Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

In Vitro Evaluation of Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate as an Imaging Agent of Tumor Metabolism

Steve Y. Cho, Josh Polster, James M. Engles, John Hilton, Edward H. Abraham and Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2006, 47 (5) 837-845;
Steve Y. Cho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josh Polster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Engles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Hilton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward H. Abraham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Wahl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    3H-AMP is accumulated in SKOV-3 cells via nucleoside transporter and not by adenosine receptor binding. Uptake in SKOV-3 cells after exposure to 3H-AMP is not inhibited by caffeine (A), an adenosine receptor antagonist, but is inhibited by dipyridamole (B), an ENT inhibitor, in dose-dependent manner.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    3H-AMP is converted to 3H-adenosine before tumor cell uptake via nucleoside transporter. (A) Inhibition of CD73 (ecto-5′-nucleotidase) with APCP (α,β-methylene adenosine-5′-diphosphate) blocks uptake of 3H-AMP (black bars), but not same dose of 3H-FDG (white bars), in dose-dependent manner. (B) 3H-AMP uptake in SKOV-3 cells is competitively inhibited by exposure to increasing concentrations of extracellular unlabeled adenosine.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    (A) Significantly more 3H-AMP than 3H-FDG accumulates in U251 human glioblastoma cells (P < 0.05). 3H-AMP is dephosphorylated by CD73, and 3H-adenosine is taken up by ENT nucleoside transporter in U251 cells. Cells were exposed to 3.7 kBq (0.1 μCi) of radiotracer in vitro. (B) Significantly more 3H-AMP than 3H-FDG accumulates in U87 human anaplastic astrocytoma cells (P < 0.05). Dephosphorylation to 3H-adenosine is required, but transport is predominantly via non–dipyridamole-inhibited ENT route. Cells were exposed to 3.7 kBq of radiotracer in vitro. Dipyr = dipyridamole.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Low uptake of 3H-AMP by Raji cells because of lack of CD73 expression. (A) In Raji cells, uptake of 3H-AMP (*) is very low and uptake of 3H-adenosine is high (P < 0.05). 3H-Adenosine uptake is only partially inhibited by dipyridamole and is competitively inhibited by unlabeled adenosine. CD73 inhibition by APCP does not affect 3H-adenosine uptake. Cells were exposed to 3.7 kBq of radiotracer in vitro. (Daudi cells also showed similarly low uptake of 3H-AMP and high uptake of 3H-adenosine—data not shown.) (B) Extracellular CD73 is expressed on SKOV-3 cells but not on Raji cells. Viable cells were selected by physical parameters, size, and internal complexity (upper left graphs). Immunophenotyping of these viable cells was compared using cells labeled with phycoerythrin-conjugated CD73 antibody and control cells without antibody labeling. Cell fluorescence intensity is graphed on y-axis and cell physical parameter on x-axis for control cells (lower left graphs) and CD73-labeled cells (lower right graphs). These graphs are also represented as number of cells on y-axis versus fluorescence intensity on x-axis (upper right graphs). Consistent with CD73 expression, intensity of fluorescence is greater on SKOV-3 cells labeled with CD73 than on control cells. However, Raji cells did not show difference in fluorescence intensity between cells labeled with CD73 and control cells. (Daudi cells were also negative for CD73—data not shown.)

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Nucleoside transporter characterization reveals that SKOV-3 cells possess primarily hENT1s. (A) 3H-Adenosine uptake is inhibited by low nanomolar concentrations of NBMPR in Na+-free physiologic solution. (B) No evidence is seen of concentrative Na+-dependent 3H-adenosine transport in SKOV-3 cells in physiologic or Na+-free physiologic buffer.

  • FIGURE 6. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6. 

    Nucleoside transporter characterization of U87 cells. U87 cells possess both ENTs and CNTs. ENT appears to be NBMPR resistant. (A) 3H-Adenosine uptake is not inhibited by nanomolar or micromolar concentrations of NBMPR in Na+-free physiologic solution. (B) Evidence is seen of concentrative Na+-dependent 3H-adenosine transport in SKOV-3 cells in physiologic or Na+-free physiologic buffer.

  • FIGURE 7. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7. 

    Schematic diagram of proposed mechanism of intracellular uptake of 3H-AMP based on the in vitro experiments performed in this project.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    3H-AMP Retention in SKOV3 Cells After 1 Hour of Uptake Followed by Washout with 3H-AMP–Free Medium

    Washout
    ParameterUptake (1 h)30 min1 h2 h
    Average DPM/106 cells ± SD734,745 ± 13,559701,518 ± 26,336584,989 ± 33,927588,245 ± 10,249
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Determination of Intracellular Adenylate and Inosine Species in SKOV-3 Cells

    SpeciesTotal intracellular 3H-labeled nucleosides (%)
    ATP34.5–38.5
    ADP45.9–52.1
    AMP1.3–1.5
    Inosine6.0–11.7
    • Data are result of 2 experiments.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 5
May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Evaluation of Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate as an Imaging Agent of Tumor Metabolism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
In Vitro Evaluation of Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate as an Imaging Agent of Tumor Metabolism
Steve Y. Cho, Josh Polster, James M. Engles, John Hilton, Edward H. Abraham, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2006, 47 (5) 837-845;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vitro Evaluation of Adenosine 5′-Monophosphate as an Imaging Agent of Tumor Metabolism
Steve Y. Cho, Josh Polster, James M. Engles, John Hilton, Edward H. Abraham, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2006, 47 (5) 837-845;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Anti-CD73 antibody therapy inhibits breast tumor growth and metastasis
  • The role of positron emission tomography in the management of non-small cell lung cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
  • Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer
  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire