Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Comparison of ordered subset implementations for EM, preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA) and conjugate gradient (PCG) optimization tasks in PET image reconstruction

Hassan Mohy-ud-Din, Jing Tang, Dean Wong and Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1997;
Hassan Mohy-ud-Din
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Tang
2Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dean Wong
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1997

Objectives To investigate quantitative accuracy of images obtained via ordered subset (OS) implementations for maximum likelihood optimization in PET image reconstruction

Methods PET image reconstruction is commonly performed by maximization of the Poisson log-likelihood (LL) function; and may be achieved via the EM algorithm or numerical optimization methods. The EM algorithm can be formulated as fixed step-size special case of preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA), while PSA and preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) algorithms perform step-size optimization for each new direction. In the present work, the concept of ordered subsets (OS), commonly applied to achieve OS-EM, was also applied to result in OS-PSA and OS-PCG. In the context of simulated 3D brain imaging tasks, these algorithms were compared in terms of LL convergence and their noise vs. bias performance.

Results Without subsets, PSA and PCG algorithms can converge faster than the EM algorithm (though producing overlapping noise vs. bias trade-off curves). However, the OS-PCG algorithm is seen to converge significantly more poorly relative to both OS-EM and OS-PSA algorithms (asymptotic normalized LL error (NLLE) larger by factors of 1.76 and 2.48 respectively). This is attributed to the fact that while the PCG technique may have theoretical advantages compared to moving in the direction of steepest ascent, this effect disappears for OS data due to inherent inconsistencies between the data subsets. Furthermore, OS-EM is seen to outperform OS-PSA in terms of NLLE as well as noise vs. bias trade-off performance (10-15% reduced noise; matched bias).

Conclusions Usage of the PCG algorithm in the OS context is not recommended, while OS-PSA and especially OS-EM algorithms pose more favorable alternatives. In applications where the EM solution does not exist (e.g. non-linear 4D parametric imaging), usage of OS-PSA optimization is instead recommended

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of ordered subset implementations for EM, preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA) and conjugate gradient (PCG) optimization tasks in PET image reconstruction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of ordered subset implementations for EM, preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA) and conjugate gradient (PCG) optimization tasks in PET image reconstruction
Hassan Mohy-ud-Din, Jing Tang, Dean Wong, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1997;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of ordered subset implementations for EM, preconditioned steepest ascent (PSA) and conjugate gradient (PCG) optimization tasks in PET image reconstruction
Hassan Mohy-ud-Din, Jing Tang, Dean Wong, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1997;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • CT attenuation correction for the quantitative 123I-IMP CBF SPECT image reconstruction
  • Correction for partial volume effect at different ratios between spill-in and spill-out
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • On Enhancing Monte-Carlo Scatter Correction for Y90 Bremsstrahlung SPECT using Guided Filtering
  • Data-driven rigid motion correction of PET brain images using list mode reconstruction
  • Simultaneous Attenuation Correction and Reconstruction of PET Images Using Deep Convolutional Encoder Decoder Networks from Emission Data
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire