Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

Preclinical investigation of anti-CEA antibody fragments as tumor imaging probes: Comparison of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics

Erwan Jouannot, Sébastien d'Heilly and Chantal Carrez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1334;
Erwan Jouannot
1Sanofi Oncology, Sanofi, Vitry sur Seine, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sébastien d'Heilly
1Sanofi Oncology, Sanofi, Vitry sur Seine, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chantal Carrez
1Sanofi Oncology, Sanofi, Vitry sur Seine, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1334

Objectives ImmunoPET using biological constructs as probes for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) represents an exciting imaging option to non-invasively demonstrate tumor targeting and quantify selective tumor uptake of biologics. In the present study a series of antibody fragments were investigated for their potential as tumor imaging probes. F(ab) and F(ab’)2 formats were derived from the anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) humanized monoclonal antibody hMN14 (labetuzumab), radiolabeled with Zirconium-89 (89Zr), and assessed in a mouse xenograft tumor model for tumor targeting, tissue biodistribution and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in comparison with the full mAb.

Methods ImmunoPET imaging was conducted on mice implanted with a patient-derived CEA-positive colorectal tumor model. The mice were imaged longitudinally at specific time points (from 1h to 7 days) following probe injection by the intravenous route. The PK profile of the radiolabeled compounds was assessed at regular time points (from 10 minutes to 7 days) post probe administration. The accumulation of the radioactive probes in tumor and normal organs was monitored by quantification of the PET signal on whole-body scans: the regions of interest were automatically extracted from the scans after registration on an anatomic atlas.

Results The extent of the tumoral tissue was clearly delineated on immunoPET scans for 89Zr-F(ab’)2 and 89Zr-mAb, with a high specific tracer uptake in tumor compared to normal tissue. The tumor targeting for the F(ab’)2 was approximately one-third of the parental anti-CEA mAb (43% ID/g). The 89Zr-F(ab) tracer uptake in tumor was distinctly lower, comparable to muscle tissue with a strong and rapid uptake in the kidney (40% ID/g at 24 hours) explaining the short biological half-live No specific uptake in the tumor was visualized with 89Zr-F(ab).

Conclusions 89Zr labelled anti-CEA F(ab’)2 and mAb show a potential for non-invasive monitoring of tissue/tumor biodistribution. The mAb exhibited a higher specific tumor uptake but a lower clearance than the F(ab’)2.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical investigation of anti-CEA antibody fragments as tumor imaging probes: Comparison of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Preclinical investigation of anti-CEA antibody fragments as tumor imaging probes: Comparison of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics
Erwan Jouannot, Sébastien d'Heilly, Chantal Carrez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1334;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preclinical investigation of anti-CEA antibody fragments as tumor imaging probes: Comparison of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics
Erwan Jouannot, Sébastien d'Heilly, Chantal Carrez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1334;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

  • ROC analysis for xSPECT Bone
  • Physiological distribution of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE: an atlas of standardized uptake values
  • The public sites and frequency of detection of radioactivity in patients treated with 131I and the security management of those patients: the final report of a national survey.
Show more Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

MTA I: Basic Science (Oncology) Posters

  • Early assessment of response to therapy: PET imaging of apoptosis
  • 99mTc-HYNIC-trastuzumab based SPECT imaging for diagnosing advanced gastric cancer
  • Characterization of a murine model of meningeal metastases from breast cancer
Show more MTA I: Basic Science (Oncology) Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire