Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Possible errors with MR-based attenuation correction for brain imaging in PET/MR scanners

Elena Rota Kops and Hans Herzog
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 372;
Elena Rota Kops
1INM4, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Juelich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Herzog
1INM4, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Juelich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

372

Objectives Template-based methods for attenuation correction (TAC) of brain studies in PET/MR scanners are easy to handle and deliver reliable attenuation maps (AM) in short time. Since a template is not expected to match measured attenuation data exactly, the source of potential errors were analysed in this study using TAC recently introduced by our group [1]: i) choice of template reference head (size, form, gender); ii) skull anomalies of the specific patient; iii) template smoothness influence on the reconstructed images.

Methods Eight normal subjects (4 f, 4 m) underwent a 2-bed-position transmission scan in the Siemens ECAT HR+ PET covering the neck region. i) 8 templates were created with each one of the 8 heads as reference. Eight patients (5 f, 3 m; 4 with, 4 w/o brain lesions) were measured in the Siemens BrainPET/MR scanner. AM with the 8 templates were generated and used for reconstruction. A two-sample t-test was performed between all possible map pairs within each patient group and VOI-atlas was used to analyse the reconstructed images. ii) PET data of two tumor patients with a skull anomaly were reconstructed with one template as described in i) and with the same, but adapted one with simulated skull lesion. iii) For one normal subject CT data were available. After converting the CT into a mu-map, 3D Gaussian kernels (3, 6, 10 mm) were applied. The PET data were reconstructed with TAC and the 3 CT-AC.

Results i) The 8 AM did not differ significant (p<0.001). The VOI-atlas analysis yielded an absolute mean variation of 2.0% among all possible image pairs, with single exceptions of 4%. ii) Only the area extremely close to the skull lesion showed a maximum error of 3%. iii) The mean difference between the VOIs reconstructed with CT-AC 3mm and 10mm was 0.21±0.46%, while the mean deviation between TAC and CT-AC 3mm was -2.10±1.89% with a maximum of -4.86%.

Conclusions The present error analysis confirms that our attenuation template method provides a reliable attenuation correction of brain PET data measured in PET/MR scanners. [1] Rota Kops E et al. IEEE NSS/MIC Conf Rec, pp 4327, 200

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Possible errors with MR-based attenuation correction for brain imaging in PET/MR scanners
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Possible errors with MR-based attenuation correction for brain imaging in PET/MR scanners
Elena Rota Kops, Hans Herzog
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 372;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Possible errors with MR-based attenuation correction for brain imaging in PET/MR scanners
Elena Rota Kops, Hans Herzog
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 372;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Image Generation: PET/MRI

  • A method for estimating the attenuation correction for the MR hardware of an MR/PET scanner
  • Three MRI-based attenuation correction methods for PET
Show more Image Generation: PET/MRI

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire