Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherLetter to the Editor

Safety of 18F-DOPA Injection for PET of Carcinoid Tumor

Valérie Nataf, Macha Balard, Virginie de Beco, Khaldoun Kerrou, Fabrice Gutman, Dany Grahek, Françoise Montravers and Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2006, 47 (10) 1732;
Valérie Nataf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Macha Balard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginie de Beco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khaldoun Kerrou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrice Gutman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dany Grahek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise Montravers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Noël Talbot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - March 01, 2007

TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the case report of Koopmans et al. (1) concerning the occurrence of a carcinoid crisis after injection of 6-fluoro-(18F)-dihydroxyphenylanine (18F-DOPA) in a patient referred for 18F-DOPA PET of a metastatic carcinoid. We have been using 18F-DOPA for 4 y and have performed 170 18F-DOPA PET examinations for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors, the majority being carcinoid tumors. No similar cases were observed in our PET center. A single, minor adverse effect was reported by a few patients: a light and transient burning sensation at the injection site, probably due to the acidity of the radiopharmaceutical (pH 4.5–5, controlled before each administration).

Apart from a special sensitivity of this precise patient of Koopmans et al. (1) to 18F-DOPA, what factors might explain the lack of any detectable agonist effect or of any induction of a carcinoid crisis in our patients, in particular those referred because of a carcinoid tumor?

One hour before 18F-DOPA injection, the reported patient received 150 mg of carbidopa orally to block the aromatic amino acid decarboxylase enzyme. We have not used oral premedication with the decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa. Published studies suggest that its use before PET is far less common for neuroendocrine tumors than for brain imaging. It is nevertheless unlikely that carbidopa may have favored a carcinoid crisis, because it blocks the metabolism of 18F-DOPA into active amines.

In the reported patient, 8 mL of 18F-DOPA solution were administered intravenously in a few seconds. We never use direct intravenous administration of PET radiopharmaceuticals but always inject in an infusion tube connected to saline to minimize the risk of paravenous deposition, which would lead to a large local radiation dose. Furthermore, we inject the 18F-DOPA, in a similar volume of around 8 mL, slowly over 1 min to diminish the burning sensation at the injection site experienced by some patients.

One important parameter to consider is the difference in specific activity between the 18F-DOPA preparations. In the case report, its value was 6 GBq/mmol, whereas for IASOdopa (Iason), the preparation that we use, its value must be at least 30 GBq/mmol at calibration—that is, 5-fold greater. F2-18F gas used for the electrophilic reaction can be obtained either by bombardment of neon with deuterons or by bombardment of 18O-gas with protons. The producer of IASOdopa uses the 18O-gas bombardment method, which ensures much more efficient yields and results in a higher specific activity for 18F-DOPA. However, we inject 5 MBq/kg of body weight—that is, 350 MBq of 18F-DOPA for a 70-kg adult patient—on average 4 h after the calibration time, resulting in a mass of DOPA as carrier that is of the same order of magnitude as that injected in the reported patient.

In conclusion, we testify that 18F-DOPA PET with a slow injection of the radiopharmaceutical through an infusion catheter was safe in 170 cases of endocrine tumors. The presence of DOPA as a carrier in the injection should be kept in mind, and it seems important to use a preparation with a high specific activity, particularly when injections are to be given to patients several hours after preparation. However, the amount of carrier was not greater in the patient reported by Koopmans et al. (1) than in our patients.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Koopmans KP, Brouwers AH, De Hooge MN, et al. Carcinoid crisis after injection of 6-18F-fluorodihydroxyphenyalanine in a patient with metastatic carcinoid. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1240–1243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 10
October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of 18F-DOPA Injection for PET of Carcinoid Tumor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Safety of 18F-DOPA Injection for PET of Carcinoid Tumor
Valérie Nataf, Macha Balard, Virginie de Beco, Khaldoun Kerrou, Fabrice Gutman, Dany Grahek, Françoise Montravers, Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2006, 47 (10) 1732;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety of 18F-DOPA Injection for PET of Carcinoid Tumor
Valérie Nataf, Macha Balard, Virginie de Beco, Khaldoun Kerrou, Fabrice Gutman, Dany Grahek, Françoise Montravers, Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2006, 47 (10) 1732;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply to “The Value of Functional PET in Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics”
  • Reply to “The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study”
  • Maintaining the Evidence for In Vivo Brain Estrogen Receptor Density by Neuroendocrine Aging and Relationships with Cognition and Symptomatology
Show more Letter to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire