Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Optimization of Image quality and noise reduction by regulating beta penalty function of BSREM reconstruction algorithm

Pooja Dwivedi, Viraj Sawant, Vishal Vajarkar, Sayak Choudhury, Ashish Jha and VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4128;
Pooja Dwivedi
1Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viraj Sawant
2Tmc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vishal Vajarkar
3ACTREC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sayak Choudhury
4Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashish Jha
4Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
5TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MUMBAI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

4128

Introduction: The aim of the study is to determine the optimum penalization factor of the Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm and comparing with standard PET reconstruction OSEM on the basis of both quantitative and qualitative analysis for its clinical use in Ca breast patients undergoing F18 Fdg PET CT. Accuracy of SUV calculation is essential for quantification of data acquired and noise reduction is essential to apply during image reconstruction to improve the overall quality of the image. OSEM is a fast and one of the most applied PET reconstruction algorithms. However, image noise increases with subsequent iterations, and the algorithm is stopped before the images become too noisy. This could lead to inaccuracies for quantitative assessment as the algorithm does not reach full convergence. Q.Clear is a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm for PET, which allows full convergence of measured and estimated data without noise amplification during image reconstruction.

Methods: We included the retrospective study of 20 patients' data with F18 FDG PET-positive ca breast scans. These patients underwent a PET CT scan with an average injected dose of 4 MBq per kg weight with 60 minutes uptake period and scan time of 1min per bed. Patient data were acquired on GE Discovery IQ 5 rings PET CT. PET emission data were reconstructed using conventional OSEM and BSREM with standard correction of decay, scatter, random, dead time, attenuation, normalization with the image matrix of 256x256. OSEM reconstruction was performed by selecting VPHD with 12 subsets 2 iterations and 4mm FWHM. BSREM reconstructions were performed with Q.Clear where penalized likelihood objective function of varying beta values of 200,250,300,350,400, 450,500, 550 and 600 were used . Reconstructed images were analyzed on PET CT review tool on advantage workstation and region of interest were drawn around lesions using a segmentation threshold of 40% and ROI was propagated in all images for calculating SUVmax, SUV mean and right lobe of the liver is taken for background ROIs where background SUVmean and standard deviation SUVstd was calculated. Quantitative evaluation was done by calculating noise level, signal to noise ratio SNR of the lesion, and Signal to background ratio SBR whereas qualitative analysis was done by visual scoring for image quality, lesion detectability, and background noise.

Results: Total 21 lesions were identified for the study in the size range of 1.2 to 2.5 cm. It was observed that SNR of the lesion was increased with increasing beta values as noise levels were decreased with increasing beta values, whereas SBR was decreased with increasing beta values as SUVmax of the lesion was also decreasing when noise was decreased. Reconstructed images with a beta less than 300 have higher background noise and images with a beta greater than 400 have lower background noise. Visual scoring suggests 350 beta value provides better lesion detection whereas 400 beta value gives better background noise on comparing with OSEM.

Conclusions: This study gives an indication that in the BSREM algorithm Q.Clear beta value of 350 is optimum for SUV calculations with overall better image quality in Ca breast positive F18Fdg PET CT studies. Beta penalty function of 300 to 400 is well documented optimum range for F18fdg PET torso studies which are further validated in our experimental study. On comparing with OSEM Q.Clear definitely provides higher signal and lesser noise without compromising image quality however as the penalty function of BSREM is a user-dependent variable to the algorithm this should be optimized depending upon the anatomical region scanned and the radiopharmaceutical used.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimization of Image quality and noise reduction by regulating beta penalty function of BSREM reconstruction algorithm
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimization of Image quality and noise reduction by regulating beta penalty function of BSREM reconstruction algorithm
Pooja Dwivedi, Viraj Sawant, Vishal Vajarkar, Sayak Choudhury, Ashish Jha, VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4128;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimization of Image quality and noise reduction by regulating beta penalty function of BSREM reconstruction algorithm
Pooja Dwivedi, Viraj Sawant, Vishal Vajarkar, Sayak Choudhury, Ashish Jha, VENKATESH RANGARAJAN
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4128;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
  • Assessment of Tumor Burden in Lymphoma Patients with Deauville Score 4 Disease on Post Therapy FDG PET
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire