Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEarly Phase (Phase 0 or I) human studies

Impact of Pre-Administration of Anti-IGF-1R Antibody FPI 1175 on the Dosimetry, Tumor Uptake, and Pharmacokinetics of the IGF-1R Targeted Theranostic Imaging Agent [111In] FPI 1547 in Patients with Solid Tumors

Andrew Scott, Fred Saad, Daniel Juneau, Michael Brown, Ian Kirkwood, Michelle Nottage, John Rhoden, Julia Kazakin, Joanne Schindler, Nicholas Baca, Richard Sparks, James OLeary and Eric Burak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2275;
Andrew Scott
1Austin Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Saad
2Division of Urology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Juneau
3Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Brown
4Centre for Cancer Biology SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide SA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Kirkwood
5Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Nottage
5Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Rhoden
6Fusion Pharmaceuticals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Kazakin
7Fusion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Schindler
6Fusion Pharmaceuticals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Baca
8CDE Dosimetry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Sparks
9CDE Dosimetry Services, Inc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James OLeary
6Fusion Pharmaceuticals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Burak
6Fusion Pharmaceuticals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2275

Introduction: [111In]‑FPI‑1547 is an In‑111 labeled antibody (Ab) targeting the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R). [111In]‑FPI‑1547, the imaging biomarker analogue of the therapeutic Ac‑225 labeled Ab, is being used for patient selection and quantification of IGF-1R expression in a Phase 1 study of [225Ac]‑FPI‑1434. The objective of this study is to identify the maximum tolerated dose and optimal dosing regimen of [225Ac]‑FPI‑1434 in patients with IGF-1R avid tumors assessed by imaging. Concurrent with the dose escalation portion of the Phase 1 study, an exploratory sub-study was conducted to assess the impact of pre-dosing with the parent Ab (cold Ab, FPI‑1175, formerly AVE1642) on biodistribution, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dosimetry of [111In]-FPI-1547.

Methods: Each patient in the cold Ab sub-study (CASS) underwent two [111In]‑FPI‑1547 imaging evaluations, with and without pre-administration of FPI‑1175, such that each patient served as their own control to evaluate the extent of any changes in biodistribution and organ dosimetry. In each imaging evaluation, the absorbed radiation dose to major organs and tumor lesions was estimated after intravenous administration of 185 MBq of [111In]‑FPI‑1547 with or without pre-dosing of 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg FPI‑1175. Serial anterior/posterior scintigraphic images were obtained over 6 to8 days and count data were used to estimate absorbed dose to normal organs/tissues and tumor lesions per the MIRD schema. Plasma PK of [111In]‑FPI‑1547 were determined by radioanalysis of samples collected. The impact of FPI‑1175 pre-administration on normal organ and lesion dosimetry for the corresponding 225Ac form was assessed by evaluating the changes in biodistribution, residence time, and absorbed dose estimates with and without FPI‑1175 in normal organs relative to changes in tumor lesions.

Results: A total of five patients completed the CASS, of which two were randomized to 0.5 mg/kg and three to 1.5 mg/kg FPI‑1175. Normal organ/tissue dosimetry was available for four patients and lesion dosimetry data for five patients. In general, a favorable dosimetry shift was noted with the addition of FPI‑1175 relative to [111In]‑FPI‑1547 alone, with improved lesion-to-normal organ ratio of radiation absorbed dose estimates in most patients who received FPI‑1175 pre-administration. Results at 0.5 mg/kg were generally more favorable versus 1.5 mg/kg FPI‑1175. With the addition of FPI‑1175, sites of improved lesion uptake were noted independent of anatomic location (including bone, mediastinum, lung, liver, and lymph nodes). Pre-administration of FPI‑1175 significantly increased [111In]‑FPI‑1547 plasma exposure (AUC) without any changes in the [111In]‑FPI‑1547 safety profile. No grade ≥3 toxicity with or without pre-dosing with FPI‑1175 were observed. The PK profile of [111In]‑FPI‑1547 with the added FPI‑1175 was consistent with previously reported PK of the parental Ab FPI‑1175.

Conclusions: This prospective analysis of FPI-1175 administration prior to [111In]-FPI-1547 did not identify any significant change in the safety profile of [111In]-FPI-1547, demonstrated a favorable gain in tumor lesion uptake versus normal tissue and supports assessment of pre-administration of FPI-1175 prior to [225Ac]-FPI-1434. Additional data on lesion uptake and PK parameters in the different dose cohorts will be presented. Exploration of the potential value of adding FPI-1175 to [225Ac]-FPI-1434 dosing regimen have been incorporated into the ongoing Phase 1 study (NCT03746431).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Pre-Administration of Anti-IGF-1R Antibody FPI 1175 on the Dosimetry, Tumor Uptake, and Pharmacokinetics of the IGF-1R Targeted Theranostic Imaging Agent [111In] FPI 1547 in Patients with Solid Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of Pre-Administration of Anti-IGF-1R Antibody FPI 1175 on the Dosimetry, Tumor Uptake, and Pharmacokinetics of the IGF-1R Targeted Theranostic Imaging Agent [111In] FPI 1547 in Patients with Solid Tumors
Andrew Scott, Fred Saad, Daniel Juneau, Michael Brown, Ian Kirkwood, Michelle Nottage, John Rhoden, Julia Kazakin, Joanne Schindler, Nicholas Baca, Richard Sparks, James OLeary, Eric Burak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2275;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Pre-Administration of Anti-IGF-1R Antibody FPI 1175 on the Dosimetry, Tumor Uptake, and Pharmacokinetics of the IGF-1R Targeted Theranostic Imaging Agent [111In] FPI 1547 in Patients with Solid Tumors
Andrew Scott, Fred Saad, Daniel Juneau, Michael Brown, Ian Kirkwood, Michelle Nottage, John Rhoden, Julia Kazakin, Joanne Schindler, Nicholas Baca, Richard Sparks, James OLeary, Eric Burak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2275;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Multiparametric molecular profiling of lesion heterogeneity and response to therapy in patients with aggressive multiple myeloma with combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/MR
  • Total-body dynamic PET/CT imaging of 11C-Methionine in multiple myeloma
  • Head-to-head comparison of biodistribution and tumor uptake of [68Ga]FAPI versus [18F]FDG-PET/CT in bladder cancer: a pilot study
Show more Early Phase (Phase 0 or I) human studies

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire