Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study

Jinbo Yue, Lusheng Chen, Alvin R. Cabrera, Xindong Sun, Shuqiang Zhao, Fu Zheng, Anqin Han, Jinsong Zheng, Xuezhong Teng, Li Ma, Yidong Ma, Dali Han, Xianguang Zhao, Dianbin Mu, Jinming Yu and Yuhui Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2010, 51 (4) 528-534; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.072124
Jinbo Yue
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lusheng Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alvin R. Cabrera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xindong Sun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuqiang Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fu Zheng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anqin Han
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinsong Zheng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuezhong Teng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yidong Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dali Han
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xianguang Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dianbin Mu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinming Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuhui Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to use serial 18F-3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT to measure tumor cell proliferation during radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. Methods: Twenty-one patients with inoperable locally advanced SCC of the esophagus underwent serial 18F-FLT PET/CT during radiotherapy. Each patient received a pretreatment scan, followed by 1–3 scans after delivery of 2, 6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 Gy to the tumor. Results: Among the 19 patients who completed radiotherapy without interruption, parameters reflecting 18F-FLT uptake in the tumor (i.e., maximum tumor standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and proliferation target volume) decreased steadily. All patients demonstrated an almost complete absence of proliferating esophageal tumor after 30 Gy and a complete absence after 40 Gy. In the 2 patients whose radiotherapy course was interrupted, 18F-FLT uptake in the tumor was greater after the interruption than before the interruption. Marked early reduction of 18F-FLT uptake in irradiated bone marrow was observed in all patients, even after only 2 Gy. All showed a complete absence of proliferating marrow in irradiated regions after 10 Gy. Both patients who underwent scans after completing the entire radiotherapy course showed no tumor uptake on 18F-FLT PET/CT but high uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Pathologic examination of these regions revealed inflammatory infiltrates but no residual tumor. Conclusion: 18F-FLT uptake can be used to monitor the biologic response of esophageal SCC and normal tissue to radiotherapy. Increased uptake of 18F-FLT after treatment interruptions may reflect accelerated repopulation. 18F-FLT PET/CT may have an advantage over 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating inflammation from tumor.

  • esophageal carcinoma
  • accelerated repopulation
  • radiotherapy

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. With definitive chemoradiation, however, 2-y survival is only 30%−40% and locoregional failure 50%, even with high doses of radiation (1,2). Treatment effectiveness may be limited by accelerated repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells, which can be stimulated by therapeutic interventions such as radiotherapy and which has been shown to contribute to radiation resistance in several malignancies, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. Analysis by Kajanti et al. (3) investigating the effect of overall treatment time on local control in radical radiotherapy for SCC of the esophagus suggested that because of repopulation, shortening of overall treatment time could be beneficial.

The development of 18F-3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine (FLT) as a PET tracer has enabled in vivo demonstration of cell proliferation (4). 18F-FLT is a pyrimidine analog that, after uptake into the cell, is phosphorylated by thymidine kinase 1 into 18F-FLT monophosphate, causing intracellular sequestration of radioactivity. Thymidine kinase 1 is a principal enzyme in the salvage pathway of DNA synthesis and exhibits increased activity during the S phase of the cell cycle. 18F-FLT uptake, therefore, reflects cellular proliferation. A strong correlation has been demonstrated between 18F-FLT uptake and proliferation rate as measured by the Ki-67 index (5–8).

The primary aim of this study was to use serial 18F-FLT PET/CT scans to evaluate tumor cell proliferation during radiotherapy of esophageal SCC. We also investigated the effects of radiotherapy on bone marrow proliferation and compared the efficacy of 18F-FLT PET with that of 18F-FDG PET in differentiating residual tumor from inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Between February and September 2009, 21 consecutive inoperable patients with SCC of the esophagus at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were accrued to this study. Patients were eligible if they had stage I–IV histologically proven SCC of the esophagus, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, and the ability to undergo serial PET/CT. Exclusion criteria included prior thoracic radiotherapy or complete macroscopic excision of the tumor. Patients were treated in accordance with our current clinical guidelines and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemotherapy and radiation, or radiotherapy alone. Three patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy were participants in Erbitux Combined with Chemo-Radiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (EXCEL), a clinical trial investigating concurrent administration of cetuximab, paclitaxel, and cisplatin with radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy delivered 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 wk, using 6- or 15-MV photons in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or conventional plans. Concomitant or sequential chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (75 mg/m2, day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2/24 h by continuous infusion on days 1 through 4). Patients in the EXCEL trial received cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on day 1 of week 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 2–8), paclitaxel (45 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 2–8), and cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 2–8).

All patients gave written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute.

Radiopharmaceuticals

18F-FLT was synthesized by a cyclotron (MiniTrace; GE Healthcare) and synthesizer (TracerLab FxFN; GE Healthcare). Raw materials and agents for the synthesis were purchased from the same supplier. 18F-FLT was synthesized according to the method of Machulla et al. (9). 18F-FLT was produced by fluorination with 18F-fluoride of the 4,40-dimethoxytrityl–protected anhydrothymidine, followed by a deprotection step. After purification by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, the product was made isotonic and passed through a 0.22-μm filter. Labeling yield, radiochemical purity, and specific radioactivity of the products were checked and recorded after each production. The products had to meet prespecified criteria (e.g., radiochemical yield > 10% and radiochemical purity > 95%) to qualify for use in imaging.

Imaging Protocol

The patients fasted for 6 h and rested for 15 min before administration of 300–400 MBq of radioactive tracer. After receiving the injection, the patients drank 500 mL of water for optimal hydration and to stimulate excretion of 18F-FLT. PET/CT scans were acquired 50–60 min after injection. Scanning was performed in partial-body mode from the seventh cervical vertebra to the abdomen, for 2 min per bed position. The axial field of view covered 14.5 cm, with an axial sampling thickness of 4.25 mm per slice. Images were reconstructed using an iterative technique and were interpreted on Xeleris workstations (GE Healthcare) by an experienced nuclear medicine radiologist. Maximum tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and proliferation target volume were measured by a clinical investigator and an experienced nuclear medicine specialist. Because our previous study on 18F-FLT PET/CT identified an SUVmax cutoff of 1.4 as providing the closest estimate of gross tumor volume for esophageal cancer (10), regions of interest were drawn around tumor volumes with an SUVmax greater than 1.4 to create the proliferation target volume.

Timing of Scans

Baseline 18F-FLT PET/CT scans were obtained within 3 d before commencement of treatment (tumor dose [TD], 0 Gy). Patients continued on the study even if 18F-FLT was not visible on the baseline scan to explore whether lesions initially undetectable by 18F-FLT might become visible during radiotherapy because of accelerated repopulation. Each patient was scheduled to have 2–4 scans during the treatment delivery period, with the TD at the time of imaging indicated in Table 1; on-treatment 18F-FLT PET/CT scans were obtained at a TD of 2, 6, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 Gy (i.e., after radiotherapy) to provide a range of TD points for assessment of cell proliferation. Scanning at TDs of 2 and 6 Gy was designed to capture information on initial DNA damage. Scanning at TDs of 10 and 20 Gy was intended to evaluate early response to treatment. Scanning at TDs of 30, 40, or 50 Gy was intended to explore ongoing tumor response and the possibility of accelerated repopulation recommencing later in the treatment course. The postradiotherapy scans were intended to compare 18F-FLT PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT with regard to their ability to differentiate residual tumor from inflammation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

RESULTS

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median time between injection of 18F-FLT and initiation of the emission scan was 56 min (range, 52–82 min). In all patients, intense physiologic 18F-FLT uptake was seen in bone marrow (reflecting active cellular proliferation), liver (because of glucuronidation of 18F-FLT), and urinary tract (demonstrating renal clearance). 18F-FLT uptake was seen in all primary lesions and lymph node metastases on pretreatment scans except in patient 5, who showed tumoral 18F-FLT uptake similar to background activity. This patient had received 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil before radiotherapy (Fig. 1). The mean SUVmax of the primary esophageal tumor was 9.7 (range, 1.1–15.2), and the mean proliferation target volume was 21.9 cm3 (range, 0–34.8 cm3). The mean SUVmax of lymph node metastases was 4.6 (range, 3.4–8.5), and the mean proliferation target volume was 11.2 cm3 (range, 3.2–21.6 cm3).

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

This patient had induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy. From left to right are shown CT, PET, fused PET/CT, and maximum-intensity-projection images. Arrows indicate esophageal tumor. (A) Before radiotherapy, SUVmax was 1.2 and proliferation target volume was 0. (B) After 30 Gy/15 fractions, SUVmax was 1.1 and proliferation target volume was 0. (C) After 50 Gy/25 fractions, SUVmax was 1.2 and proliferation target volume was 0.

On-Treatment 18F-FLT PET/CT: Tumor Repopulation

Nineteen of 21 patients received radiotherapy without interruption. In these patients, tumoral SUVmax (Fig. 2) and proliferation target volume (Fig. 3) diminished gradually with increasing TD. These parameters suggest an almost complete absence of detectable tumor proliferation by a TD of 30 Gy and a complete absence at a TD of 40 Gy and beyond. Supplemental Figure 1 illustrates the gradual reduction of 18F-FLT uptake in the tumor and bone marrow of patient 11—a finding that is characteristic of all 19 patients (supplemental materials are available online only at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

Tumoral SUVmax on 18F-FLT PET at different TDs.

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

Proliferation target volume (pTV) on 18F-FLT PET at different TDs.

Two patients had unplanned interruptions of their radiotherapy course, which had corresponding increases in 18F-FLT uptake suggestive of tumor repopulation. Patient 19 had a 2-d treatment disruption after only a single 2-Gy fraction, because of malfunction of the linear accelerator. After this disruption, tumoral SUVmax and proliferation target volume rose above baseline whereas 18F-FLT uptake in irradiated bone marrow decreased (Fig. 4). Patient 1 had a 5-d suspension in treatment after a TD of 46 Gy because of grade III bone marrow suppression according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (CTCAE 3.0). After radiotherapy on a Tuesday, he received human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from Wednesday to Friday, rested on Saturday and Sunday, and had the 18F-FLT PET/CT scan on Monday. In this patient, 18F-FLT tumoral uptake reduced gradually from TD 0 Gy to TD 30 and 40 Gy and then increased after the treatment interruption at TD 46 Gy, though uptake remained less than at baseline (Supplemental Fig. 2).

FIGURE 4. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4. 

Tumor repopulation after interruption of treatment. From left to right are shown axial CT, axial PET, sagittal PET, sagittal fused PET/CT, and maximum-intensity-projection images. Pink arrows indicate esophageal tumor. (A) Before radiation therapy, tumor SUVmax was 7.02 and proliferation target volume was 23.8 cm3. (B) At TD of 2 Gy/1 fraction, after treatment break, SUVmax was 8.22 and proliferation target volume was 27.9 cm3. Radiation field included only left half of vertebrae at these levels (blue arrows represent incident beam). 18F-FLT uptake in irradiated bone marrow decreased (white arrows).

On-Treatment 18F-FLT PET/CT: Lymph Node Metastasis Repopulation

In all patients, trends in 18F-FLT uptake in lymph node metastases reflected trends in uptake in the primary tumor, with SUVmax and proliferation target volume lowering gradually with radiotherapy except after breaks in treatment. SUVmax and proliferation target volume tended to decline less sharply in lymph nodes than in the primary tumor. In patient 1, lymph node uptake reduced gradually from TD 0 Gy to TD 30 and 40 Gy and then increased after treatment interruption at TD 46 Gy.

On-Treatment 18F-FLT PET/CT: Normal-Tissue Response

18F-FLT uptake declined markedly in irradiated bone marrow. These striking changes, corresponding to the paths of the radiation beams, were apparent even after the delivery of only 2 Gy (Fig. 4). By TD 10 Gy, all demonstrated complete absence of uptake in irradiated ribs, sternum, and spine, clearly outlining the boundaries of the radiation fields and suggesting absence of cell proliferation in irradiated marrow after a relatively low radiation dose. This observation held true for patients scanned at later TD points. Marrow uptake did not increase immediately after treatment interruptions, arguing against marrow repopulation. Figures 5B and 5C show that irradiated bone marrow can, however, eventually regain proliferative ability after completion of radiotherapy. In patients who received induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy (patients 3 and 5), preradiotherapy uptake of 18F-FLT was lower than in other patients.

FIGURE 5. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5. 

In patient 15, 18F-FLT PET is more effective than 18F-FDG PET in distinguishing residual tumor from inflammation after radiotherapy. From left to right are shown axial CT, axial PET, sagittal PET, sagittal fused PET/CT, and maximum-intensity-projection images. (A) Postradiotherapy 18F-FDG PET shows high uptake (arrows) in primary esophageal tumor. (B) Corresponding 18F-FLT PET shows complete absence of uptake in primary esophageal tumor and irradiated vertebrae (arrows). (C) In 18F-FLT PET scan 1 mo after completion of radiotherapy, primary esophageal tumor still shows no uptake but irradiated vertebrae show more uptake than just after completion of radiotherapy (arrows). (D) Postradiotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT axial slice has SUVmax of 9.5. (E) Corresponding delayed (after 30 min) 18F-FDG PET/CT axial slice has SUVmax of 7.7. (F) Photomicrograph of endoscopic biopsy specimen of esophageal tumor shows inflammatory infiltrates and interstitial expansion (×100).

18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET: Inflammation and Tumor

After completion of radiotherapy (patients 15 and 16), the primary tumor region demonstrated absence of 18F-FLT uptake but high 18F-FDG uptake. Delayed 18F-FDG PET images (obtained 30 min later) showed slightly lower uptake of 18F-FDG. These patients had grade II esophagitis according to CTCAE 3.0. Subsequent endoscopic biopsy confirmed the presence of inflammatory infiltrates and interstitial expansion without evidence of malignancy (Fig. 5). One month after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, follow-up imaging including CT and plain films with oral barium indicated that the primary tumors approached a complete response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

DISCUSSION

Serial 18F-FLT PET/CT scans elegantly demonstrated the gradual decline in tumor cell proliferation during radiotherapy of esophageal SCC. Tumor proliferation in this study decreased successively with increasing dose and was almost absent after delivery of about 40 Gy, that is, after 4 wk of uninterrupted radiotherapy.

Serial 18F-FLT PET/CT scans also demonstrated tumor repopulation after interruptions in radiotherapy. Similar to SCC of the head and neck, SCC of the esophagus is considered a rapidly proliferating tumor and is thought to exhibit the phenomenon of accelerated repopulation described by Withers and Taylor (11) in experiments on fractionated radiotherapy. Although the classic understanding of repopulation holds that it occurs preferentially after around 4 wk of radiotherapy, repopulation was observed in this study after treatment breaks at 46 Gy and as early as 2 Gy. Fowler (12) suggested that repopulation begins early. Experimental data from Schmidt-Ullrich et al. (13) support this hypothesis, showing that molecular processes of accelerated repopulation, mediated through radiation-induced receptor activation and cellular growth stimulation, occur after a single 2-Gy fraction. Everitt et al. (14) also observed a “flare” of 18F-FLT uptake in primary non–small cell lung cancer after only 2 Gy.

Accelerated repopulation is believed to contribute to radioresistance, implying that in esophageal SCC, interruptions in radiotherapy are counterproductive. Our results suggest that radiotherapy should be completed without interruption; treatment breaks and split-course radiotherapy should be avoided. When treatment breaks are necessary, adding radiation fractions to the end of treatment to escalate total dose or increasing the dose per fraction may be obligatory to counteract the effects of repopulation. Shortening duration of treatment a priori may preempt repopulation. Zhao et al. (15) demonstrated the effectiveness of late-course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the nonsurgical management of locally advanced esophageal SCC in a phase III prospective trial.

The theory of accelerated repopulation has been based on cellular and animal experiments, whereas our clinical study directly detected repopulation in humans. Future studies should investigate the clinical significance of 18F-FLT PET, which is noninvasive and easily repeatable, in detecting repopulation in esophageal SCC and other rapidly proliferating tumors, such as malignancies of the head and neck.

Serial 18F-FLT PET/CT scans in this study also depict the effects of radiotherapy on bone marrow proliferation. Marked early reduction of proliferation in irradiated marrow was observed after only 2 Gy and complete absence of proliferation after 10 Gy. Accelerated repopulation was not observed in marrow during treatment breaks. Posttreatment scans suggest, however, that bone marrow eventually regains its ability to proliferate after completion of radiotherapy. Preradiotherapy scans after induction chemotherapy reflect systemic suppression of hematopoiesis. These results insinuate a role for 18F-FLT PET in monitoring bone marrow suppression during or after radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

This study also suggests a role for 18F-FLT PET in differentiating inflammation from residual tumor, as currently used imaging modalities are nonspecific in this regard. Endoscopic ultrasound after radiotherapy is poor at distinguishing tumor from posttherapeutic fibrosis or inflammation. 18F-FDG PET relies on metabolic differences in glucose use, but glucose accumulates both in tumor and in inflammatory cells, and inflammatory cells are common in irradiated esophageal tissue (16–18). Uptake on 18F-FDG PET, therefore, could represent either residual tumor or esophagitis. This study suggests that 18F-FLT PET may discriminate tumor from esophagitis more effectively, which could have important clinical applications.

One potential application of 18F-FLT PET is early assessment of treatment response. 18F-FLT PET has been used to monitor response to chemotherapy, which may have implications on survival (19–22). Changes in 18F-FLT uptake early in chemotherapy may correlate with outcomes in patients with breast or brain tumors (19). One in vitro study demonstrated that 18F-FLT uptake in esophageal cancer cells decreased early after incubation with various cytotoxic drugs (23). If studies confirm that early changes in 18F-FLT uptake predict ultimate tumor response, early identification of nonresponders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation could direct alterations in therapy to potentially improve outcomes.

Our study suggests that 18F-FLT PET provides treatment response data incremental to CT alone. After 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy, patient 5 (Fig. 1) demonstrated tumoral SUVmax similar to background, though tumor appeared to remain on CT. Similarly, patients 11 (Supplemental Fig. 1) and 1 (Supplemental Fig. 2) exhibited reductions in tumoral SUVmax to background levels after radiotherapy, despite residual tumor on CT. CT identifies residual tumor with poor specificity. Additional investigations should confirm whether 18F-FLT PET depicts treatment response more accurately. A comprehensive study examining the relationship between early changes on 18F-FLT PET and outcomes such as treatment response, local failure rate, and survival is ongoing at our institution.

18F-FLT PET/CT could also be used to determine a biologic target volume for radiotherapy. “Dose painting” via intensity-modulated radiation therapy could potentially be used to escalate dose to regions of clonogenic proliferation.

Our study is limited by its small sample size. Additional research is needed to confirm the validity of these findings.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that 18F-FLT PET/CT can demonstrate the distinctive biologic response of esophageal SCC to radiotherapy, including its potential for accelerated repopulation. 18F-FLT PET/CT can also depict the effects of radiotherapy on bone marrow and may differentiate between residual tumor and inflammation. 18F-FLT PET/CT, as a noninvasive and reliable imaging technique, may eventually help oncologists assess treatment response, estimate clonogenic repopulation during radiotherapy, or evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy. Additional investigation with larger patient numbers is needed to validate these findings.

Acknowledgments

We thank our chief nurse, Ningsha Yu, for her great assistance and support of the research.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999;281:1623–1627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Minsky BD, Pajak T, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (RTOG 94-05) phase III trial of combined modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high dose (64.8Gy) vs. standard dose (50.4Gy) radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:45–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Kajanti M, Kaleta R, Kankaanranta L, Muhonen T, Holsti L. Effect of overall treatment time on local control in radical radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:1017–1023.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Shields AF, Grierson JR, Dohmen BM, et al. Imaging proliferation in vivo with F-18-FLT and positron emission tomography. Nat Med. 1998;4:1334–1336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Cobben DC, Elsinga PH, Suurmeijer AJ, et al. Detection and grading of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities with 18F-3-fluoro-3-deoxy-L-thymidine. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1685–1690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Ishikawa S, et al. Correlation of 18FLT and 18FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohisto-chemistry in non small lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1610–1616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    Yap CS, Czernin J, Fishbein MC, et al. Evaluation of thoracic tumours with 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chest. 2006;129:393–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M, et al. In vivo validation of 3′deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [18F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immuno-histochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumours. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3315–3323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Machulla HJ, Blochter A, Kuntzsch M, et al. Simplified labeling approach for synthesizing 3′-deoxy-3-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT). J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2000;243:843–846.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Han D, Yu J, Yu Y et al. Comparison of 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in delineating gross tumor volume by optimal threshold in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
  11. 11.↵
    Withers HR, Taylor JM. Critical volume model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25:151–152.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Fowler JF. Rapid repopulation in radiotherapy: a debate on mechanism—the phantom of tumor treatment: continually rapid proliferation unmasked. Radiother Oncol. 1991;22:156–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Contessa JN, Dent P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced accelerated repopulation. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1999;7:321–330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Everitt S, Hicks RJ, Ball D, et al. Imaging cellular proliferation during chemo-radiotherapy: a pilot study of serial 18F-FLT positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1098–1104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Zhao KL, Shi XH, Jiang GL, et al. Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a phase III randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1014–1020.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19:61–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1972–1980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Kubota R, Kubota K, Yamada S, Tada M, Ido T, Tamahashi N. Microautoradiographic study for the differentiation of intratumoral macrophages, granulation tissues and cancer cells by the dynamics of fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:104–112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Chen W, Cloughesy T, Kamdar N, et al. Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:945–952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.
    Pio BS, Park CK, Pietras R, et al. Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with positron emission tomography in predicting breast cancer response to therapy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2006;8:36–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    Kenny L, Coombes RC, Vigushin DM, Al-Nahhas A, Shousha S, Aboagye EO. Imaging early changes in proliferation at 1 week post chemotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer patients with 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1339–1347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Herrmann K, Wieder HA, Buck AK, et al. Early response assessment using 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3552–3558.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Dittmann H, Dohmen BM, Kehlbach R, et al. Early changes in [18F]FLT uptake after chemotherapy: an experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1462–1469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication October 28, 2009.
  • Accepted for publication January 5, 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue 4
April 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study
Jinbo Yue, Lusheng Chen, Alvin R. Cabrera, Xindong Sun, Shuqiang Zhao, Fu Zheng, Anqin Han, Jinsong Zheng, Xuezhong Teng, Li Ma, Yidong Ma, Dali Han, Xianguang Zhao, Dianbin Mu, Jinming Yu, Yuhui Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2010, 51 (4) 528-534; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072124

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study
Jinbo Yue, Lusheng Chen, Alvin R. Cabrera, Xindong Sun, Shuqiang Zhao, Fu Zheng, Anqin Han, Jinsong Zheng, Xuezhong Teng, Li Ma, Yidong Ma, Dali Han, Xianguang Zhao, Dianbin Mu, Jinming Yu, Yuhui Li
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2010, 51 (4) 528-534; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072124
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 18F-FLT PET/CT Adds Value to 18F-FDG PET/CT for Diagnosing Relapse After Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients with Lung Cancer: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial
  • Hybrid Imaging PET/CT with Application of 18F-Fluorothymidine in Patients with Head and Neck Carcinoma Undergoing Radiotherapy
  • Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer with Textural Features Derived from Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
  • Role of Positron Emission Tomography for the Monitoring of Response to Therapy in Breast Cancer
  • PET Imaging of Proliferation with Pyrimidines
  • 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is an Early Predictor of Outcome
  • In Vivo Imaging of Cell Proliferation Enables the Detection of the Extent of Experimental Rheumatoid Arthritis by 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine and Small-Animal PET
  • Usefulness of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET for Predicting Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire