Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes

Jo S. Nettleton, Richard S. Lawson, Mary C. Prescott and Ian D. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2004, 45 (1) 138-146;
Jo S. Nettleton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard S. Lawson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary C. Prescott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian D. Morris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Typical testicular sections from subject In2 (A) and subject In4 (B), administered intravenously with 111In chloride.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Typical testicular sections from subject Tl1 (A) and subject Tl2 (B), administered intravenously with 201Tl chloride.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Uptake of 111In Chloride: Results for Individual Subjects

    SubjectTime of administration before orchidectomy (h)Total sub-capsular testis weight (g) (both testes)Subject weight (kg)%IA/g (nonspecific)%IA/g (mean ± SE) gross testis%IA/g (mean ± SE) seminiferous tubules%IA/g (mean (1, 2))* epididymis%IA/mL (mean (1, 2))* blood
    In124.517.8550.00180.0070 ± 0.00070.0050 ± 0.00050.00250.0080
    (1 sample)(0.0078, 0.0082)
    In225.039730.00140.0069 ± 0.00010.0036 ± 0.00020.00320.0074
    (1 sample)(0.0072, 0.0076)
    In324.027.6460.00220.0052 ± 0.00020.0022 ± 0.00040.00390.006
    (0.0036, 0.0042)(0.0059, 0.0061)
    In425.028.2710.00140.0043 ± 0.00130.0031 ± 0.00030.00180.0021
    (0.0017, 0.0019)(0.0019, 0.0023)
    In546.520.61030.00100.0044 ± 0.00220.0022 ± 0.00010.00310.0042
    (0.0027, 0.0035)(0.0040, 0.0044)
    In647.042.01200.00080.0023 ± 0.00010.0010 ± 0.00010.00170.0021
    (1 sample)(0.0021, 0.0021)
    • ↵* (1, 2) are individual of 2 samples for each subject when only 2 samples were obtained.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Uptake of 201Tl Chloride: Results for Individual Subjects

    SubjectTime of administration before orchidectomy (h)Total subcapsular testis weight (g) (both testes)Subject weight (kg)%IA/g (nonspecific)%IA/g (mean ± SE) gross testis%IA/g (mean ± SE) seminiferous tubules%IA/mL (mean (1, 2))* blood
    Tl125.041.0720.00140.0060 ± 0.00020.0050 ± 0.00020.00010
    (0.0001, 0.0001)
    Tl224.515.0690.00150.0060 ± 0.00100.0020 ± 0.00010.00020
    (0.0002, 0.0002)
    Tl322.323.8780.00130.0050 ± 0.00060.0040 ± 0.00010.00010
    (0.00009, 0.00011)
    Tl425.729.2760.00130.0051 ± 0.00010.0030 ± 0.00020.00020
    (0.00017, 0.00023)
    Tl545.021.4700.00140.0052 ± 0.00020.0032 ± 0.00010.00010
    (1 sample)
    Tl647.012.4600.00170.0050 ± 0.00090.0026 ± 0.00070.00020
    (1 sample)
    • ↵* (1, 2) are individual of 2 samples for each subject when only 2 samples were obtained. No results for epididymis.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Summary Results for 111ln Chloride: Concentration Above Levels Expected for Nonspecific Uptake as Proportion of Body Mass

    Mean injection time before surgery (h)%IA/g of gross testicular tissue (mean ± SE)%IA into testes* (mean ± SE)Multiple of nonspecific %IA/g of tissue (mean ± SE or (1, 2)†)
    Gross testicular tissueSeminiferous tubulesEpididymisBlood
    24.60.0058 ± 0.00070.20 ± 0.023.56 ± 0.552.14 ± 0.401.68 ± 0.233.49 ± 0.85
    46.80.00330.123.641.732.613.41
    (0.0044, 0.0023)(0.15, 0.08)(4.40, 2.88)(2.20, 1.26)(3.10, 2.12)(4.20, 2.62)
    • ↵* In Tables 3 and 4, values of percentage uptake into testes as a whole are based upon mean values of uptake per gram of gross testicular tissue, combined with standard weight of 35 g.

    • ↵† (1, 2) are individual of 2 samples for each subject when only 2 samples were obtained.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Summary Results for 201TI Chloride: Concentration Above Levels Expected for Nonspecific Uptake as Proportion of Body Mass

    Mean injection time before surgery (h)%IA/g of gross testicular tissue (mean ± SE)%IA into testes* (mean ± SE)Multiple of nonspecific %IA/g of tissue (mean ± SE or (1, 2)†)
    Gross testicular tissueSeminiferous tubulesBlood
    24.40.0055 ± 0.00030.19 ± 0.014.01 ± 0.092.57 ± 0.490.11 ± 0.02
    46.00.00510.183.321.90.09
    (0.0052, 0.005)(0.18, 0.17)(3.70, 2.94)(2.28, 1.52)(0.07, 0.11)
    • ↵* In Tables 3 and 4, values of percentage uptake into testes as a whole are based upon mean values of uptake per gram of gross testicular tissue, combined with standard testicular weight of 35 g.

    • ↵† (1, 2) are individual of 2 samples for each subject when only 2 samples were obtained.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Values of Absorbed Dose to Testes and Effective Dose for 111ln Chloride Using Different Models of Biologic Clearance from Testis

    ModelTesticular self-dose (mGy/MBq)Total testicular absorbed dose (mGy/MBq)Effective dose (mSv/MBq)
    ICRP (17,30,31)0.0150.0530.21
    This work
     Model I0.134 ± 0.0130.172 ± 0.0130.22 ± 0.001
     Model II0.168 ± 0.0170.206 ± 0.0170.22 ± 0.002
     Model III0.096 ± 0.0140.135 ± 0.0140.22 ± 0.001
    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    Values of Absorbed Dose to Testes and Effective Dose for 201Tl Chloride Using Different Models of Biologic Clearance from Testis

    ModelTesticular self-dose (mGy/MBq)Total testicular absorbed dose (mGy/MBq)Effective dose (mSv/MBq)
    ICRP (30,32)0.4420.450.17
    This work
     Model I0.105 ± 0.0060.113 ± 0.0060.14 ± 0.001
     Model II0.136 ± 0.0070.144 ± 0.0070.14 ± 0.001
     Model III0.111 ± 0.0160.118 ± 0.0160.14 ± 0.002
    • View popup
    TABLE 7

    Comparison of Results for Uptake of 111ln and 201Tl From Our Research with Those Reported in Other Studies

    ReferenceRadionuclideMeasurement time after administration (h)ModelNo. of subjects%IA into testes
    Hoyes et al. (20)114mln24Rat60.2
    This work111ln24Human40.20
    This work111ln48Human20.12
    Rao et al. (5)201Tl24Human (imaging)40.46
    Atkins et al. (14)201Tl24Human (imaging)30.15
    Hosain and Hosain (15)201Tl24Human (imaging)0.8
    Gupta et al. (18)201Tl24Human (imaging)1.0
    Samson et al. (19)201TlUnknownHuman (postmortem)20.11
    Atkins et al. (14)201Tl24Dog10.7
    This work201Tl24Human40.19
    This work201Tl48Human20.18
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 45, Issue 1
January 1, 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Supplement "PET/CT: Imaging Function and Structure"
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes
Jo S. Nettleton, Richard S. Lawson, Mary C. Prescott, Ian D. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2004, 45 (1) 138-146;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Uptake, Localization, and Dosimetry of 111In and 201Tl in Human Testes
Jo S. Nettleton, Richard S. Lawson, Mary C. Prescott, Ian D. Morris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2004, 45 (1) 138-146;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Small-Scale Anatomic Model for Testicular Radiation Dosimetry for Radionuclides Localized in the Human Testes
  • MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 20: Radiation Absorbed-Dose Estimates for 111In- and 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan
  • Radiation-Absorbed Dose from 201Tl-Thallous Chloride
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire