Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communication

The Influence of Specific Activity on the Biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical PET Data

Thomas Langbein, Alexander Wurzer, Andrei Gafita, Andrew Robertson, Hui Wang, Ayça Arçay, Michael Herz, Hans-Juergen Wester, Wolfgang A. Weber and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 742-745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262471
Thomas Langbein
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Wurzer
2Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Gafita
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
3Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Robertson
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Wang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayça Arçay
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Herz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Juergen Wester
2Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Weber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

We investigated whether the time between synthesis and injection and the resulting decrease in specific activity affects the normal-organ and tumor uptake of the PSMA ligand 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: The biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 on PET/CT scans obtained with a high specific activity (median, 178.9 MBq/µg; n = 42) and a low specific activity (median, 19.3 MBq/µg; n = 42) was compared. Results: Tracer uptake by the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and spleen was moderately but significantly lower in the low-specific-activity group than in the high-specific-activity group (median SUVmean, 16.7 vs. 19.2; 18.1 vs. 22.3; and 7.8 vs. 9.6, respectively). No other statistically significant differences were found for normal organs or tumor lesions. Conclusion: A 10-fold decrease in specific activity has only minor effects on the biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. These findings suggest that 18F-labeled PSMA ligands can be centrally produced and shipped to PET clinics in a similar way to 18F-FDG.

  • PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • biodistribution
  • molar activity
  • 18F

Several 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands are currently in clinical development for imaging of patients with prostate cancer (1–3). In the future, it is envisioned that these ligands will be produced by central radiopharmacies in batch sizes similar to 18F-FDG and shipped to PET clinics. In such a setting, radioactive decay will lead to a continuous decrease in the specific activity of the PSMA ligands. This decrease in specific activity could, in principle, lead to lower tumor uptake, since the 18F-labeled PSMA ligands compete with the nonlabeled PSMA ligands for binding to the limited number of PSMA molecules. Such a saturation of tracer uptake by a nonradioactive precursor does not occur for 18F-FDG because 18F-FDG follows the flow of glucose, which is present at concentrations that are orders of magnitude higher.

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 represents the lead compound in a class of radiohybrid PSMA (rhPSMA) ligands that can be labeled with 18F for imaging but also with radiometals for therapeutic use (4). 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 is a single diastereoisomer form of 18F-rhPSMA-7, for which promising preliminary imaging data have been reported (5,6). Two multicenter, phase III trials are in progress to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in primary staging (NCT04186819) and recurrence (NCT04186845) of prostate cancer.

Preclinical investigations have shown that the biodistribution of 18F-labeled PSMA ligands in mice is significantly affected by the specific activity, with decreased uptake in tumor lesions and salivary glands at lower specific activities (7). The present study explored whether such effects also occur in humans over the range of specific activities typically injected for PSMA PET/CT studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT at our institution between August 2018 and October 2019 (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). All reported investigations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and with national regulations. The retrospective analysis was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Technical University Munich (permit 290/18S), and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 administration complied with the German Medicinal Products Act, Arzneimittelgesetz §13 2b, and the responsible regulatory body (Government of Oberbayern).

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 Synthesis, Administration, and Image Acquisition

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 was synthesized as recently reported (4) and administered as an intravenous bolus (median, 321 MBq; interquartile range [IQR], 290–360 MBq) at a median of 71 min (IQR, 66–79 min) before the PET/CT scan began. Patients underwent 18F‐rhPSMA‐7.3 PET/CT on a Biograph mCT flow scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions) as recently described (5,6).

Patient Selection

The patients had received the injection of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 at various time points after production and, consequently, had been administered different specific activities of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. The specific activity at the time of tracer injection was calculated for every patient using the exact time of injection, the injected activity, and the radiolabeling quality control data for the particular batch, while accounting for the known radioactive decay of 18F. Two patient groups were created (high or low specific activity), aiming for a 10-fold difference between groups. In addition, groups were matched for uptake time and body weight, and only patients with a low tumor load were included to avoid tumor sink effects. A low tumor load was defined as no more than 1% of total injected dose accumulated in tumor lesions determined by isocontour volume-of-interest measurements at 50% of the SUVmax.

Biodistribution Assessment

SUVmean was determined within standardized isocontour volumes of interest with 50% of the SUVmax and a diameter of 30 mm (salivary glands, liver, spleen, kidneys, bone, muscle, blood pool, and tumor lesions). For evaluation of the tumor uptake, volumes of interest were placed over a maximum of 3 lesions per patient in decreasing order of the SUVmax, and SUVmean was averaged. The image-derived whole-organ radioactivity concentration (kBq/mL) based on full-organ segmentation (salivary glands, liver, spleen, and kidneys) was determined using semiautomatic analysis with the software qPSMA as previously described (8). Volume-of-interest placement and image analyses were performed by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians.

Statistical Analysis

The Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for differences between uptake parameters between the high- and the low-specific-activity groups. Additionally, a 1-way multivariate AVOVA was performed to analyze the effect of specific activities on biodistribution. Normal distribution of variables was evaluated by Q–Q plots and the Shapiro–Wilk W test. Data are presented as median and IQR; a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics, version 24 (IBM Corp.), and MedCalc, version 14.8.1 (MedCalc Software Ltd.).

RESULTS

Patient Population

From a total of 1,975 patients, 84 were selected and stratified into 2 groups of equal size. The median interval between tracer synthesis and injection was 72 min (IQR, 54–89 min) versus 367 min (IQR, 342–397 min) for the high and low groups (P < 0.001), resulting in a median specific activity of 178.9 MBq/µg (IQR, 158.6–199.1 MBq/µg) and 19.3 MBq/µg (IQR, 17.7–22.5 MBq/µg), respectively, for 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 (P < 0.001). Median injected activity per kilogram of body weight (4.0 MBq/kg [IQR, 3.9–4.0 MBq/kg] vs. 4.0 MBq/kg [IQR, 3.9–4.0 MBq/kg]) and median 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 uptake time (70 min [IQR, 65–76 min] vs. 75 min [IQR, 68–87 min]) were similar in the high and low groups (P = 0.62 and 0.06, respectively). No substantial differences between the groups were present for any clinical parameter (Supplemental Table 1). Supplemental Table 2 provides data for specific activities at calibration and injection.

Normal-Organ Biodistribution and Tumor Lesions Evaluated by SUVmean

Median SUVmean in the low-specific-activity group was significantly lower for parotid glands (P = 0.014), submandibular glands (P = 0.002), and spleen (P = 0.012) (Fig. 1; Supplemental Table 3). No significant differences in SUVmean were found for the other investigated organs. Median SUVmean was 9.0 (IQR, 4.4–14.8) and 9.5 (IQR, 6.5–19.0) for tumor lesions in the high- versus low-specific-activity groups, respectively, and not significantly different (P = 0.273). No statistical difference in tumor lesion distribution was observed between the 2 groups (Supplemental Fig. 2).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 SUVmean stratified by injected specific activity. n.s. = not statistically significant.

Whole-Organ Radioactivity Concentrations

Whole-organ radioactivity concentrations (kBq/mL) for the high- versus low-specific-activity groups were 39.6 (IQR, 34.8–48.0) versus 29.4 (IQR, 26.5–37.0), 46.9 (IQR, 38.9–58.1) versus 35.8 (IQR, 28.6–43.2), 15.7 (IQR, 12.6–19.4) versus 15.1 (IQR, 12.4–17.5), 21.1 (IQR, 18.4–28.1) versus 16.5 (IQR, 12.2–20.0), and 69.3 (IQR, 60.0–78.6) versus 64.6 (IQR, 52.1–72.1) for the parotid glands, submandibular glands, liver, spleen, and kidneys, respectively. Results for the low-specific-activity group were significantly lower for salivary glands and spleen (each P < 0.001), whereas liver and kidneys did not show significant differences (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 whole-organ radioactivity concentration stratified by injected specific activity. n.s. = not statistically significant.

A 1-way multivariate ANOVA confirmed the statistically significant difference between the high- and low-specific-activity groups for tracer distribution determined by SUVmean and full-organ segmentation (combined dependent variables, F14,60 = 3.928, P < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.478, Wilks Λ = 0.522.)

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective analysis, we explored the impact of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 specific activity on biodistribution in normal organs and tumors. Our data show that uptake patterns in organs relevant to clinical imaging interpretation are not substantially affected by different specific activities, with only the salivary glands and spleen demonstrating a moderate, albeit significant, decrease in the low- compared with high-specific-activity groups. Tumor uptake appeared stable over the 10-fold difference investigated. Our results indicate that clinical PET interpretation is not affected using a single large-batch production over several hours during the workday and the resultant wide range of injected specific activities.

Similar effects have already been demonstrated by Soeda et al. in a preclinical setting (7). In a mouse xenograft model derived from human lymph node metastases, a substantial decline in the SUVmean of tumor lesions and salivary glands was observed on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT when the molar activity was reduced over a 100-fold range (7). Despite decreased tumor uptake, the tumor–to–salivary gland ratio increased as salivary gland uptake was even further reduced compared with tumors. The authors concluded that the increased tumor–to–salivary gland ratio might play a role in reducing off-target uptake of PSMA-targeting radioligand therapies. Comparable findings have been demonstrated with 68Ga-labeled PSMA inhibitors using triazacyclononane-triphosphinate chelators (9). By the addition of unlabeled compounds, the accumulation was altered significantly in the kidneys and salivary glands but less so in the tumor, with a more beneficial kidney-to-tumor ratio in lower molar activities of 8 versus 1,200 MBq/nmol (9).

To translate these animal data into a clinical context, 2 different methodologies for detection of imaging-derived biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 were applied. Recently, the biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 was investigated in 6 healthy subjects, with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 showing high physiologic uptake in the kidneys and salivary glands (10). Our study demonstrated that uptake by most organs is not influenced by administration of lower specific activities, as might occur in a busy PET clinic. This consistency of uptake appears essential for a clinical PET/CT reading. Additionally, tumor uptake did not vary significantly, even with a 10-fold difference in the injected specific activity.

This difference in specific activity represents the realistic spectrum of what is observed in a real-world scenario for PET imaging. Although some of the mentioned preclinical findings could also be observed in our investigation with significant effect, they appeared to be without clinical relevance in the case of salivary gland and spleen uptake. Notably, because therapeutic applications usually require higher molar masses (∼50–200 µg), our data cannot be extrapolated to the potential therapeutic use of rhPSMA-7.3.

The results of our study indicate that salivary gland uptake is saturable, suggesting binding to a target protein within the salivary glands. Similar findings were shown in preclinical studies of 177Lu-PSMA-617, for which uptake in the salivary glands and kidneys of PC3-PIP tumor–bearing mice significantly declined without an impact on tumor uptake when cold PSMA-11 was added (11).

Some limitations of our study should be considered, for example, the retrospective design. However, we believe that our observations are true reflections of the variance in specific activity in daily clinical practice. Second, our cohort comprised a relatively heterogeneous patient group at different stages of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, we tried to control for any potential influence on biodistribution, selecting patients on the basis of a low tumor load. The heterogeneous population and the known high variance of in vivo PSMA expression might explain the wide range of reported SUVmean in tumor lesions.

In summary, our data suggest that a single production of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 can be used in a clinical setting throughout the whole working day without a clinically relevant effect on biodistribution, especially tumor lesion uptake, despite a significantly decreasing specific activity. This observation underlines the potential logistical and economic advantages of 18F-labeled PSMA ligands resulting from a single large-batch production in a cyclotron facility over generator-produced 68Ga-based ligands with a short half-life and the need for multiple batches throughout the day (12).

CONCLUSION

Differences in the injected specific activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 observed throughout a usual working day have no clinically relevant effect on biodistribution and, especially, uptake by tumor lesions. These results support central production of 18F-labeled PSMA ligands with shipment to PET clinics, similarly to 18F-FDG.

DISCLOSURE

There is a patent application for rhPSMA (Matthias Eiber, Alexander Wurzer, and Hans-Juergen Wester). Matthias Eiber and Wolfgang Weber are consultants for Blue Earth Diagnostics (licensee for rhPSMA). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Does the specific activity of the radiopharmaceutical administered to a patient affect the way it is distributed among organs?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: This retrospective data review showed that although the salivary glands and spleen appear to be saturable with decreasing specific activities, there was no clinically meaningful difference in organ uptake in patients with prostate cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: A single batch of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 can be used throughout the day to scan multiple patients, with no effect on image quality being observed between the first and last patients of the day.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Editorial support was provided by Dr. Catriona Turnbull (Blue Earth Diagnostics).

Footnotes

  • Guest Editor: Ken Herrmann, Universitätsklinikum Essen

  • Published online Aug. 12, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dietlein M,
    2. Kobe C,
    3. Kuhnert G,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:575–584. pmid:26013479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Hadaschik B,
    3. Cardinale J,
    4. et al
    . F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:678–688. pmid:27889802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Derlin T,
    3. Lapa C,
    4. et al
    . 18F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging. Theranostics. 2020;10:1–16. pmid:31903102
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wurzer A,
    2. DiCarlo D,
    3. Schmidt A,
    4. et al
    . Radiohybrid ligands: a novel tracer concept exemplified by 18F- or 68Ga-labeled rhPSMA-inhibitors. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:735–742. pmid:31862804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Kronke M,
    3. Wurzer A,
    4. et al
    . 18F-rhPSMA-7 positron emission tomography for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:696–701. pmid:31836682
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kroenke M,
    2. Wurzer A,
    3. Schwamborn K,
    4. et al
    . Histologically-confirmed diagnostic efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 positron emission tomography for N-staging of patients with primary high risk prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:710–715. pmid:31836681
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Soeda F,
    2. Watabe T,
    3. Naka S,
    4. et al
    . Impact of 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake in prostate cancer using different peptide concentrations: preclinical PET/CT study on mice. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1594–1599. pmid:30902876
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gafita A,
    2. Bieth M,
    3. Kronke M,
    4. et al
    . qPSMA: Semiautomatic software for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1277–1283. pmid:30850484
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wurzer A,
    2. Pollmann J,
    3. Schmidt A,
    4. Reich D,
    5. Wester HJ,
    6. Notni J.
    Molar activity of Ga-68 labeled PSMA inhibitor conjugates determines PET imaging results. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:4296–4302. pmid:30011372
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tolvanen T,
    2. Kalliokoski KK,
    3. Malaspina S,
    4. et al
    . Safety, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in healthy adult volunteers. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:679–684. pmid:33067338
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kalidindi TM,
    2. Lee SG,
    3. Jou K,
    4. et al
    . A simple strategy to reduce the salivary gland and kidney uptake of PSMA-targeting small molecule radiopharmaceuticals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2642–2651. pmid:33495926
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kesch C,
    2. Kratochwil C,
    3. Mier W,
    4. Kopka K,
    5. Giesel FL.
    68Ga or 18F for prostate cancer imaging? J Nucl Med. 2017;58:687–688. pmid:28408526
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  • Received for publication April 25, 2021.
  • Revision received August 5, 2021.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Influence of Specific Activity on the Biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical PET Data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Influence of Specific Activity on the Biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical PET Data
Thomas Langbein, Alexander Wurzer, Andrei Gafita, Andrew Robertson, Hui Wang, Ayça Arçay, Michael Herz, Hans-Juergen Wester, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 742-745; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262471

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Influence of Specific Activity on the Biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical PET Data
Thomas Langbein, Alexander Wurzer, Andrei Gafita, Andrew Robertson, Hui Wang, Ayça Arçay, Michael Herz, Hans-Juergen Wester, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 742-745; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262471
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of an Ultra-Low-Dose PET Scan Protocol with CT-Based and LSO-TX–Based Attenuation Correction Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Scanner
  • Prostate Cancer Recurrence Due to Isolated Testicular Metastases Detected by PSMA PET/CT
  • First-in-Human Serum Stability Studies of [177Lu]Lu-AMTG: A Step Toward Improved GRPR-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
Show more Brief Communication

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • biodistribution
  • molar activity
  • 18F
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire