JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 46 No. 5 899-900
© 2005 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Blood and Bone Marrow Dosimetry in Radioiodine Therapy of Thyroid Cancer

George Sgouros, PhD

Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland

TO THE EDITOR:

In a recent article by de Keizer et al. (1), the red marrow dosimetry model that I described in a previous issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (2) was used to estimate red marrow absorbed doses for patients receiving 131I-NaI. The formulation I described was based on the expected distribution of antibodies. It does not apply to the much smaller NaI molecule.

The key difference is in the distribution volume of the 2 radiopharmaceuticals. Radiolabeled antibody is assumed to initially distribute in the plasma and extracellular fluid space of the red marrow, spleen, and liver—organs whose extracellular fluid space rapidly equilibrates with plasma. The total volume of this initial distribution space is 2.5–4 L. Correspondingly, the initial plasma percentage of injected activity per liter (%IA/L) for antibodies is in the range of 25–40 (i.e., the reciprocal of the initial distribution volume). The initial %IA/L for 131I-NaI is in the range of 3–6, giving initial distribution volumes of 30–17 L. This means that the 131I is not confined to the extracellular fluid of the red marrow but is most likely evenly distributed throughout a much larger volume that includes the blood and the red marrow. The concentration of 131I in blood is, therefore, a better direct approximation of the concentration in red marrow. Use of a factor of between 0.2 and 0.4 to convert blood activity concentration to marrow activity concentration will underestimate the red marrow activity concentration (and, therefore, the absorbed dose) by between 5 and 2.5, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. de Keizer B, Hoekstra A, Konijnenberg MW, et al. Bone marrow dosimetry and safety of high 131I activities given after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to treat metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1549–1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sgouros G. Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:689–694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE