|
|
|||||||||
Basic Science Investigations |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Research and Development, Mallinckrodt, Tyco Healthcare, Petten, The Netherlands
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
4 Department of Endocrinology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: thyroid cancer radioiodine recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone bone marrow dosimetry
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The availability of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) provides an alternative means to elevate the thyroid-stimulating hormone level without inducing hypothyroidism. In the United States and Europe, rhTSH is approved for use before thyroglobulin testing or diagnostic 131I scintigraphy in patients on L-T4 suppressive therapy. In addition, several reports have been published on the efficacy of rhTSH before administration of therapeutic activities of 131I (57).
As is the case with most radiopharmaceuticals, with radioiodine the bone marrow absorbed dose is one of the major factors limiting the size of the therapeutic activity that may be administered to a given patient. To calculate the bone marrow absorbed dose and, thus, the maximum tolerated activity for an individual, an understanding of the pharmacokinetics of large activities of 131I is necessary. Such pharmacokinetics are well characterized in patients whose LT-4 has been withdrawn and who have become hypothyroid (8,9). However, though it is known that the pharmacokinetics of 131I after rhTSH administration differ from those during hypothyroidism (1012), these pharmacokinetics remain largely nondelineated with respect to large activities of radioiodine. To our knowledge, blood dosimetry of therapeutic activities of 131I has been reported only to a limited degree in 2 single-case reports (13,14). We therefore conducted the present study to calculate the red marrow and whole-blood absorbed doses of large activities of 131I given after administration of rhTSH. In addition, we sought to evaluate the effects of rhTSH-aided radioiodine treatment on the bone marrow by monitoring for potential related hematologic toxicity and by comparing baseline and posttreatment platelet counts.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
64 y old.
|
Treatment Protocol
Patients were instructed to follow a low-iodine diet for the 5 d before and 2 d after 131I administration. An intramuscular injection of rhTSH (0.9 mg) (Thyrogen; Genzyme Corp.) was given on 2 consecutive days, followed by oral administration of 7.4 GBq of 131I (Tyco Healthcare) on the third day. Treatment was given on an inpatient basis; patients were discharged 3 d after oral administration of the 131I, after the final collection of blood and urine samples.
Bone Marrow Dosimetry
Immediately before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h after 131I administration, blood samples were drawn. In addition, urine was collected for the 72 h after radioiodine administration. The radioactivity of blood and urine samples and of a standard of known activity was measured in a well counter (Sample Changer type 5550; Packard Bioscience Co.). The blood data points were fitted to a biexponential timeactivity-concentration function. For the second exponential function, a half-life of 80 d was used for 131I in thyroactive tissue. Use of this model recirculation of 131I is accounted for (15). It was assumed that the activity concentration in the red bone marrow could be estimated by the activity concentration in blood, using the patient-specific method of Sgouros (16,17), as the Na131I does not bind to marrow or bone. The circulating blood activity produces a red marrow dose, DRM, of:
![]() | (Eq. 1) |
where A0 is the injected activity, [
]blood is the residence time of the blood concentration (in h/L), mRMblood is the red marrow mass according to the bone marrow model (1.120 kg (18)), and mTBpatient and mTBmodel are the total body masses of the patient and according to the dosimetry model (MIRD: 73.7 kg (19)), respectively. The red marrow extracellular fluid fraction, RMECFF (=0.19 (16)), divided by 1 HCT, the hematocrit (volume fraction of red blood cells), expresses the ratio of red marrow concentration to blood concentration, which usually lies between 0.2 and 0.4. The red marrow self-dose S-value, S(RM
RM), for 131I (1.55 x 105 mGy/MBq·s) was obtained from the RADAR (Radiation Dose Assessment Resource) Web site (20).
The whole-body activity equals the administered activity minus the excreted activity. These data points also were fitted to a biexponential timeactivity function. Because the contribution of the activity in the bone marrow to the whole-body activity is small, the activity in the remainder of the body (Arem) was assumed to equal the whole-body activity: Arem(t) = Ah{a1 exp(
1,remt) + a2 exp(
2,remt)}, where Ah is the initial whole-body activity and
i,rem the whole-body clearance constants with relative contributions ai (for i = 1,2).
The dose to the red marrow from the whole-body distribution was estimated by the patient-specific method of Shen et al. (17):
![]() | (Eq. 2) |
where
TB is the total-body residence time (=Ah/A0((a1/
1,rem +
p) + (a2/
2,rem +
p)), with
p the physical decay constant for 131I) and S(RM
TB) is the total-bodytored-marrow S-value. Depending on whether bone metastases were observed, the total-body MIRD-based S-value was corrected for the bone component according to the method of Stabin et al. (21), yielding S(RM
TB) = 2.78 x 107 mGy/MBq·s without and S(RM
TB) = 4.04 x 107 mGy/MBq·s with uptake in the bone surfaces. Because no patients in this study showed evidence of diffuse uptake in the skeleton, only the first S-value was used for the radiation doses to the patients.
Whole-Blood Dose Calculations
The blood dose was calculated according to the method of Benua et al. (8). On the basis of the previously calculated cumulative blood activity, it was assumed for our patient population that 37 MBq/d/L of 131I delivered to the blood a ß-dose of 10 cGy (assuming complete absorption) and a
-dose of 20.4 cGy (assuming an absorption factor of 0.4).
Safety Assessment
Physician observation and patient reporting of adverse events were used to assess the safety and impact on the bone marrow of rhTSH-aided radioiodine treatment. Additionally, standard serum platelet counts were taken before and 3 mo after rhTSH-aided radioiodine treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were calculated for bone marrow, whole blood, and urinary dosimetry; urine excretion; and platelet count. All mean values are expressed as mean ± SD. Mean platelet counts before and after rhTSH-aided treatments were compared by a paired-sample t test using SPSS (version 11; SPSS Inc.) for Windows (Microsoft). A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean residence time was 134 ± 60 h (median, 132 h; range, 17231 h).
Pretreatment with rhTSH was very well tolerated. No serious or marrow-related side effects were noted. After 131I administration, a transient period of mild nausea was observed for 6 of 17 treatments. The nausea was treated with antiemetic drugs (8 mg of ondansetron) and resolved within 5 d in all cases. In addition, sialoadenitis of the parotid gland developed in 1 patient but quickly resolved after treatment with acetylsalicylic acid.
Pre- and posttreatment platelet counts were available for 13 treatments (10 patients). The mean platelet count before therapy was 243 ± 62 x 109/L. Three months after therapy, the mean platelet count slightly decreased to 233 ± 87 x 109/L, but this change was not statistically significant (P = 0.418). Over the 3-mo follow-up, platelet counts decreased after 8 treatments but increased after 5 (Table 3).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Changes in renal function are common during hypothyroidism, and an increased serum creatine and decreased glomerular filtration rate have been described (22). Decreased renal clearance would be expected to result in increased 131I retention, and indeed, Park et al. (10) reported that radioiodine retention after diagnostic 131I imaging was 50% greater in patients after withdrawal of L-T4 than in patients receiving rhTSH.
Another possible explanation for the differences in 131I pharmacokinetics between rhTSH administration and thyroid hormone withdrawal was offered by Menzel et al. (11) They recently demonstrated that rhTSH reduced the whole-body effective half-life of 131I after treatment with large activities, compared with observations for a separate cohort from whom thyroid hormone was withdrawn. Hypothyroid patients may have greater physiologic retention of radioiodine in the gastrointestinal tract (and presumably, other sites as well), as suggested by anecdotal impressions of greater background-to-noise ratios in posttherapy scintigrams taken after thyroid hormone withdrawal (11).
Our findings after 17 treatments given to 14 patients with metastatic or locally recurrent DTC suggest that the bone marrow absorbed dose indeed is lower after rhTSH-aided treatment than historically has been observed after thyroid hormone withdrawalaided treatment. Although we calculated the red marrow absorbed dose using the MIRD schema, we also calculated the whole-blood radiation-absorbed dose by the approach of Benua et al. (8) to permit a comparison with historical data. We found a lower mean whole-blood dose per administered activity of 131I in our series than Benua et al. did in 59 patients with metastatic DTC receiving a total of 122 radioiodine treatments: 0.23 mGy/MBq versus 0.31 mGy/MBq (2.67 Gy; range, 0.457.40 Gy). Benua et al. observed serious complications such as nonfatal and fatal bone marrow depression, radiation pneumonitis, and vomiting persisting 30 d after 11% of treatments. Serious complications correlated with total blood radiation exceeding 2 Gy and with administration of >11 GBq of 131I per individual treatment. By contrast, our patients showed no severe radiation complications. Nausea and vomiting were mild and resolved within 5 d after treatment in all affected patients. In addition to the lower whole-blood absorbed dose, the superior safety profile seen in our series may be due to the activities that we administered. Although Benua et al. gave activities sometimes exceeding 11.1 GBq, we administered relatively conservative empiric activities of 7.4 GBq as standard treatment.
In therapy using radionuclides, a red marrow absorbed dose of 2 Gy is considered dose limiting (less than 5% damage in 5 y) (23). Our study showed that the bone marrow absorbed dose after rhTSH-aided administration of large activities of 131I fell below this threshold in all treatments. More important, in none of the patients was a clinically relevant bone marrow toxicity observed (only a slight, insignificant decrease in platelet counts after 3 mo). Blood tests were not performed within the 3-mo interval, and we therefore realize that a transient decline in platelet counts could have been missed. However, no intermediate-term (3 mo) hematologic side effects were observed.
In patients with a relatively high residence time (Table 2), a lower 131I clearance was observed; consequently, these patients had a higher red marrow dose delivered by whole-body activity. In our opinion, patients should be advised to drink at least 2 L of liquid per day to stimulate 131I clearance and thus decrease the whole-body exposure.
Our patient group had a mean red marrow absorbed dose of 0.16 mGy/MBq of administered 131I. This absorbed dose would allow a therapeutic activity of 131I higher than the current 7.4 GBq maximum that many centers allow for patients undergoing thyroid hormone withdrawal. This finding may have important therapeutic consequences, because a higher administered activity might well increase the tumor absorbed dose and thus therapeutic efficacy. Further studies are merited to test this hypothesis.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Bart de Keizer, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E02.222, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E-mail: b.dekeizer{at}azu.nl
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Frigo, A. Dardano, E. Danese, M. V. Davi, P. Moghetti, C. Colato, G. Francia, F. Bernardi, C. Traino, F. Monzani, et al. Chromosome Translocation Frequency after Radioiodine Thyroid Remnant Ablation: A Comparison between Recombinant Human Thyrotropin Stimulation and Prolonged Levothyroxine Withdrawal J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3472 - 3476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Serna, M. Alcaraz, J. L. Navarro, C. Acevedo, V. Vicente, and M. Canteras Biological dosimetry and Bayesian analysis of chromosomal damage in thyroid cancer patients Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 1, 2008; 129(4): 372 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H Duntas and B. Biondi Short-term hypothyroidism after Levothyroxine-withdrawal in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: clinical and quality of life consequences Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 156(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Travis and M. G. Stabin 131I Ablation Treatment in Young Females After the Chernobyl Accident J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1723 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hanscheid, M. Lassmann, M. Luster, S. R. Thomas, F. Pacini, C. Ceccarelli, P. W. Ladenson, R. L. Wahl, M. Schlumberger, M. Ricard, et al. Iodine Biokinetics and Dosimetry in Radioiodine Therapy of Thyroid Cancer: Procedures and Results of a Prospective International Controlled Study of Ablation After rhTSH or Hormone Withdrawal J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 648 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Jarzab, D Handkiewicz-Junak, and J Wloch Juvenile differentiated thyroid carcinoma and the role of radioiodine in its treatment: a qualitative review Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 773 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lassmann, H. Hanscheid, C. Reiners, S. R. Thomas, B. de Keizer, J. M.H. de Klerk, and M. W. Konijnenberg Blood and Bone Marrow Dosimetry in Radioiodine Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer After Stimulation with rhTSH J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 900 - 901. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sgouros Blood and Bone Marrow Dosimetry in Radioiodine Therapy of Thyroid Cancer J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 899 - 900. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |