Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Impact of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET on Staging and Managing Patients for Radiation Therapy

Elena V. Dizendorf, Brigitta G. Baumert, Gustav K. von Schulthess, Urs M. Lütolf and Hans C. Steinert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2003, 44 (1) 24-29;
Elena V. Dizendorf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brigitta G. Baumert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gustav K. von Schulthess
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Urs M. Lütolf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans C. Steinert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Whole-body PET with 18F-FDG has proven to be a very effective imaging modality for staging of malignant tumors. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients for radiation therapy. Methods: The treatment records of 202 consecutive patients (98 male, 104 female; mean age, 56.9 y; age range, 8–91 y) with different malignant tumors were reviewed. Radiation therapy was intended for all patients. The diagnoses were head and neck tumors (n = 55), gynecologic tumors (n = 28), breast cancer (n = 28), lung cancer (n = 26), malignant lymphomas (n = 24), tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (n = 18), and others (n = 23). Whole-body PET was performed before radiation therapy. The alteration of PET on each patient’s staging and management decisions for radiation therapy were determined. Results: For 55 of 202 patients (27%), PET results changed the patients’ management in radiation therapy. In 18 cases (9%), PET resulted in a cancellation of radiation therapy because of the detection of previously unknown distant metastases (8 patients), additional lymph node metastases (9 patients), residual tumor (6 patients), or the exclusion of active disease (2 patients). In 6 patients, >1 incremental reason was found for cancellation. In 21 PET examinations (10%), PET results changed the intention of radiation treatment (curative or palliative). The radiation dose was changed in 25 cases (12%). A change of radiation volume was necessary in 12 patients (6%). Conclusion: The results of this study show that 18F-FDG PET has a major impact on the management of patients for radiation therapy, influencing both the stage and the management in 27% of patients.

  • 18F-FDG PET
  • radiation management
  • radiation therapy
  • tumor staging

Footnotes

  • Received Dec. 26, 2001; revision accepted May 16, 2002.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Hans C. Steinert, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

    E-mail: hans.steinert{at}dmr.usz.ch

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 44, Issue 1
January 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET on Staging and Managing Patients for Radiation Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET on Staging and Managing Patients for Radiation Therapy
Elena V. Dizendorf, Brigitta G. Baumert, Gustav K. von Schulthess, Urs M. Lütolf, Hans C. Steinert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2003, 44 (1) 24-29;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET on Staging and Managing Patients for Radiation Therapy
Elena V. Dizendorf, Brigitta G. Baumert, Gustav K. von Schulthess, Urs M. Lütolf, Hans C. Steinert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2003, 44 (1) 24-29;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Imaging of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: From Diagnosis to Evaluation of Therapeutic Response
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction and Detection of Local Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Lung Lesions
  • The Dilemma of Target Delineation with PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning for Malignant Tumors
  • Advanced imaging applied to radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: a clinical review.
  • Why Most PET of Lung and Head-and-Neck Cancer Will Be PET/CT
  • To Enhance or Not to Enhance? 18F-FDG and CT Contrast Agents in Dual-Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Improves the Management of Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • 18F-FDG PET in Candidates for Radiation Therapy: Is It Important and How Do We Validate Its Impact?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Prognostic Role of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET–Based Response in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire