Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

Natural History of Myocardial αvβ3 Integrin Expression After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation with Changes in Myocardial Blood Flow

Matthieu Dietz, Christel H. Kamani, Colin Bousige, Vincent Dunet, Judith Delage, Vladimir Rubimbura, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Giorgio Treglia, Niklaus Schaefer, Wail Nammas, Antti Saraste, Juhani Knuuti, Nathan Mewton and John O. Prior
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2024, 65 (7) 1107-1112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267514
Matthieu Dietz
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
2Institut de Cardiologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory INSERM 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France;
3Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christel H. Kamani
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
4Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Bousige
5Laboratoire des Multimatériaux et Interfaces, UMR CNRS 5615, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Dunet
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Delage
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
7Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Rubimbura
4Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
8Department of Cardiology, Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte, Morges, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Nicod Lalonde
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgio Treglia
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
9Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland;
10Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niklaus Schaefer
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wail Nammas
11Heart Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; and
12Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antti Saraste
11Heart Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; and
12Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juhani Knuuti
12Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Mewton
2Institut de Cardiologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory INSERM 1060, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John O. Prior
1Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;
6University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Angiogenesis is an essential part of the cardiac repair process after myocardial infarction, but its spatiotemporal dynamics remain to be fully deciphered.68Ga-NODAGA-Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) is a PET tracer targeting αvβ3 integrin expression, which is a marker of angiogenesis. Methods: In this prospective single-center trial, we aimed to monitor angiogenesis through myocardial integrin αvβ3 expression in 20 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition, the correlations between the expression levels of myocardial αvβ3 integrin and the subsequent changes in 82Rb PET/CT parameters, including rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and wall motion abnormalities, were assessed. The patients underwent 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and rest and stress 82Rb-PET/CT at 1 wk, 1 mo, and 3 mo after STEMI. To assess 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake, the summed rest 82Rb and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD images were coregistered, and segmental SUVs were calculated (RGD SUV). Results: At 1 wk after STEMI, 19 participants (95%) presented increased 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake in the infarcted myocardium. Seventeen participants completed the full imaging series. The values of the RGD SUV in the infarcted myocardium were stable 1 mo after STEMI (1 wk vs. 1 mo, 1.47 g/mL [interquartile range (IQR), 1.37–1.64 g/mL] vs. 1.47 g/mL [IQR, 1.30–1.66 g/mL]; P = 0.9), followed by a significant partial decrease at 3 mo (1.32 g/mL [IQR, 1.12–1.71 g/mL]; P = 0.011 vs. 1 wk and 0.018 vs. 1 mo). In segment-based analysis, positive correlations were found between RGD SUV at 1 wk and the subsequent changes in stress MBF (Spearman ρ: r = 0.17, P = 0.0033) and MFR (Spearman ρ: r = 0.31, P < 0.0001) at 1 mo. A negative correlation was found between RGD SUV at 1 wk and the subsequent changes in wall motion abnormalities at 3 mo (Spearman ρ: r = –0.12, P = 0.035). Conclusion: The present study found that αvβ3 integrin expression is significantly increased in the infarcted myocardium 1 wk after STEMI. This expression remains stable after 1 mo and partially decreases after 3 mo. Initial αvβ3 integrin expression at 1 wk is significantly weakly correlated with subsequent improvements in stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis.

  • integrin αvβ3
  • PET
  • myocardial infarction
  • angiogenesis
  • RGD

The initiation of cardiac repair after a myocardial infarction (MI) requires a complex series of processes. In the first few days after reperfusion, an inflammatory phase with intense inflammation and immune cell infiltration enables the infarct to be cleared of damaged cells. This phase is followed by a reparative and proliferative phase over the next several days, with a believed peak around day 7; it includes the resolution of inflammation, cardiac fibroblast proliferation, scar formation, and angiogenesis, which are essential parts of the repair process (1,2). However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of angiogenesis after an MI remain to be fully deciphered (2). To prevent heart failure after MI, an improved understanding of myocardial angiogenesis is essential for the future development of effective and targeted treatments.

The transmembrane glycoprotein αvβ3 integrin is involved in cell interaction with the extracellular matrix, migration, and proliferation. Integrin αvβ3 is expressed on activated endothelial cells, where it plays a critical role in the angiogenic process within the myocardium after injury (3–6). Expression of integrin αvβ3 has also been reported in other various cell types, such as fibroblasts and activated macrophages (7–10). This diversity in expression may introduce some confounding effects. However, αvβ3 imaging holds promise for assessment of cardiac wound healing and repair after MI (11,12). In 2015, in a publication summarizing advanced techniques to evaluate angiogenesis, the American Heart Association cited the use of radiotracers to assess integrin expression (13). 68Ga-NODAGA-Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) is a PET tracer having a high binding affinity for αvβ3 and favorable biokinetics (14,15). A widely used PET perfusion tracer in clinical practice is 82Rb, allowing for accurate measurement of rest and stress myocardial perfusion in absolute units, with a test–retest methodologic precision of around 20% (16).

We hypothesized that myocardial 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake is increased during the peak of the proliferative phase after acute ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and is reduced during later stages of infarct healing. The objective of the present study was to assess the expression levels of myocardial αvβ3 integrin at 1 wk after STEMI and their potential evolution at 1 and 3 mo. In addition, the correlations between the expression levels of myocardial αvβ3 integrin and the subsequent changes in 82Rb-PET/CT parameters, including rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and wall motion abnormalities, were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

This was a prospective single-center trial conducted in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (Lausanne, Switzerland). All participants were included within the first 12 h after symptom onset and underwent reperfusion (supplemental materials; available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the canton of Vaud (protocol CER-VD 429/14) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03809689). All patients gave written informed consent.

PET/CT Imaging

All participants underwent 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and rest and stress 82Rb-PET/CT at 1 wk (4–10 d) after STEMI. Then, the participants underwent repeated 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and rest and stress 82Rb-PET/CT at 1 and 3 mo after STEMI (Fig. 1). The 82Rb-PET/CT imaging was performed as previously described (17), with the complete imaging acquisition protocol reported in the supplemental materials. Briefly, a 5 MBq/kg dose of 82Rb (Ruby-Fill generator and 82Rb elution system; Jubilant DraxImage) was administered through an automated infusion system for 15–25 s, and 3-dimensional dynamic PET images were acquired for 6.1 min (12 × 8, 5 × 12, 1 × 30, 1 × 60, and 1 × 120 s). Stress acquisitions were then performed using the same protocol. Then, a median of 159 MBq of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD was injected as an intravenous bolus and was followed by a PET acquisition of 10 min after a median of 60 min. Images were reconstructed using ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithms.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Experimental timeline.

PET Image Analysis

Image analyses were performed using PMOD (version 4.3; PMOD Technologies).

82Rb-PET/CT Analysis

Perfusion was assessed quantitatively, measuring MBF in mL/min/g at rest and stress using a 1-tissue-compartment model with a flow-dependent extraction correction (supplemental materials). Perfusion was also assessed visually and semiquantitatively. A segmental wall motion analysis was performed on rest-gated 82Rb-PET images using a 5-point scoring scale, and the summed rest score for wall motion was derived. Rest left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, as well as ejection fraction, were computed.

68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT Analysis

68Ga-NODAGA-RGD images were assessed visually and quantitatively. To assess the RGD uptake, the summed rest 82Rb images and the 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD images were coregistered (Supplemental Fig. 1). Polar maps of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake expressed as SUVs (SUV; measured activity concentration [Bq/mL] × body weight [g]/injected dose at the time of image decay correction [Bq]) were generated, and mean segmental SUVs were calculated (RGD SUV). The characterization of the infarcted myocardium and the remote myocardium is detailed in the supplemental materials.

Statistical Analysis

No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.2, R Project). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) or as mean ± SEM. The comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Categoric data were expressed as count and percentage. The Friedman test was used to compare continuous variables across multiple time points. When statistical significance was reached, post hoc Dunn multiple-comparison tests were used for pairwise comparisons. The correlations between RGD SUV and the subsequent changes in rest MBF, stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis were assessed on all segments using the Spearman correlation analysis. The tests were selected because of the nonnormal distribution of the data, as determined by the Shapiro–Wilk test.

RESULTS

Participants

In total, 20 participants were included in the study (20% female; age, 63 y [IQR, 58–69 y]; Supplemental Table 1). Among the participants, 19 (95%) had no previous history of cardiovascular disease before the onset of acute STEMI. Only one participant had a history of prior coronary revascularization, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

PCI was performed on all the participants 3.8 h (IQR, 2.3–6.3 h) after symptoms onset. Invasive angiography found single-vessel obstructive disease in 7 (35%) participants and multivessel obstructive coronary artery disease in 13 (65%). All participants underwent stenting using drug-eluting stents of the culprit lesion. One participant (5%) had unsuccessful reperfusion with a post-PCI thrombolysis in MI flow grade 1.

The 20 participants underwent rest and stress 82Rb-PET/CT and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT imaging 9 d (IQR, 7–10 d) after STEMI. A total of 18 participants underwent a second 82Rb-PET/CT and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT study 32 d (IQR, 30–37 d) after STEMI, and 17 participants underwent a third 82Rb-PET/CT and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT study 89 d (IQR, 83–96 d) after STEMI and completed the full imaging series. In segment-based analysis, rest and stress MBF, MFR, wall motion analysis, and RGD SUV were assessed for the full imaging series in 289 segments (17 × 17 participants).

Imaging Findings 1 Week After STEMI

Complete reperfusion, as indicated by absence of a significant perfusion defect (summed stress score < 4), was observed in 6 participants (33%). The rest MBF was 0.50 mL/min/g (IQR, 0.42–0.58 mL/min/g) across the entire myocardium, 0.58 mL/min/g (IQR, 0.48–0.60 mL/min/g) in the remote myocardium, and 0.38 mL/min/g (IQR, 0.34–0.52 mL/min/g) in the infarcted myocardium. Rest left ventricular ejection fraction was less than 50% in 12 participants (60%). A total of 14 participants (70%) demonstrated segmental wall motion abnormalities (summed rest score for wall motion > 0).

A total of 19 participants (95%) presented RGD-positive segments (n = 66); those segments were always included in myocardial tissue perfused by the culprit coronary artery. Among those 66 positive segments, 55 were obtained from the 17 participants who completed the full imaging series and were selected to represent the infarcted myocardium. Among the 6 participants who experienced a complete reperfusion and had no significant 82Rb PET perfusion defect (summed stress score < 4), RGD-positive segments were detected in 5 (83%).

Temporal Changes

The values of the RGD SUV in the infarcted myocardium were stable 1 mo after STEMI (P = 0.9 for post hoc comparison of 1 wk vs. 1 mo; Table 1), followed by a significant decrease at 3 mo (P = 0.011 for post hoc comparison with 1 wk, P = 0.018 for post hoc comparison with 1 mo; Table 1; Figs. 2 and 3). There was no significant change in RGD SUV in the remote myocardium throughout the follow-up (Friedman test P = 0.59). At all time points, the RGD SUVs of the infarcted myocardium and the remote myocardium were significantly different (all P < 0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Temporal Changes in Infarcted and Remote Myocardium

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

αvβ3 integrin expression in infarcted myocardium remained stable 1 mo after STEMI, followed by significant partial decrease at 3 mo. **P ≤ 0.01.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Participant example with decrease in αvβ3 integrin expression levels (arrows) in infarcted myocardium (asterisks) after 1 wk to follow-up at 3 mo. Shown are rest 82Rb, 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET, and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT images at 1 wk (first row), 1 mo (second row), and 3 mo (third row) after STEMI.

In participants with significant 82Rb-PET/CT perfusion defects, areas of positive RGD uptake matched the extent of perfusion defects, with some slight extensions in border zones. In the 2 participants with the most severe infarcts (rest MBF in the infarcted myocardium at 1 wk of 0.30 mL/min/g and 0.26 mL/min/g), the RGD SUVs of the infarcted myocardium increased by at least 20% at 1 mo, without a change in clinical status or occurrence of events (Fig. 4; Supplemental Fig. 2). In these 2 participants, the RGD uptake started in the border zone and extended into the necrotic infarct core (Fig. 4). The RGD uptake was relatively homogeneous in all the other participants with smaller infarcts.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Participant example with increase in αvβ3 integrin expression levels (arrows) throughout follow-up within infarcted myocardium (asterisks). Shown are rest 82Rb, 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET, and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT images at 1 wk (first row), 1 mo (second row), and 3 mo (third row) after STEMI. 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake started in border zone at 1 mo and subsequently extended into necrotic infarct core at both 1 and 3 mo.

In participant-based analysis, global 82Rb-PET/CT parameters and hemodynamics during 82Rb-PET/CT imaging did not significantly change between initial and follow-up imaging (Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). Left ventricular ejection fraction improved by at least 5% in 8 (12%) of the 17 participants who completed the full imaging series. In segment-based analysis, rest MBF improved by at least 20% in 163 segments (56%), stress MBF improved by at least 20% in 164 segments (57%), MFR improved by at least 20% in 151 segments (52%), and wall motion abnormalities improved (difference score for wall motion ≥ 1) in 61 segments (21%).

Correlations Between RGD SUV and Subsequent Changes in 82Rb-PET Parameters

In segment-based analysis, positive correlations were found between initial RGD SUV at 1 wk and the subsequent changes at 3 mo in stress MBF (Spearman ρ: r = 0.13, P = 0.026) and MFR (Spearman ρ: r = 0.18, P = 0.003). There was no correlation between RGD SUV at 1 wk and the subsequent changes in rest MBF at 3 mo (Spearman ρ: r = –0.08, P = 0.19). A negative correlation was found between RGD SUV at 1 wk and the subsequent changes in wall motion abnormalities at 3 mo (Spearman ρ: r = –0.12, P = 0.035).

In further analysis, positive significant correlations were found between RGD SUV and the subsequent changes in stress MBF and MFR in the 1-wk to 1-mo period (Spearman ρ: r = 0.17, P = 0.0033, and Spearman ρ: r = 0.31, P < 0.0001, respectively; Fig. 5). No correlation was found between RGD SUV at 1 mo and the subsequent changes at 3 mo in stress MBF (Spearman ρ: r = 0.05, P = 0.44) or in MFR (Spearman ρ: r = –0.02, P = 0.72). No correlation was found during these shorter periods between RGD SUV and the subsequent changes in wall motion abnormalities (1-wk to 1-mo period, Spearman ρ: r = 0.02, P = 0.7; 1-mo to 3-mo period, Spearman ρ: r = 0.06, P = 0.33).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Correlations of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake at 1 wk after STEMI with subsequent changes in stress MBF (A) and MFR (B) at 1 mo. Data points represent mean segmental values.

DISCUSSION

The present study reported in vivo, in humans, an increased αvβ3 integrin expression in the infarcted myocardium 1 wk after STEMI. The levels of αvβ3 integrin expression remained stable at 1 mo after STEMI and partially decreased at 3 mo, suggesting that angiogenesis remains active 3 mo after the infarct. Moreover, there were significant weak correlations between the segmental levels of αvβ3 integrin expression at 1 wk and the subsequent improvements in stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis.

The kinetics of angiogenesis after MI in humans remain poorly understood (2). The results reported here on myocardial αvβ3 integrin expression in vivo in the human infarcted myocardium found persistent activity at 1 mo, followed by a partial decline at 3 mo. The present results are consistent with the serial changes in vascular endothelial growth factor levels observed in several studies within the peripheral blood of patients with acute MI. These levels were reported to peak at 6 wk and subsequently decline to baseline levels at 5 mo (18). Another study found a progressive increase in vascular endothelial growth factor levels that started on the first day after acute MI, peaked at 2 wk, and then subsequently declined (19). Hence, it can be thought that this prolonged increase is necessary to preserve the remaining myocardium and limit hypoxic cellular destruction.

The prolonged αvβ3 integrin upregulation found here agrees with previous studies using radiolabeled RGD peptides after MI (4,11,20,21). In a rat model, the uptake of the 18F-galacto-RGD tracer was detected only 3 d after MI and reached its highest levels between 1 and 3 wk; the levels were still detectable after 6 mo. Moreover, the evolution of 18F-galacto-RGD tracer uptake correlated well with neovascularization as assessed by immunohistochemical CD31 staining (4). Similarly, the uptake pattern of 18F-AlF-NOTA-PRGD2, in the infarcted area at various time points after MI, also started after only 3 d and peaked between 1 and 3 wk; a subsequent partial decrease was reported 4 mo after MI (20). In humans, Jenkins et al. (11) found that 18F-labeled RGD uptake was increased within 2 wk in the infarcted myocardium. It persisted but was reduced after approximately 10 wk. There was no uptake found at sites of established old infarctions. It is of note that in the present study, an examination of established old infarction sites was not conducted since none of the participants had an MI history before acute STEMI. Nevertheless, in our trial evaluating tumoral angiogenesis (NCT02666547), which includes some patients with a prior history of MI, we do not observe any visually positive uptake of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD in the myocardium.

The present study reported significant correlations between the segmental levels of αvβ3 integrin at 1 wk and the subsequent improvements in clinically relevant physiologic parameters, such as stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis. Although the correlations were weak, they were determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, which is insensitive to outliers. Additionally, the alignment of PET findings could have been more accurate, since distinct radiotracers (with high-energy positrons) and acquisitions were used. A stronger effect of these correlations can be assumed, which means that the correlations are likely relevant. Notably, a slightly stronger correlation was observed between αvβ3 integrin expression levels and improvements in MFR, which is considered a more robust independent prognostic factor than is stress MBF (22). Furthermore, no correlation was found between αvβ3 integrin expression levels and subsequent changes in rest MBF, a parameter unrelated to clinical outcomes and unaffected by post-MI recovery (23,24). The significant but weak correlation between αvβ3 integrin expression levels at 1 wk and functional outcomes aligns with previous challenges to translate microscopic levels of angiogenesis into functional improvements. For example, Wu et al. reported only trends toward lower perfusion defects and metabolism deficits in vascular endothelial growth factor–treated animal models, without statistically significant changes (25). Nevertheless, as here, several studies suggested that elevated αvβ3 integrin expression after ischemic myocardial injury is associated with subsequent improvement in regional left ventricular function (6,11,12,26,27). Recently, using the same PET tracer with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD, Nammas et al. reported in humans that αvβ3 integrin expression levels 1 wk after MI were linked to regional and global systolic dysfunction, as well as elevated left ventricular filling pressure, and predicted improved global left ventricular function 6 mo after MI (12). Despite these insights, further studies are warranted to better understand whether the angiogenic response is associated with functional recovery.

Variability was observed in the temporal pattern of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake, with a notable increase found at 1 mo in 2 participants. Interestingly, the 2 participants affected were those experiencing the most severe infarcts. On the basis of these findings, it remains uncertain whether this increase in 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake is related to intensified reendothelialization and angiogenesis or indicates a shift toward myofibroblast cell types, suggesting an intensified fibrotic response. This delayed phase of repair is characterized by a reduction in inflammation and angiogenesis and a reorganization of the extracellular matrix through myofibroblast-driven type I and III collagen production (1). This more intense uptake during follow-up in infarcted areas where perfusion is most profoundly reduced, with a trend toward a delayed 1-mo peak, may reflect the need for a more intense healing process in those tissues.

The present trial had several limitations. Inflammatory cells and fibroblasts can express integrins such as αvβ3 (7–10), which can lead to reduced specificity. This may explain the weak correlations found between the 1-wk 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD uptake and the subsequent improvements in flow, as well as the absence of correlation found from 1 mo onward. The positron range is higher for 68Ga than for 18F, which may affect image quality, especially in relatively small moving structures. Nevertheless, 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD has the advantage of straightforward synthesis at room temperature with high radiochemical yield and purity. It can be radiolabeled rapidly (<30 min) and in a fully automated good-manufacturing-practice–compliant manner. Furthermore, the on-site availability of 68Ge/68Ga generators for centers without access to a cyclotron makes it a good alternative for 18F-labeled compounds. Moreover, a higher uptake of multimeric RGD tracers than of monomeric tracers was reported (28). A multimodal imaging strategy, such as PET/MRI, could precisely delineate the area at risk and its border zone. The study would have been strengthened by an independent measure of regional function using echocardiography or MRI. Furthermore, the contribution of nonspecific uptake to 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD accumulation cannot be excluded. However, positive uptake was found in segments with preserved perfusion and in segments with low perfusion, and as radiolabeled RGD-based peptides have shown rapid clearance from the circulation (4,14), it seems unlikely that nonspecific uptake related to changes in vascular permeability played a major role. Finally, the potential impact of standard medication regimens for coronary artery disease (e.g., statins, antihypertensives) on the uptake of 82Rb or 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD remains uncertain.

CONCLUSION

The present study found that αvβ3 integrin expression is significantly increased in the infarcted myocardium 1 wk after STEMI. This expression remained stable after 1 mo and partially decreased after 3 mo. Initial αvβ3 integrin expression at 1 wk was significantly weakly correlated with subsequent improvements in stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis. An enhanced comprehension of the mechanistic aspects of infarct αvβ3 integrin expression could provide multiple therapeutic options.

DISCLOSURE

The Swiss Heart Foundation (Bern, Switzerland) provided financial support in developing the 68Ga-RGD radiopharmaceutical. Matthieu Dietz was a PhD student partially supported by research fellowship awards from the Société Française de Radiologie, Paris, France, and from the Agence Régionale de Santé Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, Lyon, France. Antti Saraste discloses grants from the Research Council of Finland and Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and speaker or consultancy fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Juhani Knuuti received consultancy fees from GE Healthcare and Synektik Pharma and speaker fees from Bayer, Lundbeck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Siemens, outside the submitted work. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: What are the spatiotemporal dynamics of αvβ3 integrin expression after MI, and its correlation with changes in MBF, using 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and rest and stress 82Rb-PET/CT at 1 wk, 1 mo, and 3 mo after STEMI?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: This prospective clinical study showed that αvβ3 integrin expression was significantly increased in the infarcted myocardium 1 wk after STEMI. This expression remained stable after 1 mo and partially decreased after 3 mo. Initial αvβ3 integrin expression at 1 wk was significantly weakly correlated with subsequent improvements in stress MBF, MFR, and wall motion analysis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: An enhanced comprehension of the mechanistic aspects of infarct αvβ3 integrin expression could provide multiple therapeutic options.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Christine Geldhof (Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland) for her invaluable help. Additionally, we thank Shanez Haouari (DRS, Hospices Civils de Lyon) for her help in manuscript preparation. Lastly, we express our deep appreciation to all participating patients and their families.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 9, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Prabhu SD,
    2. Frangogiannis NG
    . The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119:91–112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Reboll MR,
    3. Korf-Klingebiel M,
    4. Wollert KC
    . Angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117:1257–1273.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Meoli DF,
    2. Sadeghi MM,
    3. Krassilnikova S,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive imaging of myocardial angiogenesis following experimental myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1684–1691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Higuchi T,
    2. Bengel FM,
    3. Seidl S,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of αvβ3 integrin expression after myocardial infarction by positron emission tomography. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;78:395–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Brooks PC,
    2. Clark RA,
    3. Cheresh DA
    . Requirement of vascular integrin αvβ3 for angiogenesis. Science. 1994;264:569–571.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sherif HM,
    2. Saraste A,
    3. Nekolla SG,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of early αvβ3 integrin expression predicts long-term left-ventricle remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:318–323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Antonov AS,
    2. Kolodgie FD,
    3. Munn DH,
    4. Gerrity RG
    . Regulation of macrophage foam cell formation by αVβ3 integrin. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:247–258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. van den Borne SWM,
    2. Isobe S,
    3. Verjans JW,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of interstitial alterations in remodeling myocardium after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2017–2028.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Asano Y,
    2. Ihn H,
    3. Yamane K,
    4. Jinnin M,
    5. Mimura Y,
    6. Tamaki K
    . Increased expression of integrin αvβ3 contributes to the establishment of autocrine TGF-beta signaling in scleroderma fibroblasts. J Immunol. 2005;175:7708–7718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. de Haas HJ,
    2. Arbustini E,
    3. Fuster V,
    4. Kramer CM,
    5. Narula J
    . Molecular imaging of the cardiac extracellular matrix. Circ Res. 2014;114:903–915.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jenkins WSA,
    2. Vesey AT,
    3. Stirrat C,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac αVβ3 integrin expression following acute myocardial infarction in humans. Heart. 2017;103:607–615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nammas W,
    2. Paunonen C,
    3. Teuho J,
    4. et al
    . Imaging of myocardial αvβ3 integrin expression for evaluation of myocardial injury after acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:132–138.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Simons M,
    2. Alitalo K,
    3. Annex BH,
    4. et al
    . American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. State-of-the-art methods for evaluation of angiogenesis and tissue vascularization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res. 2015;116:e99–e132.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Knetsch PA,
    2. Petrik M,
    3. Griessinger CM,
    4. et al
    . [68Ga]NODAGA-RGD for imaging αvβ3 integrin expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1303–1312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pohle K,
    2. Notni J,
    3. Bussemer J,
    4. Kessler H,
    5. Schwaiger M,
    6. Beer AJ
    . 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD is a suitable substitute for 18F-galacto-RGD and can be produced with high specific activity in a cGMP/GRP compliant automated process. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39:777–784.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kitkungvan D,
    2. Johnson NP,
    3. Roby AE,
    4. Patel MB,
    5. Kirkeeide R,
    6. Gould KL
    . Routine clinical quantitative rest stress myocardial perfusion for managing coronary artery disease: clinical relevance of test-retest variability. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:565–577.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dietz M,
    2. Kamani CH,
    3. Allenbach G,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30:1385–1395.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lee KW,
    2. Lip GYH,
    3. Blann AD
    . Plasma angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, angiopoietin receptor tie-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004;110:2355–2360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hojo Y,
    2. Ikeda U,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. et al
    . Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:968–973.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gao H,
    2. Lang L,
    3. Guo N,
    4. et al
    . PET imaging of angiogenesis after myocardial infarction/reperfusion using a one-step labeled integrin-targeted tracer 18F-AlF-NOTA-PRGD2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:683–692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Makowski MR,
    2. Rischpler C,
    3. Ebersberger U,
    4. et al
    . Multiparametric PET and MRI of myocardial damage after myocardial infarction: correlation of integrin αvβ3 expression and myocardial blood flow. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:1070–1080.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Juárez-Orozco LE,
    2. Tio RA,
    3. Alexanderson E,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative myocardial perfusion evaluation with positron emission tomography and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review of prognostic studies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:1179–1187.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Johnson NP,
    2. Gould KL,
    3. De Bruyne B
    . Autoregulation of coronary blood supply in response to demand: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:2335–2345.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cuculi F,
    2. De Maria GL,
    3. Meier P,
    4. et al
    . Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1894–1904.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wu JC,
    2. Chen IY,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. et al
    . Molecular imaging of the kinetics of vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 2004;110:685–691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bentsen S,
    2. Jensen JK,
    3. Christensen E,
    4. et al
    . [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-E[(cRGDyK)]2 angiogenesis PET following myocardial infarction in an experimental rat model predicts cardiac functional parameters and development of heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023;30:2073–2084.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Follin B,
    2. Hoeeg C,
    3. Hunter I,
    4. et al
    . [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-E[(cRGDyK)]2 and [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET predict improvement in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:268.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Notni J,
    2. Pohle K,
    3. Wester HJ
    . Be spoilt for choice with radiolabelled RGD peptides: preclinical evaluation of 68Ga-TRAP(RGD)3 . Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:33–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication January 24, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication April 13, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 7
July 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Natural History of Myocardial αvβ3 Integrin Expression After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation with Changes in Myocardial Blood Flow
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Natural History of Myocardial αvβ3 Integrin Expression After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation with Changes in Myocardial Blood Flow
Matthieu Dietz, Christel H. Kamani, Colin Bousige, Vincent Dunet, Judith Delage, Vladimir Rubimbura, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Giorgio Treglia, Niklaus Schaefer, Wail Nammas, Antti Saraste, Juhani Knuuti, Nathan Mewton, John O. Prior
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2024, 65 (7) 1107-1112; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267514

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Natural History of Myocardial αvβ3 Integrin Expression After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation with Changes in Myocardial Blood Flow
Matthieu Dietz, Christel H. Kamani, Colin Bousige, Vincent Dunet, Judith Delage, Vladimir Rubimbura, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Giorgio Treglia, Niklaus Schaefer, Wail Nammas, Antti Saraste, Juhani Knuuti, Nathan Mewton, John O. Prior
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2024, 65 (7) 1107-1112; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267514
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • integrin αvβ3
  • PET
  • Myocardial infarction
  • angiogenesis
  • RGD
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire