Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Basic & Translational -> Basic Science (O)

[18F]-FMISO PET imaging of tumor hypoxia to predict and monitor response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Kirsten Reeves, Patrick Song, Benjamin Larimer and Anna Sorace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 407;
Kirsten Reeves
1Department of Radiology; O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Alabama At Birmingham Birmingham AL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Song
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Larimer
3Radiology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Sorace
2University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham AL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

407

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has greatly improved outcomes in patients with a variety of local and metastatic cancers, yet predicting early response to therapy has remained a challenge. In order to enhance efficacy, there is a profound need to better understand biological mechanisms of response and how immunotherapies alter the tumor microenvironment, including factors such as hypoxia and tumor vasculature. It has been demonstrated that molecular imaging can provide a noninvasive approach to accurately quantify hypoxia in vivo, and that these imaging metrics can be predictive of response to targeted therapies. Furthermore, hypoxia has been shown to have a negative effect on numerous anti-tumor immune cells, providing a rationale for quantifying this important component of the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we hypothesize that PET imaging of tumor hypoxia during treatment with immunotherapy could provide insight for predicting response.

Methods: MC38 murine colorectal cancer cells were subcutaneously injected into the upper right flank of C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated with either 200 ug anti-mouse PD-1, a combination of 200 ug anti-mouse PD-1 and 200 ug anti-mouse CTLA-4 (n=6), or saline (n=7) via intraperitoneal injection every 3 days, for a total of 3 treatments, beginning 10 days following implantation. Tumor hypoxia was noninvasively imaged by injecting 5.6 MBq of [18F]-FMISO and performing PET imaging 80 minutes post-injection. PET imaging occurred prior to beginning therapy as well as 2 and 5 days post-therapy initiation. Tumor volume changes were longitudinally monitored for 2 weeks to quantify changes in tumor volume in response to immunotherapy. Mice were designated as non-responders and responders based on interim tumor volume analysis and the ratio of tumor to muscle [18F]-FMISO mean SUV was compared between groups. Statistical analysis was evaluated through a non-parametric T-test.

Results: Prior to initiating therapy, tumors that would subsequently respond demonstrated significantly higher levels of hypoxia as measured by tumor to muscle SUV ratio (tumor:background ratio - TBR) of 1.80 ± 0.37 compared to non-responding tumors, which measured a TBR of 1.09 ± 0.49 (P = 0.01). This trend was reversed following therapy, as tumor hypoxia increased in non-responders to a TBR of 2.40 ± 0.37, whereas hypoxia remained unchanged in responders (TBR = 1.67 ± 0.27). At day 5, tumors in the responding group had significantly lower hypoxia (P = 0.002) than non-responders. Separation of tumors into normoxic (TBR < 2.0) and hypoxic (TBR > 2.0) on day 5 post-therapy was predictive of both reduced tumor growth and increased overall survival. Mice identified as normoxic by [18F]-FMISO PET imaging had significantly smaller tumor volumes 12 days following treatment compared to the hypoxic group (330 ± 271 mm3 versus 1660 ± 836 mm3, repectively; P = 0.006). Additionally the median survival of normoxic tumors was 20 days, whereas hypoxic tumors had a median survival of only 12 days (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Hypoxia PET imaging with [18F]-FMISO represents a valuable tool for measuring changes in the tumor microenvironment during immunotherapy and preliminary data shows potential for predicting eventual response to checkpoint blockade. Paradoxically, in the MC38 model, low hypoxia pre-treatment was correlated with resistance to therapy, whereas effective checkpoint blockade prevented the rapid onset of hypoxia during tumor progression. This imaging supports the hypothesis that the immune system plays an active role in promoting tumor vascularization, providing rationale for further investigation into the role of hypoxia PET imaging in guiding therapeutic decisions.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
[18F]-FMISO PET imaging of tumor hypoxia to predict and monitor response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
[18F]-FMISO PET imaging of tumor hypoxia to predict and monitor response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Kirsten Reeves, Patrick Song, Benjamin Larimer, Anna Sorace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 407;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
[18F]-FMISO PET imaging of tumor hypoxia to predict and monitor response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Kirsten Reeves, Patrick Song, Benjamin Larimer, Anna Sorace
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 407;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Basic & Translational -> Basic Science (O)

  • Effect of Using Multiple Imaging Modalities on GTV Delineation of Sarcomas and Chordomas: a Reproducibility Study
  • PET/CT Radiomics predict Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis (PLC) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • Clinical validation of data-driven PET respiratory gating: impact on image quality and lesion conspicuity
Show more Oncology: Basic & Translational -> Basic Science (O)

Basic Oncology & Translational IV

  • Novel 68Ga-labeled peptide probe for PET/CT imaging of the cholecystokinin-2 receptor expression
  • 90Y-NM600 Immunomodulates the Tumor Microenvironment of a Syngeneic Murine Model of Head and Neck Cancer to Improve Response to Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition
Show more Basic Oncology & Translational IV

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire