Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes-Radioactive & Nonradioactive - Dosimetry & Image Analysis

Comparison of corneal and lens doses to nuclear medicine staffs with and without lead glasses: a Monte Carlo simulation study

Zahra Akbari Khanaposhtani and Hossein Rajabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241621;
Zahra Akbari Khanaposhtani
1Taribiat Modares University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hossein Rajabi
1Taribiat Modares University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241621

Introduction: The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) revised the threshold dose for the eye lens in 2012, leading to numerous studies focused on estimating eye lens doses for radiation workers. However, none of these studies have considered the cornea of the eye. It is important to note that the practical method of dosimetry for the eye lens introduces uncertainty. In this study, we developed a high-resolution pixelized phantom of the eye and utilized Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the doses to both the cornea and the lens. The primary objective of this study was to compare the doses to the cornea and the lens while investigating the impact of lead glasses on these tissues

Methods: In this study, the Monte Carlo toolkit named GATE (version 9.0, developed based on GEANT4 version 10.6) was employed to estimate the dose in the voxelized phantom of a typical human eye. Photon beams were generated using decay schemes of radionuclides (F-18, I-131, and Tc-99m) extracted from the MIRD book. We also considered these radionuclides inside the ICRP phantom and estimated the radiation emitted at the original radiation and spectra of emitted radiation from the phantom were the average energy of the photons. Lead glasses of different thicknesses (zero to 0.75 mm) were considered in front of the eye phantom separate Monte Carlo simulations.

Results: The ratio of corneal to lens doses for all radiations considered in this study was higher than unity. This ratio increased with increasing the thickness of lead glasses and also decreasing the average energy of radiation spectra. Due to increasing the lead glass thickness the ratio increased by 0.009, 0.014, and 0.034 for F-18, I-131, and Tc-99m respectively for their original radiation. However, the change in the ratio was not significant for F-18, I-131 but it was considerable for Tc-99m (0.031) for the radiation emitting from phantom at 3 m. However, the increased ratios were considerable due to a change in the average energy of spectra, 0.014, 0.021, and 0.024 for the three radionuclides tested respectively.

Conclusions: The corneal doses were higher for the radations from the three radionuclides tested. On average the corneal doses were higher by 12%, 11%, and 21% for t F-18, I-131, and Tc-99m respectively. Moreover, the calculation of standard deviation showed that the lens dose experiences a more pronounced variation compared to the cornea, at least for the three radionuclides tested in this study. With an increase in lead glasses' thickness, both lens and cornea doses decreased. However, the cornea-to-lens dose ratio rises, indicating a relatively greater reduction in lens dose.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of corneal and lens doses to nuclear medicine staffs with and without lead glasses: a Monte Carlo simulation study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of corneal and lens doses to nuclear medicine staffs with and without lead glasses: a Monte Carlo simulation study
Zahra Akbari Khanaposhtani, Hossein Rajabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241621;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of corneal and lens doses to nuclear medicine staffs with and without lead glasses: a Monte Carlo simulation study
Zahra Akbari Khanaposhtani, Hossein Rajabi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241621;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Dosimetry for Ac-225 and Bi-213 labeled cancer therapy agents.
  • SPECT Frame Duration Shortening: Impact on Lu-177 Dosimetry
  • Impact of Segmentation Methods on Healthy Organ and Tumor Activity Estimates for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy – Results from SNMMI 177Lu Dosimetry Challenge
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes-Radioactive & Nonradioactive - Dosimetry & Image Analysis

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire