Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOther Solid Tumors

? Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT and conventional digital PET/CT in patients with malignance tumor: how sensitive could it be?

Xueqi Chen, Pengcheng Hu and Hongcheng Shi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3141;
Xueqi Chen
1Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pengcheng Hu
1Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongcheng Shi
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3141

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the sensitivity of the 18F-FDG total-body (TB) PET/CT and a conventional digital PET/CT using a head-to-head comparison with the pathological findings as reference.

Methods: The prospective study was conducted on 125 consecutive patients who underwent a TB PET/CT scan and a conventional digital PET/CT scan in random sequence after a single 18F-FDG injection (3.7MBq/kg). Finally, 67 patients (median age, 65 years; 24 female and 43 male patients) were enrolled in this study. PET raw data of TB PET/CT were acquired within 5 min and reconstructed using data from the first 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min (G1, G2, G3, G4, G5). The images of conventional digital PET/CT were referred to as G0. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale and interpreted images for staging. Objective image quality and lesions characteristics were measured and compared with G0. Sub-analysis on regional lymphocytes was also performed.

Results: A total of 241 lesions (69 primary lesions; 140 local lymphocyte metastases; 32 distal metastases) of 67 patients&nbsp;with ten types of cancer,&nbsp;proved by pathology, were analyzed. The subjective image quality score and SNR increased gradually from G1 to G5, significantly higher than G0 (all&nbsp;p&nbsp;< 0.05). In addition, G4 and G5 of TB PET/CT detected additional 13 lesions (2 primary lesions; 6 lymphocyte metastases; 5 distant lesions) and&nbsp;enabled correct treatment recommendations for six patients&nbsp;(6/67?9.0%)&nbsp;compared with&nbsp;conventional&nbsp;PET/CT.

Conclusions: This study showed that 4-min acquisition in TB PET/CT using regular dose is&nbsp;appreciated for optimal detection efficiency in various lesions, including small and low-uptake lesions. And&nbsp;TB PET/CT enables more appropriate management than conventional digital PET/CT for detecting more lesions as well as higher image quality.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
? Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT and conventional digital PET/CT in patients with malignance tumor: how sensitive could it be?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
? Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT and conventional digital PET/CT in patients with malignance tumor: how sensitive could it be?
Xueqi Chen, Pengcheng Hu, Hongcheng Shi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3141;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
? Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT and conventional digital PET/CT in patients with malignance tumor: how sensitive could it be?
Xueqi Chen, Pengcheng Hu, Hongcheng Shi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3141;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • FDG PET/ CT is more likely to detect the primary source of the Cancer of unknown primary when presented with cervical lymph nodes metastasis
  • Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the metastatic workup of angiosarcoma.
Show more Other Solid Tumors

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire