Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGU

Accuracy and sensitivity of 18F-PSMA PET/CT versus 11c-choline PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients with suspected recurrence

Mathuri Sakthithasan, Marianne Kimura, Matt Spurr, Randeep Kulshrestha and Amarnath Challapalli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3073;
Mathuri Sakthithasan
1University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne Kimura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt Spurr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randeep Kulshrestha
1University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amarnath Challapalli
2Bristol Cancer Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3073

Introduction: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has been more sensitive and accurate than conventional imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was more accurate than 11c- choline PET/CT in the investigation of prostate cancer patients with suspected recurrence, who had either underwent radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy. In addition, the level of PSA levels by which the nodal and distal metastasis were detected by 11c-choline PET/CT versus 18F-PSMA PET/CT was evaluated.<u1:p></u1:p>

This is in accordance with the guidance produced from “Evidence-based indications for the use of PET/CT in the UK 2016”, which suggested that a PSMA tracer was superior to choline.<u1:p></u1:p>

Methods: Retrospectively 18F-PSMA PET/CT studies were reviewed from the year 2021 in patients post therapy for recurrence/metastasis. <u1:p></u1:p>

100 patients were evaluated. The results were obtained on our CRIS (radiology information system) and ICE (order communication system).<u1:p></u1:p>

The results of the 18F-PSMA PET/CT studies were correlated with any previous choline PET/CT, and this was further correlated to the levels of PSA the patients had. The results of this were collated on to a database and further analysed. <u1:p></u1:p>

The primary outcome was to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-PSMA PET/CT vs 11c-Choline PET/CT for evaluating local recurrence, soft tissue and skeletal metastasis<u1:p></u1:p>

Results: 28 patients had both 11c-choline PET/CT and18F- PSMA PET/CT. In 22/28 (78%) of patients, the 18F-PSMA PET was superior to 11c-choline PET/CT, and this included both local recurrence, soft tissue and bone metastasis.

In 12/28 (42%) patients 18F-PSMA PET/CT was superior in finding bone metastasis.

In 11/28 (39%) patients 18F-PSMA PET/CT was superior in finding soft metastasis.<u1:p></u1:p>

In 9/28 (32%) patients PSMA was superior for detecting local recurrence. Examples of local recurrence includes prostate bed and bladder base. <u1:p></u1:p>

18F-PSMA PET/CT was able to pick up metastasis in PSA levels as low as 0.3 and choline PET/CT was higher at PSA levels of 0.7<u1:p></u1:p>

<u1:p> </u1:p>

Conclusions: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is superior to 11c-choline PET/CT in evaluating soft tissue and distance metastasis.<u1:p></u1:p>

It provides superior accuracy and is able to detect metastasis at lower PSA levels. Therefore it can be utilised effectively when evaluating patients at very low PSA levels to detect recurrence/metastasis. <u1:p></u1:p>

The level of detection at low PSA levels implies a much more sensitive study. This potentially impacts on patient management as to whether they have stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for pelvic only disease or systemic chemotherapy for extensive metastatic disease.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accuracy and sensitivity of 18F-PSMA PET/CT versus 11c-choline PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients with suspected recurrence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Accuracy and sensitivity of 18F-PSMA PET/CT versus 11c-choline PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients with suspected recurrence
Mathuri Sakthithasan, Marianne Kimura, Matt Spurr, Randeep Kulshrestha, Amarnath Challapalli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3073;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accuracy and sensitivity of 18F-PSMA PET/CT versus 11c-choline PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients with suspected recurrence
Mathuri Sakthithasan, Marianne Kimura, Matt Spurr, Randeep Kulshrestha, Amarnath Challapalli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3073;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of furosemide induced forced diuresis on positivity rate and physiologic radiotracer activity in patients undergoing 68Ga PSMA-11 PET/CT
  • Regional Pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Intermediate-to-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Imaged Prior to Prostatectomy
  • Changes in Quantitative PSMA PET Metrics and PSA Progression-Free Survival following Initiation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: a retrospective single-center study
Show more GU

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire