Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Comparison between the μ-maps of different PET tracers: 18F-FDG and 18F-flutemetamol, generated by the attenuation correction method without external radiation source

Takahiro Yamada, Kohei Hanaoka, Yoshiyuki Yamakawa, Suzuka Minagawa, Atsushi Ohtani, Tetsuro Mizuta, Hayato Kaida and Kazunari Ishii
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4127;
Takahiro Yamada
1Kindai University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kohei Hanaoka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiyuki Yamakawa
2Shimadzu Corporation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzuka Minagawa
2Shimadzu Corporation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Ohtani
2Shimadzu Corporation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuro Mizuta
2Shimadzu Corporation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hayato Kaida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazunari Ishii
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

4127

Introduction: Currently, external radiation sources such as CT are widely used for attenuation correction in PET scans. On the other hand, increased radiation exposure to the lens and other parts has been a problem to consider. We evaluated the attenuation correction method using the dedicated brain PET scanner, which generates attenuation maps from emission data without external radiation sources (Mizuta T, et. al. ANM, 2022, in press).

Methods: For this study, the TOF dedicated brain PET (SET-5002: prototype of BresTome, Shimadzu Corp., Japan) was used. The μ-maps obtained with two different PET tracers (18F-FDG and 18F-Flutemetamol) in the same subjects were compared. Two types of μ-maps were produced by PET imaging with different PET tracers in the same six subjects. We measured the μ-values by setting the regions of interest in three regions: extracranial (air), intracerebral (white matter and gray matter), and bone on each μ-maps.

Results: The mean μ-values for all cases of μ-maps from the two tracers was 0.0936±0.0018 for 18F-FDG and 0.0974±0.0024 for 18F-flutemetamol in the intracerebral, while in bone was 0.123±0.0142 and 0.123±0.0218, respectively. There was no significant difference between these two areas (p>.05). Moreover, the μ-value in the extracerebral (air) region was 0 in both subjects.

Conclusions: These results suggest that the obtained μ-maps may be comparable even when generated by different PET tracers. However, since the number of cases in this study is small, we need to increase the number of cases in the future, and we also need to evaluate regional difference.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison between the μ-maps of different PET tracers: 18F-FDG and 18F-flutemetamol, generated by the attenuation correction method without external radiation source
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison between the μ-maps of different PET tracers: 18F-FDG and 18F-flutemetamol, generated by the attenuation correction method without external radiation source
Takahiro Yamada, Kohei Hanaoka, Yoshiyuki Yamakawa, Suzuka Minagawa, Atsushi Ohtani, Tetsuro Mizuta, Hayato Kaida, Kazunari Ishii
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4127;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison between the μ-maps of different PET tracers: 18F-FDG and 18F-flutemetamol, generated by the attenuation correction method without external radiation source
Takahiro Yamada, Kohei Hanaoka, Yoshiyuki Yamakawa, Suzuka Minagawa, Atsushi Ohtani, Tetsuro Mizuta, Hayato Kaida, Kazunari Ishii
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4127;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire