Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Cardiac motion-corrected quantitative dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging

Jing Tang, Frank Bengel and Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 123;
Jing Tang
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Bengel
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

123

Objectives In the context of dynamic cardiac imaging, gating information is not routinely utilized. Our goal is to introduce gated motion correction within dynamic Rb-82 reconstruction and to evaluate its effect on the quantitative estimation of tracer transport between blood and myocardial tissue.

Methods Making use of the list-mode acquisition capability along with gating information, we propose to first estimate motion from reconstructed single-frame, multi-gated images obtained by binning the acquired data, starting after initial blood uptake (i.e. from ~0.5min to 2min). Next, starting from time of injection, for each dynamic frame, the gated data would be combined within a 4D EM reconstruction algorithm that incorporates the estimated motion. To validate, stress time activity curves of blood pool, myocardium, and other organs, as extracted from Rb-82 PET images of 5 normal patients, were averaged and smoothed, and used to simulate a 5D NCAT phantom with both gates (8 gates) and dynamic frames (10 frames*12 sec). Analytical simulation was performed to simulate gated, dynamic noise-free PET data, which were scaled to clinical count levels before 30 Poisson noise fluctuations were created. Image reconstruction was performed, without and with motion correction for each dynamic frame. Kinetic rate constants were extracted from the noise-free and noisy reconstructed images using a two-compartment model, and compared between the conventional and proposed methods.

Results With gate-motion-corrected (4D) reconstruction for each dynamic frame, the estimated K1 values in each of the five regions (anterior, septal, inferior, lateral, and apex) were shown to be significantly increased relative to no motion-correction in both noise-free and noisy cases (p<0.0001). The average increase of K1 in both the noise-free and noisy case was 33% over the 5 regions, with the motion-corrected estimation close to the truth (5% error).

Conclusions Incorporation of cardiac motion correction within dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging was shown to improve the accuracy of estimated K1 values compared to no motion correction

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cardiac motion-corrected quantitative dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cardiac motion-corrected quantitative dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging
Jing Tang, Frank Bengel, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 123;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cardiac motion-corrected quantitative dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging
Jing Tang, Frank Bengel, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 123;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • CT attenuation correction for the quantitative 123I-IMP CBF SPECT image reconstruction
  • Correction for partial volume effect at different ratios between spill-in and spill-out
  • Comparison of ordered subset implementations for EM, preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA) and conjugate gradient (PCG) optimization tasks in PET image reconstruction
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation: PET

  • Maximum likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity (MLAA) based extended mu-maps for dynamic and gated MR-PET
  • Impact of 90Y-PET reconstruction parameters on dose volume histograms in post-implantation dosimetry of selective intravascular radionuclide therapy (SIRT)
  • Contribution of the modeling of point spread function and time-of-flight technology on the image quality of a PET/CT system
Show more Image Generation: PET

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire