Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist Student: PET

The impact of PET/CT on breast cancer diagnosis and management care

Megan McGraw, Ashley Meschke, Elizabeth Tobias and Peter Horbenko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2122;
Megan McGraw
1Nuclear Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Meschke
1Nuclear Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Tobias
1Nuclear Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Horbenko
1Nuclear Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2122

Objectives To determine the effectiveness of PET/CT scanning in the diagnosis and management care of patients with breast cancer at NorthShore University HealthSystem.

Methods All breast cancer patients were selected from NorthShore University HealthSystem that had two or more PET/CT scans between September 2008 and August 2009. The data was further expanded to include all of the selected patients PET/CT studies. Using the electronic medical records system (Epic), the patient’s plan of care was analyzed according to diagnosis and PET/CT findings. Pre-PET/CT management care was classified into five categories; observation, additional imaging, biopsy, surgery, and treatment. Post-PET/CT management care followed the same criteria. All patients whose plan of care was changed due to the PET/CT were further evaluated.

Results The average number of PET/CT scans per patient was five (168 scans/34 patients). Out of a total of one hundred sixty-eight PET/CT scans, seventy-eight (46.4%) effected change for management care. A further evaluation of the PET/CT diagnosis was done by making a comparison of the patient’s individual scans. Seventy-eight (46.4%) worsened, thirty-three (19.6%) improved, and fifty-seven (33.9%) showed no change. Overall, PET/CT effected a change for thirty-one out of thirty-four (91.2%) patients post-PET/CT management care during the course of their treatment for breast cancer.

Conclusions The data suggests that PET/CT scans are necessary in the diagnosis and management care for breast cancer. Initial and repeat PET/CT scans are beneficial in the continuing plan of care for breast cancer patients

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of PET/CT on breast cancer diagnosis and management care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The impact of PET/CT on breast cancer diagnosis and management care
Megan McGraw, Ashley Meschke, Elizabeth Tobias, Peter Horbenko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2122;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The impact of PET/CT on breast cancer diagnosis and management care
Megan McGraw, Ashley Meschke, Elizabeth Tobias, Peter Horbenko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 2122;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist Student: PET

  • Comparison of FDG uptake and TNM staging in non-small cell lung cancer
  • Liver SUV in whole body 18F FDG-PET/CT: Stability and correlation with age and gender
  • Prevalence and patterns of metal artifacts in FDG PET/CT
Show more Technologist Student: PET

Technologist Student Papers II: PET & Cardiology

  • Comparison of FDG uptake and TNM staging in non-small cell lung cancer
  • Liver SUV in whole body 18F FDG-PET/CT: Stability and correlation with age and gender
  • Prevalence and patterns of metal artifacts in FDG PET/CT
Show more Technologist Student Papers II: PET & Cardiology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire