Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Matthias Eiber, Markus Kroenke, Alexander Wurzer, Lena Ulbrich, Lena Jooß, Tobias Maurer, Thomas Horn, Kilian Schiller, Thomas Langbein, Gabriel Buschner, Hans-Jürgen Wester and Wolfgang Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 696-701; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234914
Matthias Eiber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Kroenke
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Wurzer
2Chair of Radiopharmacy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lena Ulbrich
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lena Jooß
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Maurer
3Department of Urology and Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Horn
4Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kilian Schiller
5Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Langbein
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Buschner
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jürgen Wester
2Chair of Radiopharmacy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Weber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET tracers are increasingly used in preference to 68Ga-PSMA-11 for restaging biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer. They are associated with longer half-lives, larger-scale production, and lower positron range than their 68Ga-labeled counterparts. Here, we describe the efficacy of an 18F-labeled radiohybrid PSMA, rhPSMA-7, a novel theranostic PSMA-targeting agent for imaging BCR of prostate cancer. Methods: Datasets from 261 consecutive patients with noncastrate BCR after radical prostatectomy who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT at our institution between June 2017 and March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. All lesions suspected of being recurrent prostate cancer were recorded. The detection rate for sites of presumed recurrence was correlated with patients’ prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, primary Gleason score, and prior therapy (androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiation therapy). Results: The 261 patients had a median PSA level of 0.96 ng/mL (range, 0.01–400 ng/mL). The median injected activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7 was 336 MBq, with a median uptake time of 76 min. In total, 211 patients (81%) showed pathologic findings on 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT. The detection rates were 71% (42/59), 86% (44/51), 86% (42/49), and 95% (76/80) at PSA levels of 0.2 to <0.5 ng/mL, 0.5 to <1 ng/mL, 1 to <2 ng/mL, and ≥2 ng/mL, respectively. In 32% patients (7/22) with a PSA of less than 0.2 ng/mL, suggestive lesions were present. 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT revealed local recurrence in 43% of patients (113). Lymph node metastases were present in the pelvis in 42% of patients (110), in the retroperitoneum in 17% (45), and in a supradiaphragmatic location in 8.0% (21). Bone and visceral metastases were detected in 21% (54) and 3.8% (10), respectively. Detection efficacy was not influenced by prior external-beam radiation therapy (79.1% vs. 82.1%, P = 0.55), androgen deprivation therapy within the 6 mo preceding imaging (80.6% vs. 80.9%, P = 0.54), or primary Gleason score (77.9% for ≤7 vs. 82.6% for ≥8, P = 0.38). Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT offers high detection rates in early BCR after radical prostatectomy, especially among patients with low PSA values.

  • biochemical recurrence
  • hybrid imaging
  • PET
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen

Prostate cancer relapse after curative-intent primary treatment remains a considerable clinical burden. Up to approximately one third of patients experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer in the 10 y after initial treatment (1,2). The utility of standard imaging for the localization of recurrence is limited, especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (3). In recent years, investigational prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–based radiotracers have demonstrated encouraging results in the early detection of prostate cancer recurrence. The expression of membrane-bound enzyme PSMA is significantly higher in prostate cancer cells than in healthy tissue (4), and the extracellular location of its catalytic site permits easy targeting with specific inhibitors that become internalized after ligand binding (5).

The PSMA-based radiotracer 68Ga-PSMA-11 compares favorably with an existing agent, choline, in terms of image contrast and detection rate (6). A recent large, retrospective study revealed 68Ga-PSMA-11 to detect recurrent prostate cancer with high specificity, and a metaanalysis of data from over 1,300 patients reported a pooled, subject-level 68Ga-PSMA detection rate of 76% for BCR of prostate cancer (7,8). Most recently, a prospective bicentric study confirmed the high sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in patients with low PSA values and reported a high positive predictive value for 68Ga-PSMA-11–positive lesions (9). 18F-labeled PSMA radiotracers are also under clinical evaluation and offer several potential advantages such as a longer half-life, larger-batch production, and lower positron range than their 68Ga-labeled counterparts. 18F-DCFPyL is a second-generation small-molecule PSMA inhibitor that is currently under investigation in a phase III study (NCT03739684), and a further example, 18F-PSMA-1007, shows a favorable profile, with low bladder excretion (10).

Radiohybrid PSMA (rhPSMA) ligands are a new class of theranostic PSMA-targeting PET agents with several favorable features, including a fast process for radiolabeling with 18F and radiometals (11). The lead compound in this class, 18F-rhPSMA-7, has shown promising initial data for the detection and localization of recurrent prostate cancer, as well as rapid blood clearance (11). Given that accumulation of PET agents in the bladder and ureter can interfere with the diagnosis of recurrent disease and hamper assessment of primary disease (12–14), 18F-rhPSMA-7 has notably low bladder retention when imaging 1 h after injection (11).

Here, we present the results of a retrospective study investigating the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 for detection and localization of recurrent disease in a large, homogeneous series of noncastrate patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Data from patients with BCR of prostate cancer who underwent clinically indicated 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT between June 2017 and March 2018 at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Only patients who had undergone primary radical prostatectomy with curative intent or salvage radical prostatectomy after external-beam radiation therapy were included. Patients with documented castrate-resistant disease were excluded from the analysis. The patients’ serum PSA level at the time of the PET/CT was recorded along with details of prior therapy.

All patients gave written informed consent for the procedure. All reported investigations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and with national regulations. The retrospective analysis was approved by the local Ethics Committee (permit 290/18S). Administration of 18F-rhPSMA-7 complied with the German Medicinal Products Act, AMG §13 2b, and the responsible regulatory body (government of Oberbayern).

Synthesis and Administration of 18F-rhPSMA-7

18F-rhPSMA-7 was synthesized as described previously (11). A median activity of 336 MBq of 18F-rhPSMA-7 (mean, 333 ± 44 MBq; range, 191–417 MBq) was administered by intravenous bolus at a median of 76 min (mean, 82 ± 22 min; range, 50–220 min) before scanning. An uptake time of around 1 h (50–70 min) is recommended for future use, on the basis of an additional investigation of biodistribution at different time points (11).

Imaging Protocol

All patients underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT on a Biograph mCT flow scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). A diagnostic CT scan was performed in the portal venous phase 80 s after intravenous injection of contrast agent (Iomeron 300), followed by the PET scan. All patients received diluted oral contrast medium (300 mg of ioxitalamate [Telebrix; Guerbet]). All PET scans were acquired in 3-dimensional mode with an acquisition time of 1.1 mm/s. Emission data were corrected for randoms, dead time, scatter, and attenuation and were reconstructed iteratively by an ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm (4 iterations, 8 subsets) followed by a postreconstruction smoothing gaussian filter (5 mm in full width at half maximum).

Image Analysis

Images were reviewed by an experienced, board-certified nuclear medicine physician and a board-certified radiologist. All lesions suspected of being recurrent prostate cancer were noted. Any focal tracer uptake higher than the surrounding background and not associated with physiologic uptake was considered suggestive of malignancy. Typical pitfalls in PSMA-ligand PET imaging were considered, such as low-to-moderate PSMA expression associated with osteoblastic changes (i.e., with fractures or degenerative changes) or the low uptake associated with celiac and other ganglia (15). All lesions suggestive of recurrent prostate cancer were noted and categorized as local recurrence (prostate bed), lymph node metastases (stratified further by location as pelvic, retroperitoneal, or supradiaphragmatic), bone metastases, or other metastases (e.g., lung or liver).

Statistical Analysis

The detection rate for sites of presumed recurrence was plotted against the baseline PSA value for both patient-level recurrence (number of patients with at least 1 positive finding) and regional level (local recurrence, lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and other metastases as detailed above). The patient-level detection rate was correlated with primary Gleason score and prior therapy (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] and external-beam radiation therapy).

Two-sample t tests were used to evaluate differences between single groups (Gleason score, ADT), and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to evaluate differences in PSA values between groups with and without pathologic uptake. All tests were 2-sided and used a significance level of α = 5%. Statistical analyses were conducted with MedCalc software (version 13.2.0).

RESULTS

In total, 261 patients were included in this study. They had a median age of 72 y and a median prescan PSA level of 0.961 ng/mL; 67 (26%) had received ADT within the 6 mo preceding the scan (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics (n = 261)

18F-rhPSMA-7 Detection Efficacy

Detection Rate

Of the 261 patients, 211 (81%) showed one or more localized areas suggestive of recurrent prostate cancer. The detection efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT correlated positively with PSA level and was 95% (76/80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.99) for a PSA value of ≥2 ng/mL, 86% (42/49; 95% CI, 0.73–0.95) for a PSA value of 1 to <2 ng/mL, 86% (44/51; 95% CI, 0.74–0.94) for a PSA value of 0.5 to <1 ng/mL, 71% (42/59; 95% CI, 0.58–0.82) for a PSA value of 0.2 to <0.5 ng/mL, and 32% (7/22; 95% CI, 13.7–54.9) for a PSA value of <0.2 ng/mL (Fig. 1). The mean PSA level was significantly lower among patients with negative results on 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT than among those with positive results (P = 0.004; Table 2).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Overall detection rate of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET stratified by PSA value.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

PSA Level in Patients with Positive Vs. Negative 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT Results

Lesion Location

18F-rhPSMA-7–avid lesions were detected in both prostatic and extraprostatic regions as shown in Table 3. Regional positivity also broadly increased with increasing PSA level (Fig. 2). Local recurrence in the prostate bed ranged from 18% at PSA < 0.2 ng/mL to 49% at PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL, whereas pelvic lymph node metastases were present in 14% at PSA < 0.2 ng/mL to 64% at PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL. Although retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were rare at lower PSA levels, 36% of patients with PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL had positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Distant lymph node metastases were rare in very early BCR, with no supradiaphragmatic lymph node metastases observed at PSA < 0.5 ng/mL. However, 20% of patients with PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL were found to have positive supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes. Bone metastases were visible early in the recurrence timeline. 18F-rhPSMA-7–avid bone lesions were present in 9% of patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL and 33% of patients with PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL. Visceral metastases were absent or low across all PSA levels. Only 7.5% of patients with PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL were found to have visceral metastases. Figure 3 and Supplemental Figures 1 and 2 present example images from the study (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Distribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7–Avid Lesions Stratified by PSA Value

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Presence of 18F-rhPSMA-7–avid lesions stratified by PSA value.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Set of images from 77-y-old patient who underwent radical prostatectomy in 2015 (Gleason score of 9, pT3b, pN1) and was experiencing rising PSA (0.15 ng/mL). (A) Whole-body maximum-intensity projection shows 4 sites with focal PSMA-ligand uptake in pelvis (arrows). (B–G) Axial fused PET/CT and CT images demonstrate local recurrence at anastomosis (B and C, arrow), additional local recurrence at dorsal bladder wall (D and E, arrow), and tiny lymph node metastasis in right pelvis (F and G, arrow). Targeted external-beam radiation treatment lead to subsequent PSA drop.

Influence of Prior Therapy and Primary Histologic Differentiation

We observed no significant difference between the detection rate among patients who had previously received external-beam radiation therapy (79% [83/105]) and those who had not (82% [128/156], P = 0.55). Receiving ADT in the 6 mo preceding the scan also did not appear to affect the results (81% [54/67] for prior ADT compared with 81% [157/194] for no prior ADT, P = 0.54). When considering the histologic differentiation at the primary diagnosis, 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT was positive in 78% (95/122) of patients with a Gleason score of 7 or less and in 83% (72/87) of patients with a Gleason score of at least 8 (P = 0.38).

DISCUSSION

A PSA level of greater than 0.2 ng/mL is the current definition of BCR of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (16–18). A rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy usually precedes a clinically detectable recurrence by years (19). However, as it cannot differentiate between local, regional, or systemic disease, precise imaging techniques are required to identify areas of involvement to facilitate the delivery of optimized therapy.

The performance of conventional imaging techniques, such as 11C-choline PET, is limited at low PSA values, and its use is not recommended for patients with a PSA level of below 1 ng/mL (3,20,21). PSMA-targeting tracers, particularly 68Ga-PSMA-11, have been shown to more effectively determine the site of disease and, as a result, have had a major impact on patient management (7,22). Although not currently approved by the European Medicines Agency or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET is in increasing use in research studies, where it has shown encouraging results.

In the present retrospective analysis investigating a large, homologous cohort of patients with BCR after prostatectomy, the novel PSMA-targeting radiotracer 18F-rhPSMA-7 was shown to be highly effective for prostate cancer restaging, with the site of disease recurrence being located in 81% of all patients and in 95% of those with a PSA level of 2 ng/mL or greater. Common with other PET tracers, the detection rate for 18F-rhPSMA-7 increases with increasing PSA level (23–25).

Previous data suggest that 18F-labeled PSMA tracers can achieve higher detection rates than reported for 68Ga-labeled PSMA, especially at low PSA values, and the present data corroborate this, notably for PSA levels of less than 0.5 ng/mL (26). The different energy profiles of 18F and 68Ga may play a role in the enhanced detection of 18F-labeled PSMA tracers; theoretically, the achievable resolution of 18F is higher than that of 68Ga (26,27). Our data indicate that, in general, 18F-rhPSMA-7 detects suspected BCR at a rate equivalent to that reported for 68Ga-PSMA-11, but in patients with very low PSA values (especially below 0.5 ng/mL) higher rates have been observed than reported for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (8,23). However, only limited conclusions can be drawn from comparisons with the literature. Patient cohorts can vary substantially between different reports, and sophisticated protocols (e.g., forced diuresis or additional delayed imaging) might further influence the performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 by allowing for better assessment of local disease (28). The 18F-rhPSMA-7 detection rate in our retrospective analysis is similar to that recently published for 18F-PSMA-1007 (26).

The previously described low urinary retention of 18F-rhPSMA-7 at 1 h after injection might have an ancillary effect on the enhanced detection efficacy (11). High accumulation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in the bladder during imaging is known to impair detection of small local recurrences, especially if near the bladder (14). In a recent study of a large cohort undergoing 68Ga-PSMA-11-imaging, local recurrence was present in 20% and 30% at PSA ranges of 0.2–0.5 and 0.5–1.0 ng/mL, respectively (29), compared with 46% and 41%, respectively, in the present study (Table 3). Differences in the patient cohorts may also have influenced results, and on the basis of different protocols, 68Ga-PSMA-11 retention in the bladder can be reduced (28).

Improved detection during very early recurrence is of great clinical importance to tailoring the salvage therapy approach. Salvage radiotherapy for patients with increasing PSA after prostatectomy provides the best chance for cure when delivered early (3,30,31). When salvage radiotherapy is delivered before the patient’s PSA reaches 0.5 ng/mL, more than 60% of patients will achieve an undetectable PSA level, and there is an approximately 80% chance of being progression-free at 5 y (32–36). Because of their ability to identify disease foci early in the recurrence timeline, multiple PET agents have been shown by recent studies to have clinical utility in influencing the future management of a patient (24,37,38). It was further shown that detection of lymph nodes and distant metastases has the highest impact on patient management (22).

Despite a largely homologous cohort, we evaluated the impact of primary histologic classification and prior treatment on the detection rate for 18F-rhPSMA-7. In our patient cohort, the detection rate for 18F-rhPSMA-7 was broadly consistent across a range of Gleason scores. Despite data indicating that PSMA overexpression increases with Gleason score (39), these reports focus mainly on the Gleason score of the primary tumor. In fact, a patient cohort presenting with BCR might already imply selection of more aggressive phenotypes of prostate cancer; the initial primary Gleason score might therefore be less relevant.

Some preliminary studies also suggest that the use of ADT may evoke overexpression of PSMA (40), but this may be a temporal relationship that requires further study. The use of ADT at the time of scanning has been shown to be associated with positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET results more frequently than does scanning of those not receiving ADT (8), and a recent case study demonstrated an increased number of lesions after 4 wk of treatment with ADT despite a lower PSA level (40). However, similar to our previous study with 68Ga-PSMA-11, we showed here that the use of ADT within the 6 mo preceding the scan did not significantly influence the detection rate with 18F-rhPSMA-7 (23). In addition, patients with prior ADT exposure are likely to have more advanced disease than those who have not received ADT, thus potentially highlighting a substantial confounding factor for such data in the literature. In general, the role of ADT in the uptake of PSMA-based tracers is highly controversial. At a cellular level, ADT appears to moderately increase PSMA expression, but the treatment may also cause a decrease in the number of tumor cells, constituting an effect in the opposite direction (40).

Similarly to recently published data for 18F-PSMA1007 (41), we observed PSMA-ligand uptake in the bones, which could partly be attributed to uptake not specific to prostate cancer. PSMA-ligand uptake in healing bone fractures, degenerative changes, or fibrocartilage lesions has been described previously (15,42,43). In this scenario, CT plays an important role, and its respective findings are essential for a correct differential diagnosis. The assessment of uptake not related to prostate cancer, using 18F-rhPSMA-7, is currently under investigation by our group.

Finally, we must emphasize that 18F-rhPSMA-7 yields a substantial logistical advantage over 68Ga-labeled counterparts, as the former can be produced with high yield (50%–70%) using automated radiosynthesizers within a short time frame (<1,000 s) at room temperature (11). The simple radiosynthesis is easily conducted in a manner compliant with good manufacturing practices, resulting in production of batches with activity suitable for distribution to offsite PET centers. In addition to logistical advantages, the true theranostic approach with rhPSMA ligands, including 18F labeling, is potentially beneficial for applications outside early BCR. In the field of prostate cancer, a highly prevalent disease, pretherapeutic dosimetry using PET imaging with 18F might become a relevant application of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy.

Our retrospective analysis is subject to limitations. First, in common with most studies investigating PSMA-ligand PET imaging, we lacked histopathologic confirmation of the detected lesions. As known from other investigations, many recurrent lesions in prostate cancer are small and difficult to biopsy. However, when histopathologic validation has been used, results confirmed the high positive predictive value of PSMA-based PET agents (44). Second, we acknowledge that our study was retrospective, with the associated inherent limitations. Nevertheless, it provided substantial evidence for designing future prospective trials.

CONCLUSION

In this large population of patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, a novel PSMA-based PET tracer, 18F-rhPSMA-7, offered high detection rates that were at least equal to data reported for 68Ga-PSMA-11, especially at low PSA values. Such detection early in the recurrence timeline indicates the potential for 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET to guide future salvage therapy.

DISCLOSURE

Hans-Jürgen Wester, Alexander Wurzer, and Matthias Eiber are named as inventors on a patent application for rhPSMA. Hans-Jürgen Wester and Matthias Eiber received funding from the SFB 824 (DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 824, project B11) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany, and from Blue Earth Diagnostics (licensee for rhPSMA) as part of an academic collaboration. Hans-Jürgen Wester is a founder, shareholder, and advisory board member of Scintomics GmbH, Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany. Matthias Eiber and Wolfgang Weber are consultants for Blue Earth Diagnostics. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: What is the detection efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA7 PET/CT in noncastrate patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: 18F-rhPSMA7 PET/CT offer high detection efficacy in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer—efficacy at least equal to data published for 68Ga-PSMA-11.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: If approved in the future, 18F-rhPSMA7 will allow patients easier and wider access to PSMA-ligand PET imaging.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 13, 2019.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roehl KA,
    2. Han M,
    3. Ramos CG,
    4. Antenor JA,
    5. Catalona WJ
    . Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172:910–914.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Simmons MN,
    2. Stephenson AJ,
    3. Klein EA
    . Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1175–1184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mottet N,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Briers E,
    4. et al
    . EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer: 2017 update. European Association of Urology website. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-ESUR-ESTRO-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-large-text-V2.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2020.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Silver DA,
    2. Pellicer I,
    3. Fair WR,
    4. Heston WD,
    5. Cordon-Cardo C
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ghosh A,
    2. Heston WD
    . Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:528–539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Zechmann CM,
    3. Malcher A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Perera M,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Christidis D,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:926–937.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Avtzi E,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Calais J,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:856–863.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Hadaschik B,
    3. Cardinale J,
    4. et al
    . F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:678–688.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wurzer A,
    2. Di Carlo D,
    3. Schmidt A,
    4. et al
    . Radiohybrid ligands: a novel tracer concept exemplified by 18F- or 68Ga-labeled rhPSMA-inhibitors. J Nucl Med. 2020;61: 735–742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Weirich G,
    3. Holzapfel K,
    4. et al
    . Simultaneous 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:829–836.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Haberkorn U,
    3. Schlemmer HP,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:887–897.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Freitag MT,
    2. Radtke JP,
    3. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    4. et al
    . Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy is at risk to be missed in 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET of PET/CT and PET/MRI: comparison with mpMRI integrated in simultaneous PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:776–787.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Hicks RJ,
    3. Maurer T,
    4. Eiber M
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET: clinical utility in prostate cancer, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38:200–217.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bruce JY,
    2. Lang JM,
    3. McNeel DG,
    4. Liu G
    . Current controversies in the management of biochemical failure in prostate cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012;10:716–722.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Goonewardene SS,
    2. Phull JS,
    3. Bahl A,
    4. Persad R
    . Interpretation of PSA levels after radical therapy for prostate cancer. Trends Urology Men’s Health. 2014;5:30–34.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cookson MS,
    2. Aus G,
    3. Burnett AL,
    4. et al
    . Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;177:540–545.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pound CR,
    2. Partin AW,
    3. Eisenberger MA,
    4. Chan DW,
    5. Pearson JD,
    6. Walsh PC
    . Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–1597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Krause BJ,
    2. Souvatzoglou M,
    3. Tuncel M,
    4. et al
    . The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:18–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Castellucci P,
    2. Fuccio C,
    3. Rubello D,
    4. et al
    . Is there a role for 11C-choline PET/CT in the early detection of metastatic disease in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with a mild PSA increase <1.5 ng/ml? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:55–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Han S,
    2. Woo S,
    3. Kim YJ,
    4. Suh CH
    . Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74:179–190.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Souvatzoglou M,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Andriole GL,
    2. Kostakoglu L,
    3. Chau A,
    4. et al
    . The impact of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluciclovine on the management of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: results from the LOCATE trial. J Urol. 2019;201:322–331.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Giovacchini G,
    2. Picchio M,
    3. Briganti A,
    4. et al
    . [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging. J Urol. 2010;184:938–943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Knorr K,
    3. Spohn F,
    4. et al
    . Detection efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–368.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sanchez-Crespo A
    . Comparison of gallium-68 and fluorine-18 imaging characteristics in positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:55–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Schmuck S,
    2. Nordlohne S,
    3. von Klot CA,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of standard and delayed imaging to improve the detection rate of [68Ga]PSMA I&T PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence or prostate-specific antigen persistence after primary therapy for prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:960–968.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Rauscher I,
    2. Duwel C,
    3. Haller B,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy, predictive factors, and prediction nomograms for 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in early biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73:656–661.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Emmett L,
    2. van Leeuwen PJ,
    3. Nandurkar R,
    4. et al
    . Treatment outcomes from 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-informed salvage radiation treatment in men with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy: prognostic value of a negative PSMA PET. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1972–1976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sterzing F,
    2. Kratochwil C,
    3. Fiedler H,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:34–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wiegel T,
    2. Lohm G,
    3. Bottke D,
    4. et al
    . Achieving an undetectable PSA after radiotherapy for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of biochemical outcome: results of a retrospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:1009–1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    1. Stish BJ,
    2. Pisansky TM,
    3. Harmsen WS,
    4. et al
    . Improved metastasis-free and survival outcomes with early salvage radiotherapy in men with detectable prostate-specific antigen after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3864–3871.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.
    1. Pfister D,
    2. Bolla M,
    3. Briganti A,
    4. et al
    . Early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1034–1043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    1. Siegmann A,
    2. Bottke D,
    3. Faehndrich J,
    4. et al
    . Salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: what is the best time to treat? Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:239–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Ohri N,
    2. Dicker AP,
    3. Trabulsi EJ,
    4. Showalter TN
    . Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:837–844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Goldstein J,
    2. Even-Sapir E,
    3. Ben-Haim S,
    4. et al
    . Does choline PET/CT change the management of prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure? Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40:256–259.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hope TA,
    2. Aggarwal R,
    3. Chee B,
    4. et al
    . Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on management in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1956–1961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Sheehan CE,
    3. Fisher HA,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:6357–6362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hope TA,
    2. Truillet C,
    3. Ehman EC,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging of response to androgen receptor inhibition: first human experience. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:81–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Rauscher I,
    2. Krönke M,
    3. König M,
    4. et al
    . Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:51–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Sheikhbahaei S,
    2. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:2117–2136.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Jochumsen MR,
    2. Dias AH,
    3. Bouchelouche K
    . Benign traumatic rib fracture: a potential pitfall on 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT for prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:38–40.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Rauscher I,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Beer AJ,
    4. et al
    . Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the assessment of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: comparison with histopathology after salvage lymphadenectomy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1713–1719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication August 8, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication October 30, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 5
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Matthias Eiber, Markus Kroenke, Alexander Wurzer, Lena Ulbrich, Lena Jooß, Tobias Maurer, Thomas Horn, Kilian Schiller, Thomas Langbein, Gabriel Buschner, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Wolfgang Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 696-701; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234914

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Matthias Eiber, Markus Kroenke, Alexander Wurzer, Lena Ulbrich, Lena Jooß, Tobias Maurer, Thomas Horn, Kilian Schiller, Thomas Langbein, Gabriel Buschner, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Wolfgang Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 696-701; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234914
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • True-Positive 18F-Flotufolastat Lesions in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence with Baseline-Negative Conventional Imaging: Results from the Prospective, Phase 3, Multicenter SPOTLIGHT Study
  • Unspecific 18F-PSMA-1007 Bone Uptake Evaluated Through PSMA-11 PET, Bone Scanning, and MRI Triple Validation in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
  • Validation of 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET Imaging Results with Histopathology from Salvage Surgery in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
  • Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of 177Lu-Labeled Radiohybrid PSMA Ligands for Endoradiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
  • Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET for Imaging of Primary Prostate Cancer and Preoperative Efficacy in N-Staging of Unfavorable Intermediate- to Very High-Risk Patients Validated by Histopathology
  • 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Curative-Intent Radiation Therapy: A Bicentric Retrospective Study
  • Pretherapeutic Comparative Dosimetry of 177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • The Influence of Specific Activity on the Biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical PET Data
  • Detection Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT and Impact on Management in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy and Before Potential Salvage Treatment
  • Combination of Forced Diuresis with Additional Late Imaging in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: Effects on Lesion Visibility and Radiotracer Uptake
  • Matched-Pair Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in Patients with Primary and Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Frequency of Non-Tumor-Related Uptake and Tumor Positivity
  • Comparative Preclinical Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Endoradiotherapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 19F/177Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 and 177Lu-PSMA I&T
  • Positive Predictive Value and Correct Detection Rate of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer Validated by Composite Reference Standard
  • Safety, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in Healthy Adult Volunteers
  • Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biochemical recurrence
  • hybrid imaging
  • PET
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire