Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Quantification of the change in SUV due to the presence of defective detector blocks in clinical FDG PET imaging

Esmat Elhami, William Leslie, Sandor Demeter and Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1507;
Esmat Elhami
1University of Manitoba, Dept. of Radiology, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Leslie
1University of Manitoba, Dept. of Radiology, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandor Demeter
1University of Manitoba, Dept. of Radiology, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Goertzen
1University of Manitoba, Dept. of Radiology, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1507

Objectives Clinical PET systems based on block detector designs suffer occasional block detector failures, which can result in patient scan cancellations. In this study we examine the effects of defective detectors on measurements of SUVmax through imaging of a torso phantom.

Methods A Data Spectrum anthropomorphic torso phantom was imaged in a normally functioning Siemens Biograph 16 HiRez PET/CT scanner using a whole-body imaging protocol. The torso volume had an activity concentration defined as a SUV of 1.0. Six spherical and shell lesions with different activity concentrations were placed in the phantom. 11 one-block and 3 two-block defect cases were created by zeroing lines of response in the sinograms. The images were reconstructed using the standard clinical OSEM protocol. SUVmax was measured for each lesion and defect case on a Siemens Leonardo Workstation, with the SUVmax for the normal case (i.e. no defect present) serving as the true value for comparison.

Results Our preliminary results show that the average decrease in SUVmax over all lesions was 2% for one-block and 6% for the two-block defect cases. The largest observed change in SUVmax was 6% for a one-block defect and 8% for a two-block defect.

Conclusions In the presence of one or two defective block detectors, the observed change in SUVmax was in no case large enough to affect the clinical diagnosis of a lesion. Thus for these cases we recommend proceeding with routine patient scanning, with the caveat of making the reading physicians aware of the defect being present.

Research Support Winnipeg Health Sciences Foundation

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantification of the change in SUV due to the presence of defective detector blocks in clinical FDG PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantification of the change in SUV due to the presence of defective detector blocks in clinical FDG PET imaging
Esmat Elhami, William Leslie, Sandor Demeter, Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1507;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantification of the change in SUV due to the presence of defective detector blocks in clinical FDG PET imaging
Esmat Elhami, William Leslie, Sandor Demeter, Andrew Goertzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1507;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Evaluation of collimator blurring, attenuation, and scatter corrections for brain SPECT
  • Improved thallium-201 image contrast with a novel CZT cardiac SPECT system
  • New utility for registration of the CT and PET data in PET/CT
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • Evaluation of collimator blurring, attenuation, and scatter corrections for brain SPECT
  • Improved thallium-201 image contrast with a novel CZT cardiac SPECT system
  • New utility for registration of the CT and PET data in PET/CT
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire