quantitative in-vivo data published so far does not support a widely-accepted dosimetric approach to thyroid remnant ablation based on the threshold absorbed dose of 300 Gy. In contrast, intrathyroidal doses of 40-150 Gy appear to be the range of evidence based cut-off values required for significantly higher success-rate of thyroid remnant ablation with I-131 in postsurical thyroid cancer patients.

  • Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Has come the day to do away with thyroid remnant ablation targeting 300 gray (Gy)?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Has come the day to do away with thyroid remnant ablation targeting 300 gray (Gy)?
Mario Medvedec, Damir Dodig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 16P;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Has come the day to do away with thyroid remnant ablation targeting 300 gray (Gy)?
Mario Medvedec, Damir Dodig
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2007, 48 (supplement 2) 16P;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties: Endocrinology

  • The correlation between salivary gland uptake in pre- and post-ablative 131I whole body scan and late salivary gland side effect after initial radioactive iodine therapy
  • A comparison of the psychological status in the patients with hyperthyroidism before and after treatment with radioiodine-131
  • The frequency of vomiting after outpatient I-131 therapy (tx) in patients (pts) with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC)
Show more General Clinical Specialties: Endocrinology

Thyroid Cancer Updates II

  • Usefulness of 99mTc-pertechnetate SPECT (TSPECT) in remnant mass estimation of post surgical patients of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) during internal dosimetry
  • Radioiodide imaging and therapy of anaplastic thyroid cancer transfected with human sodium iodide symporter coupled with lentiviral system
Show more Thyroid Cancer Updates II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire